Skip to main content
Log in

Overdose Rate of Drugs Requiring Renal Dose Adjustment: Data Analysis of 4 Years Prescriptions at a Tertiary Teaching Hospital

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the overdose rate of drugs that require renal dose adjustment and factors related with overdose.

SUBJECTS

Total of 23,635,210 records of prescriptions and laboratory data of inpatients at a tertiary teaching hospital for the period from January 2002 to December 2005.

METHODS

A clinical data mart was constructed. A knowledge base containing dose adjusting information about 56 drugs was built. One day dose was compared to the reference dose adjusted to the patient’s renal function.

RESULTS

Considering the patient’s renal function, 5.3% of drug doses were excessive. The overdose rate in the patients with moderate to severe renal insufficiency was 28.2%. Only 25% of physicians were responsible for 50.6% of the overdoses. Of 56 drugs studied, 10 drugs, including ranitidine, amoxicillin, and piperacillin/tazobactam, were involved in 85.4% of the overdoses. The physicians with high overdose rate had patients with more impaired renal function (correlation coefficient = 0.192, P < .001). There were negative correlation between clinical experiences of physician and overdose rate (correlation coefficient = −0.221, P < .001) and workload of prescription (correlation coefficient = −0.446, P < .001), when excluding interns from the analyses. There was positive correlation between workload of prescription and overdose rate (correlation coefficient = 0.361, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

A clinical data mart was useful to analyze the vast amount of electronic hospital data. Drug overdose is quite common among inpatients with renal insufficiency. Only a few drugs are responsible for most of drug overdoses. The physicians’ clinical experience, workload of prescriptions, and patients’ renal function are correlated with drug overdose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kohn LT, Corrigan J, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bobb A, Gleason K, Husch M, Feinglass J, Yarnold PR, Noskin GA. The epidemiology of prescribing errors: the potential impact of computerized prescriber order entry. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:785–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lam YW, Banerji S, Hatfield C, Talbert RL. Principles of drug administration in renal insufficiency. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997;32:30–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Talbert RL. Drug dosing in renal insufficiency. J Clin Pharmacol. 1994;34:99–110.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Matzke GR, Frye RF. Drug administration in patients with renal insufficiency. Minimising renal and extrarenal toxicity. Drug Saf. 1997;16:205–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Muhlberg W, Platt D. Age-dependent changes of the kidneys: pharmacological implications. Gerontology. 1999;45:243–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kappel J, Calissi P. Nephrology: 3. Safe drug prescribing for patients with renal insufficiency. CMAJ. 2002;166:473–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chertow GM, Lee J, Kuperman GJ, et al. Guided medication dosing for inpatients with renal insufficiency. JAMA. 2001;286:2839–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Falconnier AD, Haefeli WE, Schoenenberger RA, Surber C, Martin-Facklam M. Drug dosage in patients with renal failure optimized by immediate concurrent feedback. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:369–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Renal Dosing Database. Available at http://www.globalrph.com/index_renal.htm. Accessed May 24, 2007.

  11. Gilbert DN, Moellering RC, Eliopoulos GM, Sande MA. The Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial Therapy, 34th ed. Virginia: Antimicrobial Therapy; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:461–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Garg DC, Baltodano N, Jallad NS, et al. Pharmacokinetics of ranitidine in patients with renal failure. J Clin Pharmacol. 1986;26:286–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Slugg PH, Haug MT 3rd, Pippenger CE. Ranitidine pharmacokinetics and adverse central nervous system reactions. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:2325–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293:1223–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1409–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Glassman PA, Simon B, Belperio P, Lanto A. Improving recognition of drug interactions: benefits and barriers to using automated drug alerts. Med Care. 2002;40:1161–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Galanter WL, Didomenico RJ, Polikaitis A. A trial of automated decision support alerts for contraindicated medications using computerized physician order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12:269–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. van der Sijs H, Aarts J, Vulto A, Berg M. Overriding of drug safety alerts in computerized physician order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13:138–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shah NR, Seger AC, Seger DL, et al. Improving acceptance of computerized prescribing alerts in ambulatory care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13:5–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Soumerai SB, McLaughlin TJ, Avorn J. Improving drug prescribing in primary care: a critical analysis of the experimental literature. Milbank Q. 1989;67:268–317.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA. 1995;274:700–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Hyuck Joon Chung for his assistance in the reference knowledge base review. This study was supported by a grant from the Korea Health 21 R&D project, Ministry of Health &Welfare, Republic of Korea (A050571); by a grant from the Korea Research Foundation, Republic of Korea (KRF-2006-332-E00093); and by a grant from the Department of Medical Sciences, The Graduate School, Ajou University.

Conflicts of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rae Woong Park MD, PhD.

Additional information

First two authors are equally contributed to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sheen, S.S., Choi, J.E., Park, R.W. et al. Overdose Rate of Drugs Requiring Renal Dose Adjustment: Data Analysis of 4 Years Prescriptions at a Tertiary Teaching Hospital. J GEN INTERN MED 23, 423–428 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0336-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0336-8

KEY WORDS

Navigation