Skip to main content
Log in

Hypocrisy as Described in the Analects and the Mengzi

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I argue that the phenomenon of hypocrisy appears in many passages and connects to multiple ideas in the Analects: exemplary persons (junzi 君子), petty persons (xiaoren 小人), the village worthies or the village pleasers (xiangyuan 鄉愿), embellishment/concealment (wen 文), rituals (li 禮), the equilibrium aimed at between what is naturally given and how it is cultivated (wen zhi bin bin 文質彬彬), the madly ardent (kuang 狂), and the cautiously restrained (juan 獧). The discussion of hypocrisy in the Analects and its further development in the Mengzi 孟子 can be detected in three different forms: (1) speech-action mismatch, (2) inner-outer mismatch, and (3) the village pleasers, those who try to please everyone and seek their own survival and success irrespective of any objective moral principles. My hope is to clarify what Confucius and Mengzi did say about hypocrisy in order to “clear the ground” so that readers of Confucianism do not jump to a conclusion that reads Confucianism itself as hypocritical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angle, Stephen. 2013. “Is Conscientiousness a Virtue? Confucian Answers.” In Virtue Ethics and Confucianism, edited by Stephen Angle and Michael Slote. New York and London: Routledge.

  • Arendt, Hannah. 1963. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: Viking Press.

  • Arendt, Hannah. 1971. The Life of the Mind—Groundbreaking Investigation on How We Think. San Diego and New York: A Harvest Book.

  • Batson, C. Daniel, and Elizabeth R. Thompson. 2001. “Why Don’t Moral People Act Morally? Motivational Considerations.” Current Directions in Psychological Science: A Journal of the American Psychological Society 10.2: 54–57.

  • Bloom, Irene, trans. 2009. Mencius. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Burdman, Javier. 2019. “Between Banality and Radicality: Arendt and Kant on Evil and Responsibility.” European Journal of Political Theory 18.2: 174–194.

  • Cesarani, David. 2006. Becoming Eichmann: Rethinking the Life, Crimes and Trial of aDesk Murderer.” Lebanon: Da Capo Press.

  • Crisp, Roger, and Christopher Cowton. 1994. “Hypocrisy and Moral Seriousness.” American Philosophical Quarterly 31.4: 343–34.

  • Deng, Xiaomang 鄧曉芒. 2005. “The Confucian ‘Village Pleasers’—Viewed through the Lens of Kant’s Moral Philosophy 從康德的道德哲學看儒家的鄉愿.” Zhejiang Academic Journal 浙江學刊 1: 79–85.

  • Deng, Xiaomang 鄧曉芒. 2018. “On How Kant’s Ethics May Save Confucian Ethics 論康德哲學對儒家倫理的救贖.” Exploration and Free Views 探索與爭鳴 2018.2: 64–70.

  • Freud, Sigmund. 1915. “Thoughts for the Times on War and Death.” Trans. By James Strachey. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud 14: 273–300. https://pep-web.org/browse/document/SE.014.0273A?page=P0273 (last accessed on October 19, 2023).

  • Ge, Quan 葛荃. 2008. “Political Personalities: The Madly Ardent, the Cautiously Restrained, the Village Pleaser, and the Fake Exemplary Person—In the Opinions of Several Members of the Dong Lin Group in Late Ming Dynasty 作為政治人格的狂狷、鄉愿與偽君子——以晚明東林諸君見解為據.” Dong Yue Tribune 東嶽論叢 6: 133–138.

  • Hayek, F. A. 1989. The Fatal Conceit—The Errors of Socialism. Vol. 1 of The Collected Works of F. A. Hayek, edited by W. W. Bartley III. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Jordan, J. J., R. Sommers, P. Bloom, and D. G. Rand. 2017. “Why Do We Hate Hypocrites? Evidence for a Theory of False Signaling.” Psychological Science 28.3: 356–368.

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1996. “The Doctrine of Virtue.” In The Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. and edited by Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. by Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kittay, Eva Feder. 1982. “On Hypocrisy.” Metaphilosophy 13.3–4: 277–289.

  • Lau, D. C., trans. 1998. The Analects. London: Penguin Classics.

  • Lau, D. C., trans. 2004. Mencius, rev. ed. London: Penguin Classics.

  • Legge, James. 2006–2023. “The Chinese Classics, volume 1,” published in 1861. In Chinese Text Project, edited by Donald Sturgeon. https://ctext.org/analects/zi-lu (last accessed on October 29, 2023).

  • Li, Zehou 李澤厚. 2015. Reading the Analects Today 論語今讀. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.

  • Liji: Biaoji 禮記·表記. 2006–2023. In Chinese Text Project, edited by Donald Sturgeon. https://ctext.org/liji/biao-ji (last accessed on May 15, 2023).

  • Liu, Yunchao 劉云超. 2016. “Xunzi’s Conception of Human Nature and His Alleged View of ‘Village Pleasers’ 生命的延續與荀學之 ‘鄉愿’——兼論荀學人性論起點是生命意識.” Dong Yue Tribune 東嶽論叢 8: 112–120.

  • Lönnqvist, Jan-Erik, Bernd Irlenbusch, and Gari Walkowitz. 2014. “Moral Hypocrisy: Impression Management or Self-deception?” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 55: 53–6.

  • McKinnon, Christine. 1991. “Hypocrisy, with a Note on Integrity.” American Philosophical Quarterly 28.4: 321–330.

  • Monin, Benoît, and Anna Merritt. 2012. “Moral Hypocrisy, Moral Inconsistency, and the Struggle for Moral Integrity.” In The Social Psychology of Morality: Exploring the Causes of Good and Evil, edited by Mario Mikulincer and Phillip R. Shaver. Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.

  • Ni, Peimin. 2017. Understanding the Analects of Confucius: A New Translation of Lunyu with Annotations. Albany: SUNY Press.

  • Nietzsche, Fredrick. 1966. Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Trans. by Walter Kaufmann. New York: The Viking Press, Inc.

  • Qin, Hui 秦暉. 2008. “Hypocrisy Has an Important Social Function 偽善是社會很重要的功能.” http://www.eeo.com.cn/zt/50forum/tuijian/2008/06/25/104309.shtml (last accessed on October 20, 2023).

  • Sassower, Raphael. 2020. The Specter of Hypocrisy: Testing the Limits of Moral Discourse. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Shklar, Judith N. 1984. Ordinary Vices. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

  • Stangneth, Bettina. 2015. Eichmann Before Jerusalem: The Unexamined Life of a Mass Murderer. Trans. by Ruth Martin. New York: Vintage.

  • Sung, Winnie. 2016. “Xiang Yuan: The Appearance-only Hypocrite.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 15.2: 175–192.

  • Szabados, Bela, and Eldon Soifer. 2004. Hypocrisy: Ethical Investigations. Peterborough: Broadview Press.

  • Waley, Arthur, trans. 1989. The Analects of Confucius. New York: Vintage.

  • Watson, Burton, trans. 2003. Xunzi: Basic Writings. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Watson, Burton, trans. 2007. The Analects of Confucius. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • White, Thomas. 2018. “What Did Hannah Arendt Really Mean by the Banality of Evil?” Aeon. https://aeon.co/ideas/what-did-hannah-arendt-really-mean-by-the-banality-of-evil (last accessed on October 24, 2023).

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1958. Philosophical Investigations, 2nd ed. Trans. by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

  • Wu, Bao-Pei, and Gao Shu-Ling. 2012. “Moral Hypocrisy: An Opportunistic Adaptive Strategy.” Advances in Psychological Science 20.6: 926–934.

Download references

Acknowledgment

I want to thank Patrick Moran and Tanya Tomasch for correcting my English in this article. I also thank Kwantlen Polytechnic University for supporting the writing of this article, and thank Bert Plant for a number of references to the Bible with one course release.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Puqun Li.

Ethics declarations

Declaration

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, P. Hypocrisy as Described in the Analects and the Mengzi. Dao 23, 39–57 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-023-09919-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-023-09919-2

Keywords

Navigation