Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Driving factors and impact of land-use change in a fragile rainfed lowland rice-sugar palm cultural agroforestry system in southern Thailand

  • Special Feature: Original Article
  • Agroforestry for Sustainable Landscape Management
  • Published:
Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The multi-functional agroforestry system associating rainfed lowland rice and sugar palm (RLR-SP) hedges has been sustaining emblematic cultural landscapes in the Indianized countries of Southeast Asia for centuries. Often established in areas facing very constrained soil–water conditions, it played a crucial role in the agro-ecological, social and economic resilience of these agrarian systems. Recent changes in communication infrastructure, commercialization, urbanization, state interventions and private initiatives have driven the transformations of these iconic cultural landscapes, but analyses of their socio-ecological impacts on household livelihoods and landscapes features are lacking. In this study, we quantified and analysed the transformations of a coastal RLR-SP cultural landscape in Southeast Thailand. We used remote sensing data to characterize and quantify land-use change during 1983–2015, and interviews with diverse stakeholders to understand the impacts of the driving factors of change on livelihood systems. After the mid-1980s, market integration facilitated by the construction of bridges and all-weather roads led to the diversification of farming and off-farm activities, increasing the mobility of farm labourers sizing wage-earning opportunities in neighbouring urban centres. In the 1990s, the RLR-SP system faced the introduction of an irrigation canal, shrimp farming, tree plantations, and the partial conversion of deep-water rice areas into mixed gardens. More recently, the demand for sugar palm fruits by the caning industry has revived an interest in sugar palm groves. A policy to raise the farm incomes associated with palm oil companies supported the conversion of paddy fields into small oil palm plantations, which is the most important recent land-use change and future threat to the survival of the RLR-SP system. Like in other Southeast Asian coastal areas, the increased frequency of extreme climatic events is another major threat faced by this emblematic but increasingly vulnerable cultural agroecosystem. The profitable and land/water resource efficient association of the RLR-SP system with commercial vegetable production on diversified smallholdings is a promising way towards a more sustainable landscape management that could be supported by improving on-farm water storage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

(Source: Potential Evapotranspiration (PET) data (Penman formula) for Songkhla station from Vongvisessomjai (1999))

Fig. 3

(Source: Land Development Department, Thailand)

Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

(Source: aerial photos (1983), digital orthophoto, Google Earth Pro (1991–1999), Google Earth Pro (2018))

Fig. 7

(Source: National Statistical Office, Thailand)

Fig. 8

(Source: Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council, Thailand)

Fig. 9

(Source: National Statistical Office, Thailand)

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antrop M (2005) Why landscapes of the past are important for the future? Landscape Urban Plan 70:21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell KB, Irwin EG (2002) Spatially explicit micro-level modelling of land use change at the rural-urban interface. Agr Econ 27:217–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2002.tb00118.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coedès G (1964) Les Etats hindouisés d’Indochine et d’Indonésie (3rd ed). Editions E De Boccard, Paris

  • Congalton RG, Green K (1999) Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. Lewis Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Deffontaines JP, Thenail C, Baudry J (1995) Agricultural systems and landscape patterns: how can we build a relationship? Landscape Urban Plan 31:3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(94)01031-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dey A, Islam M, Masum KM (2014) Above ground carbon stock through palm tree in the homegarden of Sylhet City in Bangladesh. J Forest Environ Sci 30:293–300. https://doi.org/10.7747/JFS.2014.30.3.293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumrongrojwatthana P (2017) Participatory modelling to improve understanding of land use change and adaptive management capacity: case study of Sathing Phra district, Songkhla province. Final report (Thailand Research Fund: TRG5880219)

  • Dumrongrojwatthana P, Lacombe G, Trébuil G (unpublished data) The increased frequency of extreme rainy events threatens an emblematic but vulnerable Songkhla lagoon agroecosystem in Southeastern Thailand

  • Ehrensperger A, de Bremond A, Providoli I, Messerli P (2019) Land system science and the 2030 agenda: exploring knowledge that supports sustainability transformation. Curr Opin Env Sust 38:68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.04.0061877-3435/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1983) The palmyrah palm: potential and perspectives. Plant production and protection paper

  • Fotheringham S, Rogerson AP (2009) The SAGE hand book of spatial analysis. SAGE, California

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grandstaff TB, Grandstaff S, Limpinuntana V, Suphanchaimart N (2008) Rainfed revolution in northeast Thailand. Southeast Asian Stud 46:289–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover JD, Leisz SJ, Laituri ME (2017) Comparing and combining Landsat satellite imagery and participatory data to assess land-use and land-cover changes in a coastal village in Papua New Guinea. Hum Ecol 45:251–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-016-9878-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IRRI (2000) Characterizing and understanding rainfed environments. In: Tuong TP, Kam SP, Wade L, Pandey S, Bouman BAM, Hardy B (eds) International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos

  • Kohler F, Marchand G, Negrao M (2015) Local history and landscape dynamics: a comparative study in rural Brazil and rural France. Land Use Policy 43:149–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin EF, Geist HJ, Lepers E (2003) Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions. Annu Rev Env Resour 28:205–241. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin EF, Meyfroidt P (2010) Land-use transitions: socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change. Land Use Policy 27:108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin EF, Meyfroidt P (2011) Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. P Natl Acad Sci USA 108:3465–3472. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100480108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin EF, Turner BL, Geist HJ et al (2001) The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global Environ Chang 11:261–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00007-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langerwisch F, Vaclavik T, von Bloh W, Vetter T, Thonicke K (2018) Combined effects of climate and land-use change on the provision of ecosystem services in rice-agroecosystems. Environ Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa954d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubeigt G (1979) Le palmier à sucre (Borassus flabellifer) en Birmanie centrale. Paris-Sorbonne University, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubeigt G (1982) Une civilisation du palmier à sucre en Asie. Le Courrier du CNRS, pp 24–35

  • Magliocca NR, Rudel TK, Verburg PH, McConnell WJ, Mertz O, Gerstner K, Heinimann A, Ellis EC (2014) Synthesis in land change science: methodological patterns, challenges, and guidelines. Reg Environ Change 15:211–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0626-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews R, Selman P (2006) Landscape as a focus for integrating human and environmental processes. J Agr Econ 52:199–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2006.00047.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazoyer M, Roudart L (2006) A history of world agriculture: from the Neolithic age to the current crisis. Earthscan Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis MD, Ostrom E (2014) Social-ecological system framework: initial changes and continuing challenges. Ecol Soc 19:30. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06387-190230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyfroidt P, Chowdhury RR, de Bremond A, Ellis EC, Erb KH, Filatova T, Garrett RD, Grove JM, Heinimann A, Kuemmerle T, Kull CA, Lambin EF, Landon Y, de le Polain YW, Messerli P, Müller D, Nielsen JØ, Peterson GD, Rodriguez VG, Schlüter M, Turner BL, Verburg PH (2018) Middle-range theories of land system change. Global Environ Chang 53:52–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore JD, Donaldson JA (2016) Human-scale economics: economic growth and poverty reduction in Northeastern Thailand. World Dev 85:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2007) The implications of complexity for integrated resources management. Environ Modell Softw 22:561–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.12.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patamadit I (1999) Le savoir traditionnel en riziculture dans les manuscrits de sagesse populaire à Sathing Phra, Sud-Thaïlande. Aséanie 4:93–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patru-Stupariu I, Tudor CA, Stupariu MS, Buttler A, Peringer A (2016) Landscape persistence and stakeholder perspectives: the case of Romania’s Carpathians. Appl Geogr 69:87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.07.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pingali PL, Rosegrant MW (1995) Agricultural commercialization and diversification: processes and policies. Food Policy 20:171–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-9192(95)00012-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto-Correia T, Kristensen L (2013) Linking research to practice: the landscape as a basis for integrating social and ecological perspectives of the rural. Landsc Urban Plan 120:248–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plieninger T, Bieling C (2012) Resilience and the cultural landscape: understanding and managing change in human-shaped environments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Queiroz C, Beilin R, Folke C, Lindborg R (2014) Farmland abandonment: threat oropportunity for biodiversity conservation? A global review. Front Ecol Environ 12:288–296. https://doi.org/10.1890/120348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramankutty N, Coomes OT (2016) Land-use regime shifts: an analytical framework and agenda for future land-use research. Ecol Soc 21:1. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08370-210201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rambo T (2017) The agrarian transformation in northeastern Thailand: a review of recent research. Southeast Asian Stud 6:211–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon T, Timmer CP (2014) Five inter-linked transformations in the Asian agrifood economy: food security implications. Glob Food Secur 3:108–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2014.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed J, van Vianen J, Barlow J, Sunderland T (2017) Have integrated landscape approaches reconciled societal and environmental issues in the tropics? Land Use Policy 63:481–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigg J, Salamanca A, Parnwell M (2012) Joining the dots of agrarian change in Asia: a 25 year view from Thailand. World Dev 40:1469–1481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigg J, Salamanca A, Phongsiri M, Sripun M (2018) More farmers, less farming? Understanding the truncated agrarian transition in Thailand. World Dev 107:327–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigg J, Vandergeest P (2012) Revisiting rural places: pathways to poverty and prosperity in Southeast Asia. NUS Press, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Romera JP (1968) Le Borassus et le sucre de palme au Cambodge. Agron Trop 23:801–843

    Google Scholar 

  • Sangkaphan J, Churngchow C, Laeheem K (2018) Community empowerment based on local wisdom: a case study of the Nodenalay Learning Center in Sathingphra District, Songkhla Province. J Thai Khadi Res Instit 15:249–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer J, Sunderland T, Ghazoul J, Pfund J-L, Sheil D, Meijaard E et al (2013) Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. P Natl Acad Sci USA 110:8349–8356. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1210595110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh VP, Singh RK (eds) (2000) Rainfed rice: a sourcebook of best practices and strategies in eastern India. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines, p 292

    Google Scholar 

  • Syahrinudin S (2005) The potential of oil palm and forest plantations for carbon sequestration on degraded land in Indonesia. Cuvillier Verlag, Gottingen, p 108

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichit L (1982) L'agriculture au Cambodge: 5.1: Le palmier à sucre. Agence de coopération culturelle et technique, Paris, pp157–166

  • Trébuil G (1987) Principles and steps of the method of diagnosis on agrarian systems: a case study from Sathing Phra area, Southern Thailand. Farming systems research and development in Thailand. Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, pp 29–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Trébuil G, Thungwa S (2002) Farmers’ direct-sowing practices in rainfed lowland rice in southern Thailand: Improving a traditional system. Pandey S., Mortimer M., Wade L., Tuong T. P., Lopez K., Hardy B. (eds). Direct Seeding: Research issues and opportunities. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines. pp99–114.

  • Trébuil G, Thungwa S, Patamadit- Trébuil I (1983) The present system and recent changes in land use in Sathing Phra district, southern Thailand. Research on farming systems project, Faculty of Natural resources, Prince of Songkla University, Working Paper 2

  • Tsuchiya K, Hara Y, Thaitakoo D (2015) Linking food and land systems for sustainable peri-urban agriculture in Bangkok Metropolitan Region. Landsc Urban Plan 143:192–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandergeest P (2012) Deagrarianization and re-agrarianisation: multiple pathways of change on the Sathing Phra peninsula. Revisiting rural places: Pathways to poverty and prosperity in Southeast Asia. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, pp135–156

  • Vella WF (ed) and Cowing SB (translator) (1968) George Coedès: the Indianized States of Southeast Asia. East-West Center, University of Hawai, Honolulu

  • Vongvisessomjai S (1999) EIA of salinity barrier construction at Songkhla lagoon. Songklanakarin J Sci Technol 21(4):196–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanich K (2016) Land use management approach by integrating geoinformatics and participatory process in sathingphra district, songkhla province, Thailand. Master Thesis, Chulalongkorn University

  • Wu J (2019) Linking landscape, land system and design approaches to achieve sustainability. J Land Use Sci 14(2):173–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2019.1602677

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young OR, Lambin EF, Alcock F, Haberl H, Karlsson SI, McConnell W, Myint T, Pahl-Wostl C, Polsky C, Ramakrishnan PS, Schroeder H, Scouvart M, Verburg PH (2006) A protfolio approach to analyzing complex human-environment interactions: institutions and land change. Ecol Soc 11:31. https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art31/

  • Zaehringer JG, Lundsgaard-Hansen L, Thein TT, Llopis JC, Tun NN, Myint W, Schneider F (2020) The cash crop boom in southern Myanmar: tracing land use regime shifts through participatory mapping. Ecosyst People 16(1):36–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2019.1699164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zasada I (2011) Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture: a review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming. Land Use Policy 28:639–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.01.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the guest editor of this special issue as well as three anonymous reviewers for their pertinent suggestions and constructive comments on the manuscript. The authors acknowledge the help of Prof. Dr. Somyot Thungwa and Dr. Kobchai Worrapimphong during the early phase of this research. We are grateful to all farmers and administrative staff members from Tha Hin and Bo Daeng for their time and ideas, and members of the Tropical Ecology and Natural Resource Management Research Laboratory for their assistance in the field. This research was financially supported by the Thailand Research Fund (TRG5880219) and the 90th Anniversary of Chulalongkorn University Fund (Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand

    Pongchai Dumrongrojwatthana

  2. Environmental Sciences Programme, Graduate School, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand

    Keerati Wanich

  3. CIRAD, Umr Innovation, 34398, Montpellier, France

    Guy Trébuil

  4. Innovation, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France

    Guy Trébuil

Authors
  1. Pongchai Dumrongrojwatthana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Keerati Wanich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guy Trébuil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pongchai Dumrongrojwatthana.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Handled by Tobias Plieninger, Georg-August-Universitat Gottingen, Germany.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dumrongrojwatthana, P., Wanich, K. & Trébuil, G. Driving factors and impact of land-use change in a fragile rainfed lowland rice-sugar palm cultural agroforestry system in southern Thailand. Sustain Sci 15, 1317–1335 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00819-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00819-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation