Skip to main content
Log in

Correlation of chloride diffusion coefficient and microstructure parameters in concrete: A comparative analysis using NMR, MIP, and X-CT

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Permeability is a major indicator of concrete durability, and depends primarily on the microstructure characteristics of concrete, including its porosity and pore size distribution. In this study, a variety of concrete samples were prepared to investigate their microstructure characteristics via nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), and X-ray computed tomography (X-CT). Furthermore, the chloride diffusion coefficient of concrete was measured to explore its correlation with the microstructure of the concrete samples. Results show that the proportion of pores with diameters < 1000 nm obtained by NMR exceeds that obtained by MIP, although the difference in the total porosity determined by both methods is minimal. X-CT measurements obtained a relatively small porosity; however, this likely reflects the distribution of large pores more accurately. A strong correlation is observed between the chloride diffusion coefficient and the porosity or contributive porosity of pores with sizes < 1000 nm. Moreover, microstructure parameters measured via NMR reveal a lower correlation coefficient R2 versus the chloride diffusion coefficient relative to the parameters determined via MIP, as NMR can measure non-connected as well as connected pores. In addition, when analyzing pores with sizes > 50 µm, X-CT obtains the maximal contributive porosity, followed by MIP and NMR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexander M G, Magee B J. Durability performance of concrete containing condensed silica fume. Cement and Concrete Research, 1999, 29(6): 917–922

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yang L F, Cai R, Yu B. Investigation of computational model for surface chloride concentration of concrete in marine atmosphere zone. Ocean Engineering, 2017, 138: 105–111

    Google Scholar 

  3. Isgor O B, Razaqpur A G. Modelling steel corrosion in concrete structures. Materials and Structures, 2007, 39(3): 291–302

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wu L J, Li W, Yu X N. Time-dependent chloride penetration in concrete in marine environments. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 152: 406–113

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aldea C M, Shah S P, Karr A. Effect of cracking on water and chloride permeability of concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 1999, 11(3): 181–187

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yu Y N, Yu J S, Ge Y. Water and chloride permeability research on ordinary cement mortar and concrete with compound admixture and fly ash. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 127: 556–564

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yang Y, Wang M. Pore-scale modeling of chloride ion diffusion in cement microstructures. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2018, 85: 92–104

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bágel’ L’, Živica V. Relationship between pore structure and permeability of hardened cement mortars: On the choice of effective pore structure parameter. Cement and Concrete Research, 1997, 27(8): 1225–1235

    Google Scholar 

  9. Das B B, Kondraivendhan B. Implication of pore size distribution parameters on compressive strength, permeability and hydraulic diffusivity of concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2012, 28(1): 382–386

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang Z Q, Zhang B, Yan P Y. Hydration and microstructures of concrete containing raw or densified silica fume at different curing temperatures. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 121: 483–490

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mun K J, So S Y, Soh Y S. The effect of slaked lime, anhydrous gypsum and limestone powder on properties of blast furnace slag cement mortar and concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2007, 21(7): 1576–1582

    Google Scholar 

  12. Powers T C, Brownyard T L. Studies of the physical properties of hardened Portland cement paste. Concrete International, 2003, 41: 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mehta P K, Paulo J M. Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, Materials. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Press, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang M H, Li H. Pore structure and chloride permeability of concrete containing nano-particles for pavement. Construction & Building Materials, 2011, 25(2): 608–616

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Pipilikaki P, Beazi-Katsioti M. The assessment of porosity and pore size distribution of limestone Portland cement pastes. Construction & Building Materials, 2009, 23(5): 1966–1970

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou J, Ye G, van Breugel K. Cement hydration and microstructure in concrete repairs with cementitious repair materials. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 112: 765–772

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tanaka K, Kurumisawa K. Development of technique for observing pores in hardened cement paste. Cement and Concrete Research, 2002, 32(9): 1435–1441

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liu J, Ou G F, Qiu Q W, Chen X C, Hong J, Xing F. Chloride transport and microstructure of concrete with/without fly ash under atmospheric chloride condition. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 146: 493–501

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stark J. Recent advances in the field of cement hydration and microstructure analysis. Cement and Concrete Research, 2011, 41(7): 666–678

    Google Scholar 

  20. Brue F, Davy C A, Skoczylas F, Burlion N, Bourbon X. Effect of temperature on the water retention properties of two high performance concretes. Cement and Concrete Research, 2012, 42(2): 384–396

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liu J, Xing F, Dong B Q, Ma H Y, Pan D. Study on water sorptivity of the surface layer of concrete. Materials and Structures, 2014, 47(11): 1941–1951

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kong D L Y, Sanjayan J G, Sagoe-Crentsil K. Comparative performance of geopolymers made with metakaolin and fly ash after exposure to elevated temperatures. Cement and Concrete Research, 2007, 37(12): 1583–1589

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tian H H, Wei C F, Wei H Z, Yan R T, Chen P. An NMR-based analysis of soil-water characteristics. Applied Magnetic Resonance, 2014, 45(1): 49–61

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tian H H, Wei C F, Wei H Z, Zhou J Z. Freezing and thawing characteristics of frozen soils: Bound water content and hysteresis phenomenon. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2014, 103: 74–81

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wang X X, Shen X D, Wang H L, Zhao H X. Nuclear magnetic resonance analysis of air entraining natural pumice concrete freeze-thaw damage. Advanced Materials Research, 2014, 919–921: 1939–1943

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yao Y B, Liu D M. Comparison of low-field NMR and mercury intrusion porosimetry in characterizing pore size distributions of coals. Fuel, 2012, 95: 152–158

    Google Scholar 

  27. du Plessis A, Olawuyi B J, Boshoff W P, le Roux S G. Simple and fast porosity analysis of concrete using X-ray computed tomography. Materials and Structures, 2016, 49(1–2): 553–562

    Google Scholar 

  28. Huang Y J, Yang Z J, Ren W Y, Liu G H, Zhang C. 3D meso-scale fracture modelling and validation of concrete based on in-situ X-ray computed tomography images using damage plasticity model. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2015, 67–68: 340–352

    Google Scholar 

  29. Qin X, Xu Q. Statistical analysis of initial defects between concrete layers of dam using X-ray computed tomography. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 125: 1101–1113

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang J Z, Guo J, Li D H, Zhang Y R, Bian F, Fang Z F. The influence of admixture on chloride time-varying diffusivity and microstructure of concrete by low-field NMR. Ocean Engineering, 2017, 142: 94–101

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang J Z, Bian F, Zhang Y R, Fang Z F, Fu C Q, Guo J. Effect of pore structures on gas permeability and chloride diffusivity of concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 163: 402–413

    Google Scholar 

  32. Feng N Q, Xing F. High performance concrete technology. Beijing: Atomic Energy Press, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  33. Feng N Q, Feng X X, Hao T Y, Xing F. Effect of ultrafine mineral powder on the charge passed of the concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 2002, 32(4): 623–627

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ye G. Percolation of capillary pores in hardening cement pastes. Cement and Concrete Research, 2005, 35(1): 167–176

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kumar R, Bhattacharjee B. Study on some factors affecting the results in the use of MIP method in concrete research. Cement and Concrete Research, 2003, 33(3): 417–424

    Google Scholar 

  36. Diamond S. Mercury porosimetry: An inappropriate method for the measurement of pore size distributions in cement-based materials. Cement and Concrete Research, 2000, 30(10): 1517–1525

    Google Scholar 

  37. Li B, Mao J Z, Nawa T, Han T Y. Mesoscopic damage model of concrete subjected to freeze-thaw cycles using mercury intrusion porosimetry and differential scanning calorimetry (MIP-DSC). Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 147: 79–90

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang Y, Verwaal W, van de Ven MFC, Molenaar AAA, Wu S P. Using high-resolution industrial CT scan to detect the distribution of rejuvenation products in porous asphalt concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2015, 100: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  39. Huang Y J, Yan D M, Yang Z J, Liu G H. 2D and 3D homogenization and fracture analysis of concrete based on in-situ X-ray computed tomography images and monte carlo simulations. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2016, 163: 37–54

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zhou J, Ye G, van Breugel K. Characterization of pore structure in cement-based materials using pressurization-depressurization cycling mercury intrusion porosimetry (PDC-MIP). Cement and Concrete Research, 2010, 40(7): 1120–1128

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wang Y, Yuan Q, Deng D H, Ye T, Fang L. Measuring the pore structure of cement asphalt mortar by nuclear magnetic resonance. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 137: 450–458

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zhou Y, Hou D S, Jiang J Y, Wang P G. Chloride ions transport and adsorption in the nano-pores of silicate calcium hydrate: Experimental and molecular dynamics studies. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 126: 991–1001

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sun C, Bai B. Diffusion of gas molecules on multilayer graphene surfaces: Dependence on the number of graphene layers. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 116: 724–730

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sun W G, Sun W, Wang C H. Relationship between the transport behavior of modern concrete and its microstructures: Research methods and progress. Materials Review, 2018, 32: 3010–3022

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang P, Wittmann F H, Zhao T J, Lehmann E H, Vontobel P. Neutron radiography, a powerful method to determine time-dependent moisture distributions in concrete. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2011, 241(12): 4758–4766

    Google Scholar 

  46. Korat L, Ducman V, Legat A, Mirtic B. Characterisation of the pore-forming process in lightweight aggregate based on silica sludge by means of X-ray micro-tomography (micro-CT) and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). Ceramics International, 2013, 39(6): 6997–7005

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the financial supports provided by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LY17E090007, LQ18G010007, and LY19E90006) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51279181). Moreover, thanks are due to Wang J D, Feng X X, Shao X J and Wang M for assistance with the experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junzhi Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Xu, S., Gao, Y. et al. Correlation of chloride diffusion coefficient and microstructure parameters in concrete: A comparative analysis using NMR, MIP, and X-CT. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 14, 1509–1519 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0681-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0681-9

Keywords

Navigation