Abstract
Laparoscopic elective splenectomy is considered as a safe surgical treatment of spleen non-traumatic blood disorders. However, robotic assisted splenectomy is becoming a promising alternative, although there are scarce studies in pediatric patients. Our aim is to compare the effectiveness and associated costs of both procedures in children. A single-institution retrospective study was performed among consecutive children undergoing splenectomy between 2004 and 2021, who were divided according to the surgical approach: LAS group (laparoscopic splenectomy) and RAS group (robotic assisted splenectomy). Demographics, clinical features, intraoperative blood loss, surgery time, length of hospital stay (LOS), postoperative complications, need for postoperative blood transfusion, readmission rate and economic data were compared. A total of 84 patients were included (23 LAS group; 61 RAS group), without demographic or clinical differences between them. RAS patients presented lower intraoperative blood loss (42 ± 15 vs. 158 ± 39 ml; p < 0.021) and shorter surgery time (135 ± 39 vs. 182 ± 68 min; p = 0.043), with no differences in median LOS (3 days in both groups). No intraoperative complications or conversion was reported. Five postoperative complications were observed: 4 in LAS patients (17.4%) versus only one in RAS (1.6%; p = 0.021). One reintervention was required in LAS group due to hemoperitoneum 12 h after splenectomy. RAS patients had lower postoperative blood transfusion requirements (1.6% vs. 13.0%; p = 0.025) and lower readmission rate (3.3 vs. 17.4%; p = 0.042). No differences were observed when comparing the median economic costs ($25,645 LAS vs. $28,135 RAS; p = 0.215). Robotic assisted splenectomy may be considered as a safe and feasible option in children compared to the traditional laparoscopic approach. Level of evidence: III.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable.
References
Iolascon A, Andolfo I, Barcellini W, Corcione F, Garçon L, De Franceschi L, Working Study Group on Red Cells and Iron of the EHA (2017) Recommendations regarding splenectomy in hereditary hemolytic anemias. Haematologica 102:1304–1313
Delaitre B, Maignien B, Icard P (1992) Laparoscopic splenectomy. Br J Surg 79:1334
Cavaliere D, Solaini L, Di Pietrantonio D, D’Acapito F, Tauceri F, Framarini M et al (2018) Robotic vs laparoscopic splenectomy for splenomegaly: a retrospective comparative cohort study. Int J Surg 55:1–4
Bhattacharya P, Phelan L, Fisher S, Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S (2022) Robotic vs. laparoscopic splenectomy in management of non-traumatic splenic pathologies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am Surg 88:38–47
Peng F, Lai L, Luo M, Su S, Zhang M, He K et al (2020) Comparison of early postoperative results between robot-assisted and laparoscopic splenectomy for non-traumatic splenic diseases rather than portal hypertensive hypersplenism-a meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 43:36–43
Pepper VK, Rager TM, Diefenbach KA, Raval MV, Teich S, Michalsky MP (2016) Robotic vs. laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in adolescents; reality or hype. Obes Surg 26:1912–1917
Belbahri I, Planchamp T, Ait Aissa D, Larcher C, Mouttalib S, Le Mandat A et al (2023) Pediatric mini-invasive splenectomy comparing laparoscopy with or without robotic approach: a single-center study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 33:703–706
Shelby R, Kulaylat AN, Villella A, Michalsky MP, Diefenbach KA, Aldrink JH (2021) A comparison of robotic-assisted splenectomy and laparoscopic splenectomy for children with hematologic disorders. J Pediatr Surg 56:1047–1050
Thompson H, Jones C, Pardy C, Kufeji D, Nichols E, Murphy F, Davenport M (2020) Application of the Clavien-Dindo classification to a pediatric surgical network. J Pediatr Surg 55:312–315
Han H, Hensch L, Tubman VN (2021) Indications for transfusion in the management of sickle cell disease. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2021(1):696–703
Linder GE, Chou ST (2021) Red cell transfusion and alloimmunization in sickle cell disease. Haematologica 106(7):1805–1815
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, STROBE Initiative (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370:1453–1457
Neunert CE, Cooper N (2018) Evidence-based management of immune thrombocytopenia: ASH guideline update. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2018:568–575
Mbaka MI, Robl E, Camps JI (2017) Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted splenectomy in the pediatric population: our institutional experience. Am Surg 83:e358–e359
Bodner J, Kafka-Ritsch R, Lucciarini P, Fish JH 3rd, Schmid T (2005) A critical comparison of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic splenectomies. World J Surg 29:982–985
Bennett WE Jr, Whittam BM, Szymanski KM, Rink RC, Cain MP, Carroll AE (2017) Validated cost comparison of open vs. robotic pyeloplasty in American children’s hospitals. J Robot Surg 11:201–206
Ingle SS, Ubale P (2011) Anesthetic management of a patient with sickle cell disease for common bile duct exploration. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 27:547–549
Giza DE, Tudor S, Purnichescu-Purtan RR, Vasilescu C (2014) Robotic splenectomy: what is the real benefit? World J Surg 38:3067–3073
Meehan JJ, Sandler A (2008) Pediatric robotic surgery: a single-institutional review of the first 100 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 22:177–182
Delgado-Miguel C, Camps JI (2022) Robotic Soave pull-through procedure for Hirschsprung’s disease in children under 12-months: long-term outcomes. Pediatr Surg Int 38:51–57
Delgado-Miguel C, Camps JI (2023) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic redo antireflux surgery in children: a cost-effectiveness study. Int J Med Robot. 2023:e2541
O’Kelly F, Farhat WA, Koyle MA (2020) Cost, training and simulation models for robotic-assisted surgery in pediatric urology. World J Urol 38:1875–1882
Funding
The authors have not disclosed any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All the authors contributed to the study conception and design. Carlos Delgado-Miguel collected the patients’ data, analyzed and interpreted them, and wrote the manuscript. Juan Camps performed critical revision, reviewed and corrected the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Ethical approval
The protocol of the study obtained the approval of Prisma Health Children’s Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB number 1945724-1) and complied with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Delgado-Miguel, C., Camps, J.I. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic splenectomy in children: a costeffectiveness study. J Robotic Surg 18, 51 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01783-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01783-9