Abstract
Background
Retrorectal cysts make up a small but challenging group of pelvic masses, especially if they extend high into the pelvis. We present a case of successful robotic removal of a large retrorectal cyst.
Methods
Video presentation of a robotic excision of a retrorectal mass.
Results
We present a case of robotic removal of a large retrorectal mass extending up to the S3 vertebra.
Discussion
Robotic approach is a very useful tool for successful removal of large pelvic masses that cannot be removed by traditional posterior or trans perineal approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Neale JA. Retrorectal Tumors. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2011 Sep;24(3):149–60. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1285999.
Oguz A, Böyük A, Turkoglu A, Goya C, Alabalık U, Teke F, Budak H, Gumuş M. Retrorectal Tumors in Adults: A 10-Year Retrospective Study. Int Surg. 2015 Jul;100(7–8):1177–84. https://doi.org/10.9738/INTSURG-D-15-00068.1.
Saleh M. Eftaiha, Kunal Kochar, Ajit Pai, John J. Park, Leela M. Prasad, Slawomir J. Marecik Robot-assisted approach to a retrorectal lesion in an obese female. J Vis Surg. 2016; 2: 59. Published online 2016 Mar 21. https://doi.org/10.21037/jovs.2016.02.21
Baek SJ, Kim CH, Cho MS, Bae SU, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, Lee KY, Kim NK. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer can overcome difficulties associated with pelvic anatomy. Surg Endosc. 2015 Jun;29(6):1419–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3818-x.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Jose Cataneo: concept and design; drafting and revising critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring accuracy and integrity of any part of the work.
Thomas Cataldo: concept and design; drafting and revising critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring accuracy and integrity of any part of the work.
Vitaliy Poylin: concept and design; drafting and revising critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring accuracy and integrity of any part of the work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic Supplementary Material
(WMV 196383 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cataneo, J., Cataldo, T. & Poylin, V. Robotic Excision of Retrorectal Mass. J Gastrointest Surg 22, 1811–1813 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-3838-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-3838-2