Abstract
There has been contentious debate over the years about whether there are morally relevant similarities and differences between the three practices of continuous deep sedation until death, physician-assisted suicide, and voluntary euthanasia. Surprisingly little academic attention has been paid to a comparison of the uses of these practices in the two types of circumstances in which they are typically performed. A comparative domains of ethics analysis methodological approach is used in the paper to compare 1) the use of the three practices in paradigm circumstances, and 2) the use of the practices in paradigm circumstances to their use in non-paradigm circumstances. The analytical outcomes suggest that a bright moral line cannot be demonstrated between any two of the practices in paradigm circumstances, and that there are significant, morally-relevant distinctions between their use in paradigm and non-paradigm circumstances. A thought experiment is employed to illustrate how these outcomes could possibly inform the decisions of hypothetical deliberators who are engaged in the collaborative development of assisted dying regulatory frameworks.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Battin, M.P. 2008. Terminal sedation: Pulling the sheet over our eyes. Hastings Center Report 38(5): 27–30.
Battin, M.P., A. van der Heide, L. Ganzini, G. van der Wal, and B.D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen. 2007. Legal physician-assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: Evidence concerning the impact on patients in “vulnerable” groups. Journal of Medical Ethics 33(10): 591–597.
Chambaere, K., J. Bilsen, J. Cohen, B.D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, F. Mortier, and L. Deliens. 2010. Physician-assisted deaths under the euthanasia law in Belgium: A population-based survey. Canadian Medical Association Journal 182(9): 895–901.
de Graeff, A., and M. Dean. 2007. Palliative sedation therapy in the last weeks of life: A literature review and recommendations for standards. Journal of Palliative Medicine 10(1): 67–85.
Dean, M.M., V. Cellarius, B. Henry, D. Oneschuk, and L. Librach. 2012. Framework for continuous palliative sedation therapy in Canada. Journal of Palliative Medicine 5(8): 870–876.
Dees, M.K, M.J. Vernooij-Dasse, W.J. Dekkers, K. Vissers, and C. van Weel. 2011. “Unbearable suffering”: A qualitative study on the perspectives of patients who request assistance in dying. Journal of Medical Ethics 37(12): 727–734.
Douglas, C., I. Kerridge, and R. Ankeny. 2008. Managing intentions: The end-of-life administration of analgesics and sedatives, and the possibility of slow euthanasia. Bioethics 22(7): 388–396.
Ganzini, L., E.R. Goy, and S.K. Dobscha. 2007. Why Oregon patients request assisted death: Family members’ views. Journal of General Internal Medicine 23(2): 154–157.
Hoflinger, L. 2015. The last days of Annie Bus: A chronicle of Dutch euthanasia. Spiegel Online, August 29. http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel-tracks-a-dutch-euthanasia-patient-in-her-final-days-of-life-a-1016675.html.
Jansen, L.A., and D.P. Sulmasy. 2002. Proportionality, terminal suffering and the restorative goals of medicine. Theoretical Medicine 23(4–5): 321–337.
Kim, S.Y.H., R.G. De Vries, and J.R. Peteet. 2016. Euthanasia and assisted suicide of patients with psychiatric disorders in the Netherlands 2011 to 2014. JAMA Psychiatry 73(4): 362–368.
Kingsbury, R.J., and H.M. Ducharme. 2002. Two perspectives on total/terminal/palliative sedation. Available at http://CBHD.org/.
Kirby, J. 2010. Accessing the ethics of complex health care practices: Would a “domains of ethics analysis” approach help? HEC Forum 22: 133–143.
———. 2015a. Managing profound suffering at the end-of-life: Should expanded access to continuous deep sedation be the priority? BioéthiqueOnline 4/2. http://bioethiqueonline.ca/docs/4/2.pdf .
———. 2015b. Murderer-rapist almost euthanized in Belgium: Is the public outcry warranted? Journal of Ethics in Mental Health. http://www.jemh.ca/issues/open/documents/JEMH_Open-Volume_Insight_Murderer-Rapist_Almost_Euthanized_in_Belgium.pdf.
Lo, B., and G. Rubenfeld. 2005. Palliative sedation in dying patients: We turn to it when everything else hasn’t worked. Journal of the American Medical Association 294(14): 1810–1816.
Pojman, L.P., editor. 1998. Ethical theory: Classical and contemporary readings, 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Quill, T.E., R. Dresser, and D.W. Brock. 1997. The rule of double effect–A critique of its role in end-of life decision making. The New England Journal of Medicine 337(24): 1768–1771.
Quill, T.E. 1993. The ambiguity of clinical intentions. New England Journal of Medicine z1039–z1040.
Raus, K., L. Anquinet, J. Rietjens, L. Deliens, F. Mortier, and S. Sterckz. 2014. Factors that facilitate or constrain the use of continuous sedation at the end of life by physicians and nurses in Belgium: Results from a focus group study. Journal of Medical Ethics 40(4): 230–234.
Raus, K, S. Sterckx, and F. Mortier. 2012. Continuous deep sedation at the end of life and the “natural death” hypothesis. Bioethics 26(6): 329–336.
Rietjens, J.A.C., P.J. van der Maas, B.D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, J.J.M. van Delden, and A. van der Heide. 2009. Two decades of research on euthanasia from the Netherlands: What have we learnt and what questions remain? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6(3): 271–283.
Rys, S., R. Deschepper, F. Mortier, L. Deliens, D. Atkinson, and J Bilsen, 2012. The moral difference or equivalence between continuous sedation until death and physician-assisted death: Word games or war games. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9(2): 171–183.
Swart, S.J., A. van der Heide, L. van Zulen, R.S.G.M. Perez, W.W.A. Zuurmond, P.J van der Maas, et al. 2014. Continuous palliative sedation: Not only a response to physical suffering. Journal of Palliative Medicine 17(1): 27–36.
van Delden, J.J.M. 2013. The ethical evaluation of continuous sedation at the end of life. In Continuous Sedation at the End of Life – Clinical, Legal and Ethical Perspectives. Edited by S. Sterckx, K. Raus, and F. Mortier. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 218–227.
Vayne-Bossert, P., and G.B. Zulian. 2013. Palliative sedation: From the family perspective. American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care 30(8): 786–790.
Verkerk, M., H. Lindemann, E. Maeckelberghe, E. Feenstra, R. Hartoungh, and M. De Bree. 2004. Enhancing reflection: An interpersonal exercise in ethics education. Hastings Center Report 34(6): 31–38.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kirby, J. Morally-Relevant Similarities and Differences Between Assisted Dying Practices in Paradigm and Non-Paradigm Circumstances: Could They Inform Regulatory Decisions? . Bioethical Inquiry 14, 475–483 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-017-9808-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-017-9808-7