Abstract
This paper reflects on two ideas addressed in Benoît Vermander’s essay “Edit by Number.” First, how can we apply “coherence in structure” to the historical development of textual production and edition in ancient China? And second, what concept of number underlies the considerations in the Huáinán Zǐ 淮南子? To answer the first question, this article compares the different compositional patterns of texts that, as with the Lǎo Zǐ 老子and the Yì Jīng 易經, are available to us in different versions. The result of the comparison shows that the differences seem to outweigh the coherent patterns, so we must assume that some texts have undergone very large changes historically. Regarding the concept of number, different views on number are highlighted in texts of the Warring States Period and the Hàn 漢 dynasty, which shows that the Huáinán Zǐ contains a very specific concept of number and its own theory of the One.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bān, Gù 班固. 1962. Book of the Former Hàn Dynasty 漢書. Běijīng 北京: Zhōnghuá Shūjù 中華書局.
Boltz, William G. 2005. “The Composite Nature of Early Chinese Texts.” In Text and Ritual in Early China, edited by Martin Kern. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
D’Ooge, Martin Luther, trans. 1926. Nicomachus of Gerasa: Introduction to Arithmetic. New York: Macmillan.
Graham, A. C. 1993. “The Way and the One in He-kuan-tzu.” In Epistemological Issues in Classical Chinese Philosophy, edited by Hans Lenk and Gregor Paul. Albany: State University of New York Press. pp. 31–43.
Granet, Marcel. 1985. Das chinesische Denken. Inhalt, Form, Charakter. Trans. by Manfred Porkert. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Guō, Qìngfán 郭慶藩. 1982. Zhūang Zǐ with Collected Explanations 莊子集釋. Běijīng 北京: Zhōnghuá Shūjú 中華書局.
Hé, Níng 何寧. 2016. The Huáinán Zǐ with Collected Explanations 淮南子集釋. Běijīng 北京: Zhōnghuá Shūjú 中華書局.
Jīngmén Municipal Museum 荊門市博物館, ed. 1998. The Guōdiàn Chǔ Manuscripts: Lǎo Zǐ 郭店楚墓竹简老子. Běijīng 北京: Wénwù Chūbǎnshè 文物出版社.
Lau, D. C. 1982. Tao Te Ching. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
______ 劉殿爵. 2013. Text and Textual Criticism of the Huainan Zi with Rhymes Marked《淮南子》韻讀及校勘. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
Major, John S., Sarah Queen, Andrew Meyer, and Harold D. Roth, trans. 2010. The Huainanzi: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Government in Early Han China. New York: Columbia University Press.
Nielsen, Bent. 2003. A Companion to Yi Jing Numerology and Cosmology. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
Otisk, Marek. 2022. “The Definitions of Number in Boethius’s Introduction to Arithmetic.” Philosophical Readings 14.1: 16–26.
Sīmǎ, Qiān 司馬遷. 1982. The Grand Scribe’s Records 史記. Běijīng 北京: Zhōnghuá Shūjù 中華書局.
Solomon, Bernard. 1954. “‘One Is No Number’ in China and The West.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 17.1/2: 253–260.
Vermander, Benoît. 2021. “Edit by Number: Looking at the Composition of the Huainanzi, and Beyond.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 20.4: 459–498.
Wāng, Zhōng 汪中. 1967. Transmitting Learning 述學. In The Collected Edition of the Four Sections [of Literature], First Series, downsized facsimile reprint 四部叢刊初編縮本, edited by Wáng Yúnwǔ 王雲五, vol. 290. Taipei 台北: Táiwān Shāngwù Yìnshūguǎn 台灣商務印書館.
Wáng, Zhōngjiāng 王中江. 2017. “The Unfolding and the Forms of the Idea of the One in Early Daoism 早期道家 ‘一’ 的思想的展開及其形態.” Chinese Philosophy 中國哲學 7: 51–63.
______. 2023. “Further Treatment of the Conceptual Development of the One in Early Daoism 早期道家 ‘一’ 的概念演變餘論.” The Central Plains Cultural Research 中原文化研究 1: 13–24.
Weingarten, Oliver. 2009. “Confucius and Pregnant Women: An Investigation into the Intertextuality of the ‘Lunyu’.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 19.4: 597–618.
Zürn, Tobias B. 2020. “The Han Imaginaire of Writing as Weaving: Intertextuality and the Huainanzi’s Self-Fashioning as an Embodiment of the Way.” Journal of Asian Studies 79.2: 367–402.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Declaration
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Schilling, D. Edit by Number: A Response. Dao 22, 633–646 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-023-09910-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-023-09910-x