Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preoperative biopsy does not affect postoperative outcomes of resectable non-small cell lung cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Preoperative diagnostic interventions such as transbronchial biopsy and/or computed tomography-guided biopsy inevitably disrupt the lung structures and may disseminate tumour cells into the airway, vessels, or pleural cavity. Therefore, these procedures may affect the postoperative outcomes. Thus, we aimed to compare the survival outcomes in patients diagnosed by transbronchial biopsy vs computed tomography-guided biopsy vs lung resection.

Methods

In a single-institution retrospective analysis, data from consecutive patients with cTanyN0M0 lung cancer, who underwent surgery between January 2006 and December 2012, were extracted by chart review. The overall and recurrence-free survivals of patients diagnosed by transbronchial biopsy, computed tomography-guided biopsy, and lung resection were compared using the univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. A stepwise backward elimination method, with a probability level of 0.15, was used to select the most powerful sets of outcome predictors.

Results

Transbronchial biopsy and/or computed tomography-guided biopsy were performed for larger and more advanced tumours, than lung resection (intra- or postoperative-diagnosis group). At crude analysis, transbronchial biopsy group and computed tomography-guided biopsy group showed higher probability of pleural dissemination, and worse prognosis than the lung resection group. At multivariate analysis, the diagnostic methods were not identified as independent risk factors of pleural dissemination, overall survival, or recurrence-free survival.

Conclusions

Preoperative diagnostic interventions did not affect the relapse risk and prognosis, in this study cohort. Thus, preoperative diagnostic intervention is recommended if deemed necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alberg AJ, Ford JG, Samet JM. Epidemiology of lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2007;132:29S–55S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Asano F, Aoe M, Ohsaki Y, Okada Y, Sasada S, Sato S, et al. Deaths and complications associated with respiratory endoscopy: a survey by the Japan Society for Respiratory Endoscopy in 2010. Respirology. 2012;17:478–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Li H, Boiselle PM, Shepard JO, Trotman-Dickenson B, McLoud TC. Diagnostic accuracy and safety of CT-guided percutaneous needle aspiration biopsy of the lung: comparison of small and large pulmonary nodules. AJR. Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167:105–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nakajima J, Sato H, Takamoto S. Does preoperative transbronchial biopsy worsen the postsurgical prognosis of lung cancer? A propensity score-adjusted analysis. Chest. 2005;128:3512–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sawabata N, Maeda H, Ohta M, Hayakawa M. Operable non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed by transpleural techniques: do they affect relapse and prognosis? Chest. 2001;120:1595–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. Lung and pleural tumours. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 7th ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. pp. 138–46.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Muller-Hermelink HK, Harris CC. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the lung, pleura, thymus and heart. In: Kleihues P, Sobin LH (eds) World Health Organization classification of tumours. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer press; 2004. pp. 9–124.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Travis WD, Asamura H, Bankier AA, Beasley MB, Detterbeck F, Flieder DB, et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for coding T categories for subsolid nodules and assessment of tumor size in part-solid tumors in the forthcoming eighth edition of the TNM Classification of Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11:1204–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Murakawa T, Konoeda C, Ito T, Inoue Y, Sano A, Nagayama K, et al. The ground glass opacity component can be eliminated from the T-factor assessment of lung adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;43:925–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Suzuki K, Yokose T, Yoshida J, Nishimura M, Takahashi K, Nagai K, et al. Prognostic significance of the size of central fibrosis in peripheral adenocarcinoma of the lung. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:893–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsutani Y, Miyata Y, Nakayama H, Okumura S, Adachi S, Yoshimura M, et al. Prognostic significance of using solid versus whole tumor size on high-resolution computed tomography for predicting pathologic malignant grade of tumors in clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143:607–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maeyashiki T, Suzuki K, Hattori A, Matsunaga T, Takamochi K, Oh S. The size of consolidation on thin-section computed tomography is a better predictor of survival than the maximum tumour dimension in resectable lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;43:915–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pinato DJ, Shiner RJ, Seckl MJ, Stebbing J, Sharma R, Mauri FA. Prognostic performance of inflammation-based prognostic indices in primary operable non-small cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2014;110:1930–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Gal AA. Use and abuse of lung biopsy. Adv Anat Pathol. 2005;12:195–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shields TW, LoCicero J, Reed CE, Feins RH. Chapter 15 Laboratory Investigations in the diagnosis of pulmonary diseases. In: Robinson PG. General thoracic surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009. pp. 237–64.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rivera MP, Mehta AC, Wahidi MM. Establishing the diagnosis of lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013; 143: e142S-e165S.

  17. Gelbman BD1, Cham MD, Kim W, Libby DM, Smith JP, Port JL, et al. Radiographic and clinical characterization of false negative results from CT-guided needle biopsies of lung nodules. J Thorac Oncol. 2012; 7: 815–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kara M, Alver G, Sak SD, Kavukçu S. Implantation metastasis caused by fine needle aspiration biopsy following curative resection of stage IB non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;20:868–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Seyfer AE, Walsh DS, Graeber GM, Nuno IN, Eliasson AH. Chest wall implantation of lung cancer after thin-needle aspiration biopsy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1989;48:284–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Voravud N, Shin DM, Dekmezian RH, Dimery I, Lee JS, Hong WK. Implantation metastasis of carcinoma after percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Chest. 1992;102:313–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Matsuoka T, Sonobe M, Date H. Intraoperative fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNA) for lung cancer: diagnostic value and risk of Pleural dissemination. Surg Today. 2015;45:695–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Inoue M, Honda O, Tomiyama N, Minami M, Sawabata N, Kadota Y, et al. Risk of pleural recurrence after computed tomographic-guided percutaneous needle biopsy in stage I lung cancer patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:1066–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Berger-Richardson D, Swallow CJ. Needle tract seeding after percutaneous biopsy of sarcoma: risk/benefit considerations. Cancer. 2017;123:560–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sawabata N, Funaki S, Hyakutake T, Shintani Y, Fujiwara A, Okumura M. Perioperative circulating tumor cells in surgical patients with non-small cell lung cancer: does surgical manipulation dislodge cancer cells thus allowing them to pass into the peripheral blood? Surg Today. 2016;46:1402–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shiono S, Ishii G, Nagai K, Yoshida J, Nishimura M, Murata Y. Histopathologic prognostic factors in resected colorectal lung metastases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:278–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sawabata N, Ohta M, Maeda H. Fine-needle aspiration cytologic technique for lung cancer has a high potential of malignant cell spread through the tract. Chest. 2000;118:936–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fidler IJ. The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: the ‘seed and soil’ hypothesis revisited. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:453–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Johansson M, Denardo DG, Coussens LM. Polarized immune responses differentially regulate cancer development. Immunol Rev. 2008;222:145–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Mr. Hideyuki Kozuka and Ms. Tomoko Hasegawa for their assistance in data collection and Mr. Tomoki Kitawaki and Mr. Takayuki Kawaura for their assistance in data-analysis.

Funding

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yohei Taniguchi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taniguchi, Y., Fukumoto, K., Matsui, H. et al. Preoperative biopsy does not affect postoperative outcomes of resectable non-small cell lung cancer. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 67, 615–623 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-019-01062-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-019-01062-1

Keywords

Navigation