Skip to main content
Log in

Confucius and the Hen-Pheasant: The Enigma at the Center of the Analects

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 17 August 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

The last sentence of Chapter 10 of the Analects describes a brief encounter between Confucius and a hen-pheasant, and it does so in puzzling terms, ridden with lexical difficulties. At the same time, intertextual references insert this fragment into the context of Confucius’ life mission as well as of Chinese mythological narratives. This contribution assesses the fragment’s meaning and significance: Confucius’ reaction to the hen-pheasant unveils his evolving understanding of the Heavenly Mandate bestowed upon him. The fragment thus forcefully concludes the chapter in which it is inserted. Additionally, I put forward a hypothesis: the focus of this narrative, coupled with its positioning at the end of Chapter 10, induce us to postulate that it may have been purposefully located at the very center of the Analects, a proposition that reverberates on the way we look at the composition of the book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  • Ban, Gu 班固. 2012. History of the Han 漢書. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.

  • Billeter, Jean-François. 2015. Trois essais sur la traduction. Paris: Allia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, E. Bruce, and A. Takeo Brooks. 2001. The Original Analects: Sayings of Confucius and His Successors. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campany, Robert F. 2005. “The Meanings of Cuisines of Transcendence in Late Classical and Early Medieval China.” T’oung Pao 91.3: 1–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Xiaofen 陳曉芬, and Xu Ruzong 徐儒宗. 2011. The Analects, The Great Learning, The Doctrine of the Mean 論語、大學、中庸. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.

  • Cheng, Shude 程樹德. 2013. Collection of Commentaries on the Analects 論語集釋, 2 vols. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.

  • Cheng, Shiquan 程石泉. 2004. Reading of the Analects with Textual Analysis 論語讀訓. Shanghai 上海: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe 上海古籍出版社.

  • Douglas, Mary. 2007. Thinking in Circles: An Essay on Ring Composition. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durrant, Stephen, Wai-yee Li, and David Schaberg, trans. 2016. Zuo Tradition / Zuozhuan: Commentary on the “Spring and Autumn Annals. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Tao 方韜, ed. 2009. Classic of Mountains and Seas 山海經. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.

  • Fang, Yong 方勇, and Li Bo 李波, trans. 2015. Xunzi 荀子. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.

  • Granet, Marcel. 1926/1994. Danses et légendes de la Chine ancienne. Paris: PUF.

  • Harbsmeier, Christoph. 2019. “The Authenticity and Nature of the Analects of Confucius.” Journal of Chinese Studies 中國文化學報 68: 171–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Wenhui 胡文輝. 2000. A Collection of Early Chinese Occult Techniques and Documents 中國早期方術與文獻叢考. Guangzhou 廣州: Zhongshan Daxue Chubanshe 中山大學出版社.

  • Huang, Huaixin 黄懷信. 2008. A Collection of Interpretations of the Analects 論語彙校集釋. Shanghai 上海: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe 上海古籍出版社.

  • Huang, Hui 黃暉. 2018. A Collection of Interpretations of the Balanced Discourses [of Wang Chong] 論衡校釋. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.

  • Hunter, Michael. 2017. Confucius beyond the Analects. Leiden: Brill.

  • Hutton, Eric L. 2014. Xunzi: The Complete Text. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Itô, Jinsai 伊藤仁斋. 1909. The Ancient Meaning of the Analects 論語古義. Tokyo 東京: Rokumeikan 六盟館.

  • Jiang, Peichang 蔣沛昌. 1999. A New Interpretation of the Analects of Confucius 論語今釋. Changsha 長沙: Yuelu Shudian 岳麓書店.

  • Kim, Kyung-ho. 2019. “Popularization of the Analects of Confucius in Western Han and the Discovery of the Qi Lun: With a Focus on the Bamboo Slips Unearthed from the Haihunhou Tomb.” Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies 19.2: 213–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Tae Hyun, and Mark Csikszentmihalyi. 2014. “History and Formation of the Analects.” In Dao Companion to the Analects, edited by Amy Olberding. Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Lagerwey, John. 2010. China: A Religious State. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, D. C. 2000. Confucius: The Analects. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei, Qingyi 雷慶翼. 2007. “Discussion and Analysis of the Sesiju Section in the Analects 《論語》 ‘色斯舉’ 章辨析.” Research on Confucius 孔子研究 6: 113–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Jean. 2018. Les deux arbres de la Voie. (II) Les Entretiens de Confucius. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.

  • Leys, Simon. 1997. The Analects of Confucius. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, Mingchun 廖名春. 2014. “A New Examination of the Sesijuyi Section of the ‘Xiangdang’ Chapter in the Analects—With a Commentary on the ‘Xue’er’ and ‘Weizheng’ Chapters, and the Silk Manuscript Wu Xing as to the Expressions Yise, Se’nan, and Seran《論語‧鄉黨》篇 ‘色斯舉矣’ 章新證—兼釋《學而》《為政》、帛書《五行》篇的 ‘易色’ ‘色難’ ‘色然’.” Journal of Sichuan University – Philosophy and Social Sciences 四川大學學報‧哲學社會科學版 5: 5–11.

  • Lu, Yanjun 陸岩軍. 2014. “A New Explanation of the ‘Se Si Ju Yi’ Chapter in the Analects《論語》‘色斯舉矣’ 章新解.” Research on Confucius 孔子研究 2: 45–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makeham, John. 1996. “The Formation of Lunyu as a Book.” Monumenta Serica 44: 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meynet, Roland. 2012. Treatise on Biblical Rhetoric. Leiden: Brill.

  • ______. 2015. “Rhétorique biblique, rhétorique de l'énigme.” Rhetorica 33.2: 147–180.

  • Ni, Peimin. 2017. Understanding the Analects of Confucius: A New Translation of Lunyu with Annotations. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, Martin. 2014. Confucius: The Most Venerable Book (Shangshu). London: Penguin Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puett, Michael. 2005. “Listening to Sages: Divination, Omens, and the Rhetoric of Antiquity in Wang Chong’s Lunheng.” Oriens Extremus 45: 271–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slingerland, Edward. 2003. Confucius Analects: With Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Indianapolis: Hackett.

  • Song, Yunwoo. 2019. “The Emergence of the Notion of Predetermined Fate in Early China.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 18.4: 509-526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2020. “Wang Chong’s Fatalism.” Early China 43: 285–310.

  • Van Els, Paul. 2018. “Confucius’ Sayings Entombed: On Two Han Dynasty Bamboo Lunyu Manuscripts.” In Confucius and the Analects Revisited: New Perspectives on Composition, Dating, and Authorship, edited by Michael Hunter and Martin Kern. Leiden: Brill.

  • Van Els, Paul, and Sarah A. Queen. 2017. “Introduction.” In Between History and Philosophy: Anecdotes in Early China, edited by Paul van Els and Sarah A. Queen. Albany: SUNY Press.

  • Vermander, Benoît. 2021. “Edit by Number: Looking at the Composition of the Huainanzi, and Beyond.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 20.3: 459–498.

  • ______. 2022. Comment lire les classiques chinois? Paris: Les Belles Lettres.

  • Wang, Jia 王嘉. 2018. Forgotten Tales [gathered by] Wang Zinian [Wang Jia] 王子年拾遺記. Ji’nan 濟南: Shandong Renmin Chubanshe 山東人民出版社.

  • Wang, Shiwu 王世舞, and Wang Cuiye 王翠葉, eds. 2012. The Venerated Documents [Book of Documents] 尚書. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.

  • Wang, Xiumei 王秀梅, ed. 2015. Classic of Odes 詩經. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.

  • Wu, Zhu 吳柱. 2020. “The Timely Manner of Confucius and the Personality Symbolism of Birds and Beasts: A New Interpretation of Analects 10.27孔子的時宜之道與鳥獸的人格象徵: 《論語》「山梁雌雉」章新釋論.” Journal of Chinese Studies 中國文化研究所學報 71: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Liuqiao 楊柳橋, ed. and trans. 2007. The Zhuangzi: Annotated and Translated 莊子譯註. Shanghai 上海: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe 上海古籍出版社.

  • Yang, Tiancai 楊天才, and Zhang Shanwen 張善文, eds. 2011. Classic of Changes 周易. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.

  • Yang, Yi 楊義. 2015. Genesis of Confucius’ Analects 論語還原. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.

  • You, Minjung. 2018. “New Trends in Commentary on the Confucian Classics: Characteristics, Differences, and Significance of Rhetorically Oriented Exegeses of the Mengzi.” Acta Koreana 21.2: 503–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Xi 朱熹. 2014. A Compilation of the Conversations of Master Chu, Arranged Topically 朱子語類匯校. Edited by Huang Shiyi 黄士毅. Shanghai 上海: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe 上海古籍出版社.

  • Zufferey, Nicolas. 1995. “Pourquoi Wang Chong critique-t-il Confucius?” Études chinoises 14.1: 25–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benoît Vermander.

Ethics declarations

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised due to error in the main body text.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vermander, B. Confucius and the Hen-Pheasant: The Enigma at the Center of the Analects. Dao 22, 351–377 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-023-09890-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-023-09890-y

Keywords

Navigation