Abstract
Afforestation has an important role in biodiversity conservation and ecosystem function improvement. A meta-analysis was carried out in China, which has the largest plantation area globally, to quantify the effects of plantings on soil microbial diversity. The results showed that the overall effect of afforestation on soil microbial diversity was positive across the country. Random forest algorithm suggested that soil carbon was the most important factor regulating microbial diversity and the positive response was only found with new plantings on low-carbon bare lands but not on high-carbon farmlands and grasslands. In addition, afforestation with broadleaved species increased microbial diversity, whereas planting with conifers had no effect on microbial diversity. This study clarified the effects of plantings on soil microbial diversity, which has an important implication for establishing appropriate policies and practices to improve the multiple functionalities (e.g., biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation) during plantation establishment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aronson J, Goodwin N, Orlando L, Eisenberg C, Cross AT (2020) A world of possibilities: six restoration strategies to support the United Nation’s Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. Restor Ecol 28(4):730–736. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13170
Bååth E (1996) Adaptation of soil bacterial communities to prevailing pH in different soils. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 19(4):227–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.1996.tb00215.x
Bahram M, Hildebrand F, Forslund SK, Anderson JL, Soudzilovskaia NA, Bodegom PM, Bengtsson-Palme J, Anslan S, Coelho LP, Harend H (2018) Structure and function of the global topsoil microbiome. Nature 560:233–237. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0386-6
Bai YH, Zha X, Chen SF (2020) Effects of the vegetation restoration years on soil microbial community composition and biomass in degraded lands in Changting County, China. J For Res 31:1295–1308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-019-00879-z
Bastida F, Eldridge DJ, García C, Png GK, Bardgett RD, Delgado-Baquerizo M (2021) Soil microbial diversity-biomass relationships are driven by soil carbon content across global biomes. ISME J 15:2081–2091. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-021-00906-0
Booth IR (1985) Regulation of cytoplasmic pH in bacteria. Microbiol Rev 49:359–378. https://doi.org/10.1128/mr.49.4.359-378.1985
Brockerhoff EG, Jactel H, Parrotta JA, Quine CP, Sayer J (2008) Plantation forests and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity? Biodivers Conserv 17:925–951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9380-x
Cao HY, Gao GL, Zhang Y, Guo MS, Ren Y, Ding GD (2021) Soil bacterial approach to assessing afforestation in the desertfied Northern China. J Clean Prod 292:125935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125935
Caruso T, Chan YK, Lacap DC, Lau MC, McKay CP, Pointing SB (2011) Stochastic and deterministic processes interact in the assembly of desert microbial communities on a global scale. ISME J 5:1406–1413. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.21
Chen C, Park T, Wang XH, Piao SL, Xu BD, Chaturvedi RK, Fuchs R, Brovkin V, Ciais P, Fensholt R (2019) China and India lead in greening of the world through land-use management. Nat Sustain 2:122–129. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0220-7
Delgado-Baquerizo M, Eldridge DJ (2019) Cross-biome drivers of soil bacterial alpha diversity on a worldwide scale. Ecosystems 22:1220–1231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-018-0333-2
Delgado-Baquerizo M, Maestre FT, Reich PB, Jeffries TC, Gaitan JJ, Encinar D, Berdugo M, Campbell CD, Singh BK (2016a) Microbial diversity drives multifunctionality in terrestrial ecosystems. Nat Commun 7:10541. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10541
Delgado-Baquerizo M, Maestre FT, Reich PB, Trivedi P, Osanai Y, Liu YR, Hamonts K, Jeffries TC, Singh BK (2016b) Carbon content and climate variability drive global soil bacterial diversity patterns. Ecol Monogr 86:373–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1216
Delgado-Baquerizo M, Reich PB, Khachane AN, Campbell CD, Thomas N, Freitag TE, Abu Al-Soud W, Sørensen S, Bardgett RD, Singh BK (2017) It is elemental: soil nutrient stoichiometry drives bacterial diversity. Environ Microbiol 19(3):1176–1188. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13642
Eisenhauer N, Beßler H, Engels C, Gleixner G, Habekost M, Milcu A, Partsch S, Sabais A, Scherber C, Steinbeiss S (2010) Plant diversity effects on soil microorganisms support the singular hypothesis. Ecology 91(2):485–496. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-2338.1
Fraser LH, Pither J, Jentsch A, Sternberg M, Zobel M, Askarizadeh D, Bartha S, Beierkuhnlein C, Bennett JA, Bittel A (2015) Worldwide evidence of a unimodal relationship between productivity and plant species richness. Science 349(6245):302–305. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab3916
Gao Y, Dang P, Zhao Z (2018) Effects of afforestation on soil carbon and its fractions: a case study from the Loess Plateau, China. J For Res 29:1291–1297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-017-0552-y
Grzyb A, Wolna-Maruwka A, Niewiadomska A (2021) The significance of microbial transformation of nitrogen compounds in the light of integrated crop management. Agronomy 11:1415. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11071415
Guo YQ, Hou LJ, Zhang ZY, Zhang JL, Cheng JM, Wei GH, Lin YB (2019) Soil microbial diversity during 30 years of grassland restoration on the Loess Plateau, China: tight linkages with plant diversity. Land Degrad Dev 30:1172–1182. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3300
Hendershot JN, Read QD, Henning JA, Sanders NJ, Classen AT (2017) Consistently inconsistent drivers of microbial diversity and abundance at macroecological scales. Ecology 98(7):1939–9170. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.1829
Hu HY, Umbreen S, Zhang YL, Bao MZ, Huang CF, Zhou CF (2021) Significant association between soil dissolved organic matter and soil microbial communities following vegetation restoration in the Loess Plateau. Ecol Eng 169:106305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106305
Hüblová L, Frouz J (2021) Contrasting effect of coniferous and broadleaf trees on soil carbon storage during reforestation of forest soils and afforestation of agricultural and post-mining soils. J Environ Manag 290:112567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112567
Kanerva S, Kitunen V, Loponen J, Smolander A (2008) Phenolic compounds and terpenes in soil organic horizon layers under silver birch, Norway spruce and Scots pine. Biol Fertil Soils 44:547–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-007-0234-6
Ke SF, Qiao D, Zhang XX, Feng QY (2019) Changes of China’s forestry and forest products industry over the past 40 years and challenges lying ahead. For Policy Econ 106:101949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101949
Lauber CL, Hamady M, Knight R, Fierer N (2009) Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale. Appl Environ Microbiol 75(15):5111–5120. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00335-09
Leifeld J, Zimmermann M, Fuhrer J (2008) Simulating decomposition of labile soil organic carbon: effects of pH. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2948–2951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.08.019
Liaw A, Wiener M (2002) Classification and regression by randomForest. R News 2:18–22
Liu JG, Li SX, Ouyang ZY, Tam C, Chen XD (2008) Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China’s policies for ecosystem services. PNAS 105(28):9477–9482. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706436105
Liu JL, Dang P, Gao Y, Zhu HL, Zhu HN, Zhao F, Zhao Z (2018) Effects of tree species and soil properties on the composition and diversity of the soil bacterial community following afforestation. For Ecol Manag 427:342–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.06.017
Liu YL, Zhu GY, Hai XY, Li JW, Shangguan ZP, Peng CH, Deng L (2020) Long-term forest succession improves plant diversity and soil quality but not significantly increase soil microbial diversity: evidence from the Loess Plateau. Ecol Eng 142:105631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.105631
Macdonald SE, Fenniak TE (2007) Understory plant communities of boreal mixedwood forests in western Canada: natural patterns and response to variable-retention harvesting. For Ecol Manag 242:34–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.029
Malik AA, Puissant J, Buckeridge KM, Goodall T, Jehmlich N, Chowdhury S, Gweon HS, Peyton JM, Mason KE, Van Agtmaal M (2018) Land use driven change in soil pH affects microbial carbon cycling processes. Nat Commun 9:3591. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05980-1
Meng C, Tian DS, Zeng H, Li ZL, Yi CX, Niu SL (2019) Global soil acidification impacts on belowground processes. Environ Res Lett 14:074003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab239c
Phillips LB, Hansen AJ, Flather CH, Robison-Cox J (2010) Applying species-energy theory to conservation: a case study for North American birds. Ecol Appl 20:2007–2023. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-0580.1
Prescott CE, Grayston SJ (2013) Tree species influence on microbial communities in litter and soil: current knowledge and research needs. For Ecol Manag 309:19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.02.034
Prober SM, Leff JW, Bates ST, Borer ET, Firn J, Harpole WS, Lind EM, Seabloom EW, Adler PB, Bakker JD (2015) Plant diversity predicts beta but not alpha diversity of soil microbes across grasslands worldwide. Ecol Lett 18:85–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12381
Rengel Z (2011) Soil pH, soil health and climate change. Springer, Berlin, pp 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20256-8_4
Rousk J, Bååth E, Brookes PC, Lauber CL, Lozupone C, Caporaso JG, Knight R, Fierer N (2010) Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil. ISME J 4:1340–1351. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2010.58
Stegen JC, Lin XJ, Konopka AE, Fredrickson JK (2012) Stochastic and deterministic assembly processes in subsurface microbial communities. ISME J 6:1653–1664. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.22
Steinauer K, Chatzinotas A, Eisenhauer N (2016) Root exudate cocktails: the link between plant diversity and soil microorganisms? Ecol Evol 6:7387–7396. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2454
Su FL, Xu S, Sayer EJ, Chen WB, Du Y, Lu XK (2021) Distinct storage mechanisms of soil organic carbon in coniferous forest and evergreen broadleaf forest in tropical China. J Environ Manag 295:113142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113142
Tedersoo L, Bahram M, Põlme S, Kõljalg U, Yorou NS, Wijesundera R, Ruiz LV, Vasco-Palacios AM, Thu PQ, Suija A (2014) Global diversity and geography of soil fungi. Science 346:1256688. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1256688
Tian J, He NP, Hale L, Niu SL, Yu GR, Liu Y, Blagodatskaya E, Kuzyakov Y, Gao Q, Zhou JZ (2018) Soil organic matter availability and climate drive latitudinal patterns in bacterial diversity from tropical to cold temperate forests. Funct Ecol 32:61–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12952
Viechtbauer W (2010) Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw 36(3):1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
Wardle D (1992) A comparative assessment of factors which influence microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen levels in soil. Biol Rev 67:321–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1992.tb00728.x
Wu XC, Jiang XF, Liu HY, Allen C, Li XY, Wang P, Li ZS, Yang YT, Zhang SL, Shi FZ (2022) CPSDv0: a forest stand structure database for plantation forests in China. Big Earth Data. https://doi.org/10.11922/sciencedb.j00076.00091
Xu MP, Gao DX, Fu SY, Lu XQ, Wu SJ, Han XH, Yang GH, Feng YZ (2020) Long-term effects of vegetation and soil on the microbial communities following afforestation of farmland with Robinia pseudoacacia plantations. Geoderma 367:114263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114263
Zhalnina K, Dias R, de Quadros PD, Davis-Richardson A, Camargo FA, Clark IM, McGrath SP, Hirsch PR, Triplett EW (2015) Soil pH determines microbial diversity and composition in the park grass experiment. Microb Ecol 69:395–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-014-0530-2
Zhang XY, Li WJ, Zhong ZK, Zhang QY, Wang X, Han XH, Ren CJ, Yang GH (2020) Response of soil microbial community to C:N:P stoichiometry along a Caragana korshinskii restoration gradient on the loess plateau, China. Forests 11:823. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11080823
Zhao FZ, Fan XD, Ren CJ, Zhang L, Han XH, Yang GH, Wang J, Doughty R (2018) Changes of the organic carbon content and stability of soil aggregates affected by soil bacterial community after afforestation. CATENA 171:622–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.08.006
Zhou JZ, Ning DL (2017) Stochastic community assembly: does it matter in microbial ecology? Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 81(4):e00002-00017. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00002-17
Zhou J, Liu W, Deng Y, Jiang YH, Xue K, He Z, Van Nostrand JD, Liyou W, Yang Y, Wang A (2013) Stochastic assembly leads to alternative communities with distinct functions in a bioreactor microbial community. mBio J 4(2):e00584-12. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00584-12
Zhou ZH, Wang CK, Luo YQ (2020) Meta-analysis of the impacts of global change factors on soil microbial diversity and functionality. Nat Commun 11:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16881-7
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Project funding
This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFD2200401) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31901293).
The online version is available at http://www.springerlink.com.
Corresponding editor: Tao Xu.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Pang, X., Wang, C., Ren, C. et al. Afforestation increases microbial diversity in low-carbon soils. J. For. Res. 35, 3 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-023-01654-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-023-01654-x