Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An evaluation on using soil aggregate stability as the indicator of interrill erodibility

  • Published:
Journal of Mountain Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aggregate stability is a very important predictor of soil structure and strength, which influences soil erodibility. Several aggregate stability indices were selected for estimating interrill erodibility of four soil types with contrasting properties from temperate and subtropical regions of China. This study was conducted to investigate how closely the soil interrill erodibility factor in the Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) model relates to soil aggregate stability. The mass fractal dimension (FD), geometric mean diameter (GMD), mean weight diameter (MWD), and aggregate stability index (ASI) of soil aggregates were calculated. A rainfall simulator with a drainable flume (3.0 m long × 1.0 m wide × 0.5 m deep) was used at four slope gradients (5°, 10°,15° and 20°), and four rainfall intensities (0.6, 1.1, 1.7 and 2.5 mm/min). Results indicated that the interrill erodibility (Ki) values were significantly correlated to the indices of ASI, MWD, GMD, and FD computed from the aggregate wet-sieve data. The K i had a strong positive correlation with FD, as well as a strong negative correlation with ASI, GMD, and MWD. Soils with a higher aggregate stability and lower fractal dimension have smaller K i values. Stable soils were characterized by a high percentage of large aggregates and the erodible soils by a high percentage of smaller aggregates. The correlation coefficients of K i with ASI and GMD were greater than those with FD and MWD, implying that both the ASI and GMD may be better alternative parameters for empirically predicting the soil K i factor. ASI and GMD are more reasonable in interrill soil erodibility estimation, compared with K i calculation in original WEPP model equation. Results demonstrate the validation of soil aggregation characterization as an appropriate indicator of soil susceptibility to erosion in contrasting soil types in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelaide M (2007) Assessing nutrient losses with soil erosion under different tillage systems and their implications on water quality. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 32: 1135–1140. DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2007.07.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adornis D, Nciizah Isaiah IC, Wakindiki IC (2014) Physical indicators of soil erosion, aggregate stability and erodibility. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 61(6): 1–16. DOI: 10.1080/03650340.2014.956660

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi A, Neyshabouri, MR, Rouhipour H, et al. (2011) Fractal dimension of soil aggregates as an index of soil erodibility. Journal of Hydrology 400(3-4): 305–311. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.01.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amézketa E (1999) Soil aggregate stability: a review. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 14(2-3): 83–151. DOI: 10.1300/J06 4v14n02_08

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asadi H, Rouhipour H, Ghadiri H (2008) Evaluation of interrill component of WEPP model for three contrasting soil types. Advance Geoecology 39: 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajracharya RM, Lal R (1992) Seasonal soil loss and erodibility variation on a Miamian silt loam soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 56: 1560–1565. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1992.036 15995005600050037x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthes B, Azontonde A, BoliBZ, et al. (2000) Field-scale aggregate stability in three tropical regions (Benin, Cameroon, Mexico). European Journal of Soil Science 51: 485–495. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2000.00322.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthes B, Roose E (2002) Aggregate stability as an indicator of soil susceptibility to runoff and erosion; validation at several levels. Catena 47: 133–149. DOI: 10.1016/S0341-8162(01)00180-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoli F, Burtin G, Guerif J (1992) Influence of organic carbon on aggregation in Oxisols rich in gibbsite or in goethite: II. Clay dispersion, aggregate strength and water stability. Geoderma 54(1-4): 259–274. DOI: 10.1016/0016-7061(92)90108-J

    Google Scholar 

  • Bissonnals YLE (1996) Aggregate stability and assessment of soil crustability and erodibility: theory and methodology. European Journal of Soil Science 47: 425–437. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01843.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan RB (1969) The development, use and efficiency of indices of soil erodibility. Geoderma 2(1): 5–26. DOI: 10.1016/0016-7061(68)90002-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan RB (2000) Soil erodibility and processes of water erosion on hillslope. Geomorphology 32(3-4): 385–415. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00105-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canton Y, Sole-Benet A, Asensil C, et al. (2009) Aggregate stability in range sandy loam soils: relationships with runoff and erosion. Catena 77(3): 192–199. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2008.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerda A (2000) Aggregate stability against water forces under different climates on agriculture land and scrubland in southern Bolivia. Soil & Tillage Research 57(3):159–166. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-1987(00)00155-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charman PEV Ed. (1978) Soils of New South Wales: Their Characterization, Classification and Conservation, Tech. Handbook No. 1, Soil Conservation Service of NSW, Sydney, Austalia.

  • De PJ, Poesen J (ed.) (1985) Aggregate stability, runoff generation and interrill erosion. In: Geomorphology and Soils, Richards KS. Allen and Unwin, London, Britain.

  • Delgado JA, Shaffer M, Hu C, et al. (2008) An index approach to assess nitrogen losses to the environment. Ecological Engineering 32(2): 108–120. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egashira K, Kaetsu Y, Takuma K (1983) Aggregate stability as an index of erodibility of Ando soils. Soil Science and Plant Nutriation 29(4): 473–481. DOI: 10.1080/00380768.1983.10434650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan DC, Nearing MA (1995) USDA-Water erosion prediction project: Hillslope profile and watershed model documentation. NSERL Report No. 10. (USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory: West Lafayette).

  • Fox DM, Le Bissonnais Y (1998) Process-based analysis of aggregate stability effects on sealing, infiltration, and interrill erosion. Soil Science Society of America Journal 62(3): 717–724. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1998.03615995006200030025x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert JK, Clausen JC (2006) Stormwater runoff quality and quantity from asphalt, paver, and crushed stone driveways in Connecticut. Water Resource Research 40(4): 825–832. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.12.006

    Google Scholar 

  • Guber AK, Pachepsky YA, Levkovsky EV (2005) Fractal masssize scaling of wetting soil aggregates. Ecological Modelling 182 (3-4): 317–322. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.04.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo W, Shi ZH, Chen LD, et al. (2007) Red soil surface soil aggregate particle size effects on slope surface erosion process. ActaEcologicaSinica 27(6): 2516–2522. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • ISSAS (1978) Soil Physical and Chemical Analysis. Shanghai Science and Technology Press, Shanghai, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerzy N, Barbara WW (2003) Index of soil aggregates stability as linear function value of transition matrix elements. Soil & Tillage Research 70(2): 121–130. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-198702)00155-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnell PIA (1993) Runoff as a factor influencing experimentally determined interrillerodibilities. Australia Journal of Soil Research 31(3): 333–342. DOI: 10.1071/SR9930333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Bissonnais Y (1996) Aggregate stability and assessment of soil crustability and erodibility: I Theory and methodology. European Journal of Soil Science 47(4): 425–437. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01843.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Bissonnais Y, Benkhadra H, Chaplot V, et al. (1998) Crusting, runoff and sheet erosion on silty loamy soils at various scales and up scaling from m2 to small catchments. Soil and Tillage Research 46(1-2): 69–80. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-1987(98)80109-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legout C, Leguedois S, Le Bissonnais Y (2005) Aggregate breakdown dynamics under rainfall compared with aggregate stability measurements. European Journal of Soil Science 56(2):225–237. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2004.00663.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu G (1997) Study on soil anti-scourability and related issues in the Loess Plateau. Research of Soil and Water Conservation 4(5): 122–128. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu GB, Xu MX, Ritsema C (2003) A study of soil surface characteristics in a small watershed in the hilly, gullied area on the Chinese Loess Plateau. Catena 54(1-2): 31–44. DOI: 10.1016/S0341-8162(03)00055-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobe I, Amenlung W, Du Preez CC (2001) Losses of carbon and nitrogen with prolonged arable cropping from sandy soils of the South African Highveld. European Journal of Soil Science 52(1): 93–101. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2001.t01-1-00362.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinerz-Mena M, Deeks LK, Williams AG (1999) An evaluation of a fragmentation fractal dimension technique to determine soil erodibility. Geoderma 90 (1-2): 87–98. DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7061(98)00097-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazurak AP (1950) Effect of gaseous phase on water-stable synthetic aggregates. Soil Science 69(2): 135–148. DOI:10.1097/00010694-195002000-00005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misra RK, Teixeira PC (2001) The sensitivity of erosion and erodibility of forest soils to structure and strength. Soil & Tillage Research 59(1-2): 81–93. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00155-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ning LD, Shi H, Zhou HJ (2005) Quantitative characteristics of soil aggregates under different vegetation in upper reach of Minjiang River. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 16(8): 1405–1410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pansak W, Hilger TH, Dercon G (2008) Changes in the relationship between soil erosion and N loss pathways after establishing soil conservation systems in uplands of Northeast Thailand. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 128(3): 167–176. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2008.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfect E, Diaz-Zorita M, Grove JH. (2002) A prefractal model for predicting soil fragment mass-size distributions. Soil & Tillage Research 64(1-2): 79–90. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-1987(01) 00246-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfect E, Kay BD (1991) Fractal theory applied to soil aggregation. Soil Science Society of American Journal 55(6): 1552–1558. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500060009x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirmoradian N, Sepaskhah AR, Hajabbasi MA (2005) Application of fractal theory to quantify soil aggregate stability as influenced by tillage treatments. Biosystems Engineering 90(2): 227–234. DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng. 2004.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puri AN, Puri BR (1939) Physical characteristics of soils: II. Expressing mechanical analysis and state of aggregation of soils by single values. Soil Science 47(1): 77–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasiah V, Kay BD, Perfect E (1993) New mass-based model for estimating fractal dimension of soil aggregates. Soil Science Society of American Journal 57 (4):891–895. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700040002x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasiah V, Perfect E, Kay BD (1995) Linear and nonlinear estimates of fractal dimension for soil aggregate fragmentation. Soil Science Society of American Journal 59(1): 83–87. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1995.03615995005900010012x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichert JM, Norton LD (2013) Rill and interrillerodibility and sediment characteristics of clayey Australian Vertosols and a Ferrosol. Soil Research 51: 1–9. DOI: 10.1071/SR12243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichert JM, Norton LD, Favaretto N, et al. (2009) Settling velocity, aggregate stability, and interrillerodibility of soils varying in clay mineralogy. Soil Science Society of America Journal 73: 1369–1377. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2007.0067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichert JM, Norton LD, Huang CH (1994) Sealing, amendment, and rain intensity effects on erosion of high-clay soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 58: 1199–1205. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800040028x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, et al. (1997) Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE). Agriculture Handbook No. 703. USDA, Washington DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi ZH, Yan FL, Li L, et al. (2010) Interrill erosion from disturbed and undisturbed samples in relation to topsoil aggregates stability in red soils from subtropical China. Catena 81(3):240–248. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2010.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skidmore EL, Layton JB (1992) Dry-soil aggregation stability as influenced by selected soil properties. Soil Science Society of American Journal 56(2): 557–561. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1992. 03615995005600020034x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su YZ, Zhao HL, Zhao WZ, et al. (2004) Fractal features of soil particle size distribution and the implication for indicating desertification. Geoderma 122(1): 43–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.geo derma.2003.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang KL Ed. (2004) Soil and Water Conservation in China. Science Press, Beijing, China.

  • Tyler SW, Wheatcraft SW (1992) Fractal scaling of soil particle size distributions: analysis and limitations. Soil Science Society of American Journal 56(2): 362–369. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600020005x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaezi AR, Sadeghi SHR, Bahrami HA, et al. (2007) Modeling the USLE K-factor for calcareous soils in northwestern Iran. Geomorphology 97(3-4): 414–423. DOI:10.1016/j.geomorph. 2007.08.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valmis S, Dimoyiannis D, Danalatos NG (2005) Assessing interrill erosion rate from soil aggregate instability index, rainfall intensity and slope angle on cultivated soils in central Greece. Soil & Tillage Research 80 (1-2): 139–147. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2004.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veihe A (2002) The spatial variability of erodibility and its relation to soil types: a study from northern Ghana. Geoderma 106(1-2): 101–120. DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7061(01)00120-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhaegen T (1984) The influence of soil properties on the erodibility of Belgian loamy soils: a study based on rainfall simulation experiments. Earth Surface and Process Landforms 9(6): 499–507. DOI: 10.1002/esp.3290090603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Zheng FL, Romkens MJM, et al. (2013) Soil erodibilityfor water erosion: a perspective and Chinese experiences. Geomorphology 187(1): 1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.01.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zehetner F, Miller WP (2006) Erodibility and runoff-infiltration characteristics of volcanic ash soils along an altitudinal climosequence in the Ecuadorian Andes. Catena 65(3):201–213. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2005.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang GS, Chan KY, Oates A, et al. (2007) Relationship between soil structure and runoff/soil loss after 24 years of conservation tillage. Soil & Tillage Research 92(1-2): 122–128. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2006.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang KL, Shu AP, Xu XL, et al. (2008) Soil erodibility and its estimation for agricultural soils in China. Journal of Arid Environments 72(6): 1002–1011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2007.11.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng FL, Yang QK, Wang ZL (2004) Water erosion prediction model. Research of Soil and Water Conservation 11(4): 13–24. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Soil and Water Conservation Department of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan, 430010, China

    Wen-feng Ding

  2. USDA-ARS, Grazinglands Research Lab., 7207 W. Cheyenne St., El Reno, OK, 73036, USA

    Xun-chang Zhang

Authors
  1. Wen-feng Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xun-chang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-feng Ding.

Additional information

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6011-7495

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8438-0802

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ding, Wf., Zhang, Xc. An evaluation on using soil aggregate stability as the indicator of interrill erodibility. J. Mt. Sci. 13, 831–843 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-015-3447-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-015-3447-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation