Skip to main content
Log in

Political Intimacy and Self-Governance in the Dialogues of Confucius: An Exploratory Study on the Philosophical Potential of the Kongzi Jia Yu

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Dialogues of Confucius (Kongzi Jia Yu 孔子家語) is an unexplored resource for the philosophy of Confucius. In this article, I make a first attempt at mining its riches. Focusing on Chapters 21 and 32, I reconstruct a multilevel theory of governing that is a cyclic process proceeding from the moral psychology of the individual to social organization, to the society as grounded in natural processes, and to the metaphysics of the natural processes themselves, thus adumbrating a metaphysics of morals from the microcosmic to the macrocosmic. This movement between macrocosmic and microcosmic levels encompasses moral psychology, economics, politics, aesthetics, and metaphysics. The metaphysical forces that account for the blowing of the wind and the motivation of human behavior are forces that flow when functioning properly and that otherwise stagnate. Maintaining that flow is the task of the leadership. Once that task is accomplished, and the flywheel spins of its own momentum, the people become self-governing. This multilevel cyclic process is compared to contemporary Western economic and political theory that is based on the unimpeded individual, aggregated into majoritarian democratic rule, based on the social contract, and vulnerable to the tragedy of the commons. Contrary to current Confucian-based correctives to democracy that seek to limit the power of the people, this Confucian argument empowers the people via a frugal, caring, well-regulated leadership.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, J. McKenzie. 2007. The Structural Evolution of Morality. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ames, Roger T. 2021. A Conceptual Lexicon for Classical Confucian Philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, Roger T., and Henry Rosemont Jr. 1998. The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballantine Books.

  • Bai, Tongdong. 2019. Against Political Equality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Daniel A., and Pei Wang. 2022. Just Hierarchy: Why Social Hierarchies Matter in China and the Rest of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, Samuel. 2017. The Moral Economy: Why Good Incentives Are No Substitute for Good Citizens. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brindley, Erica. 2019. “The Taiyi Shengshui 太一生水 Cosmogony and Its Role in Early Chinese Thought.” In Dao Companion to the Excavated Guodian Bamboo Manuscripts, edited by Shirley Chan. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

  • Bruya, Brian. 2001. “Qing (情) and Emotion in Early Chinese Thought.” Ming Qing Yanjiu 2001: 151–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2023. “What Can We Learn from the Dialogues of Confucius?” Thinking Through Confucius 走進孔子 2: 120–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruya, Brian, and Wenwen Li, trans. Under review. The Dialogues of Confucius: A Complete Translation of the Kongzi Jia Yu 孔子家語 with Background, Notes, and Commentary.

  • Carey, Toni Vogel. 2020. “What Did Adam Smith Learn from François Quesnay?” Journal of Scottish Philosophy 18.2: 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3366/jsp.2020.0266.

  • Chan, Joseph. 2013. Confucian Perfectionism: A Political Philosophy for Modern Times. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J. J. 1997. Oriental Enlightenment: The Encounter between Asian and Western Thought. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Scott. 2012. The Bamboo Texts of Guodian: A Study and Complete Translation. 2 vols. Cornell: East Asia Program, Cornell University.

  • Cua, Anthony S., ed. 2003. Encyclopedia of Chinese Philosophy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bary, Wm. Theodore, Wing-tsit Chan, and Burton Watson. 1960. Sources of Chinese Tradition. Vol. 1. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eifring, Halvor, ed. 2004. Love and Emotions in Traditional Chinese Literature. Leiden: Brill.

  • El Amine, Loubna. 2015. Classical Confucian Political Thought: A New Interpretation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, Owen. 2008. “Moral Contagion and Logical Persuasion in the Mozi《墨子》.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 35.3: 473–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaus, Gerald. 2011. The Order of Public Reason: A Theory of Freedom and Morality in a Diverse Bounded World. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2015. “The Egalitarian Species.” Social Philosophy and Policy 31.2: 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052514000235.

  • ______. 2018. “The Complexity of a Diverse Moral Order.” Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy 16: 645–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, Christian. 2005. “Wu-Wei in Europe: A Study of Eurasian Economic Thought.” Working Papers of the Global Economic History Network. London: Department of Economic History, London School of Economics and Political Science. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/22479/.

  • Guy, Basil. 1963. The French Image of China before and after Voltaire. Edited by Theodore Besterman. Vol. 21. Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century. Geneva: Institut et Musée Voltaire.

  • Hanley, Christopher. 2015. “Neoliberalism, Emotional Experience in Education and Adam Smith: Reading The Theory of Moral Sentiments alongside The Wealth of Nations.” Journal of Educational Administration and History 47.2: 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2015.996868.

  • Hardin, Garrett. 1968. “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science 162.3859: 1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243.

  • Henricks, Robert G., trans. 2000. Lao Tzu’s Tao Te Ching: A Translation of the Startling New Documents Found at Guodian. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Huang, Huaixin 黃懷信. 2017. The Case of Kong Family Studies and Forged Texts during the Han and Jin 漢晉孔氏家學與「偽書」公案. Taoyuan 桃園: Changming Wenhua Chubanshe 昌明文化出版社.

  • Ing, Michael David Kaulana. 2012. The Dysfunction of Ritual in Early Confucianism. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Jiang, Yi-Huah. 2018. “Confucian Political Theory in Contemporary China.” Annual Review of Political Science 21.1: 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041916-020230.

  • Keller, Evelyn Fox. 2008. “Organisms, Machines, and Thunderstorms: A History of Self-Organization, Part One.” Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 38.1: 45–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramers, Robert P. 1950. K’ung Tzŭ Chia Yü: The School Sayings of Confucius. Leiden: Brill.

  • Li Ji 禮記. 1998–2024. In the “CHANT Database 漢達文庫,” edited by the D. C. Lau Research Centre for Chinese Ancient Texts, the Institute of Chinese Studies, the Chinese University of Hong Kong. https://www.chant.org/text/book/cdefcbf0-40b4-11e9-83f0-7bf6141e80e3/470ec530-416b-11e9-ad8f-33892dfd0443 (last accessed on February 19, 2024).

  • Loewe, Michael. 1993. Early Chinese Texts: A Bibliographic Guide. Berkeley: The Society for the Study of Early China and The Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, Berkeley.

  • Makeham, John. 1996. “The Formation of Lunyu as a Book.” Monumenta Serica 44: 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maverick, Lewis A., trans., and François Quesnay. 1946. China, a Model for Europe. San Antonio: Paul Anderson Co.

  • Meltzoff, Andrew N., and Jean Decety. 2003. “What Imitation Tells Us about Social Cognition: A Rapprochement between Developmental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 358.1431: 491–500. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1261.

  • Meyers, Robert A. 2009. Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Middendorf, Ulrike. 2008. “Again on ‘Qing.’ With a Translation of the Guodian ‘Xing Zi Ming Chu.’” Oriens Extremus 47: 97–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nylan, Michael. 2001. The Five Confucian Classics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Elinor. 2015. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Puett, Michael. 2010. “Ritualization as Domestication: Ritual Theory from Classical China.” In Grammars and Morphologies of Ritual Practices in Asia, edited by Alex Michaels and Anand Mishra. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.

  • Seok, Bongrae. 2012. Embodied Moral Psychology and Confucian Philosophy. New York: Lexington. https://rowman.com/ISBN/9780739148938/Embodied-Moral-Psychology-and-Confucian-Philosophy (last accessed on February 19, 2024).

  • Smith, Adam. 2013. Wealth of Nations. Wordsworth Classics of World Literature. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions.

  • Vallier, Kevin. 2023. “The Social Philosophy of Gerald Gaus: Moral Relations amid Control, Contestation, and Complexity.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 9.3: 510–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Qing 王青. 2005. “Sacrifice in the State of Lu throughout the Evolution of the Culture of Ritual Propriety and Music 禮樂文化嬗變中的魯國祭祀.” M.A. Thesis, Qufu Normal University, Shandong, China.

  • Yang, Chaoming 楊朝明, and Song Lilin 宋立林. 2013. A Comprehensive Explanation of the Dialogues of Confucius 孔子家語通解. Ji’nan 濟南: Qilu Chubanshe 齊魯出版社.

  • Young, Jeffrey T. 2002. “Adam Smith and the Physiocrats: Contrasting Views of the Law of Nature.” History of Economic Ideas 10.3: 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong Lun 中論. 1998–2024. By Xu Gan 徐幹. In the “CHANT Database 漢達文庫,” edited by the D. C. Lau Research Centre for Chinese Ancient Texts, the Institute of Chinese Studies, the Chinese University of Hong Kong. https://www.chant.org/text/book/ce1fe370-40b4-11e9-91fe-b3520dfc3519/48cf3680-416b-11e9-b1cb-c1f45752337e (last accessed on February 19, 2024).

  • Ziliotti, Elena. 2022. “Questions for Hierarchical Confucianism.” The Review of Politics 84.3: 329–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Martin Powers, Peter Higgins, Wenwen Li, and two anonymous reviewers of this journal for suggestions that have improved this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Bruya.

Ethics declarations

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bruya, B. Political Intimacy and Self-Governance in the Dialogues of Confucius: An Exploratory Study on the Philosophical Potential of the Kongzi Jia Yu. Dao (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-024-09932-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-024-09932-z

Keywords

Navigation