Skip to main content
Log in

Distal Bowel Re-feeding in Patients with Proximal Jejunostomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

Patients who have a proximal jejunostomy are difficult to manage because of their high stoma output which results in fluid and electrolyte imbalance with repeated hospital admissions and the necessity for expensive parenteral nutrition (PN). There are few reports on the use of re-feeding of the proximal effluents in this situation.

Methods

We here relate our experience with this manoeuvre in 35 patients between Jan 2010 and Feb 2016 who had stomas less than 120 cm away from the duodenojejunal flexure.

Results

There were 26 males and 9 females, whose median age was 47 (19–74) years. The most common indications for massive bowel resection were gangrene in 25 (71%) and intestinal perforation in 7 (20%). The median proximal and distal small bowel lengths were 45 (15–120) cm and 90 (0–240) cm respectively. The ileocaecal (IC) valve was preserved in 33 (94%) and there was only colon distally (without the ileocaecal valve) in 2 (6%) patients. Twenty-five (71%) patients required post-operative ICU care. Additional PN was required in 6 (17%) patients during their index admission with the average extra cost of treatment being 20,000 rupees. Their median hospital stay was 13 (6–60) days. Patients were discharged without intravenous (IV) lines. Eight (26%) patients required re-admission for acute renal failure which was managed conservatively. No major problems were associated with re-feeding. None of the patients required PN after discharge from hospital. Thirty (86%) patients had their stomas closed at 65 (14–224) days. Both the patients with colon only as their distal bowel remnant died. Sepsis was the cause of mortality in 4 (11%) during index admission and 3 after their discharge. On follow-up after bowel re-connection, 2 patients died after 1 and 12 months, both due to intracranial bleeding, and the overall survival was 74%.

Conclusions

Patients with proximal jejunostomies can be managed with distal re-feeding. It is a cost-effective and effective substitute for PN, is associated with few problems, and has a fairly good long-term outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sturm A, Layer P, Goebell H, Dignass AU. Short-bowel syndrome: an update on the therapeutic approach. Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology 1997;32:289–296.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Scolapio JS. Effect of growth hormone and glutamine on the short bowel: five years later. Gut 2000;47:164–165.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Thompson JS. Inflammatory disease and outcome of short bowel syndrome. Am J Surg 2000;180:551–555.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sundaram A, Koutkia P, Apovian CM. Nutritional management of short bowel syndrome in adults. J ClinGastroenterol 2002;3:207–220.

  5. Donohoe CL, Reynolds JV. Short bowel syndrome. Surgeon 2010;5:270–279.

  6. Klein S. Influence of nutrition support on clinical outcome in short bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease. Nutrition 1995;11:233–237

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Carbonnel F, Cosnes J, Chevret S, Beaugerie L, Ngô Y, Malafosse M, Parc R, Le Quintrec Y, Gendre JP. The role of anatomic factors in nutritional autonomy after extensive small bowel resection. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 1996;20:275–280.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Weser E. Nutritional aspects of malabsorption: short gut adaptation. ClinGastroenterol 1983;12:443–461.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hearnshaw SA, Thompson NP. Use of parenteral nutrition in hospitals in the North of England. J Hum Nutr Diet 2007;20:14–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu XM, Ji KQ, Wang HY, Li GF, Zang B, Chen WM. Total enteral nutrition in prevention of pancreatic necrotic infection in severe acute pancreatitis. Pancreas 2010;39:248–251.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Umpierrez GE, Spiegelman R, Zhao V, Smiley DD, Pinzon I, Griffith DP, Peng L, Morris T, Luo M, Garcia H, Thomas C. A double-blind, randomized clinical trial comparing soybean oil–based versus olive oil–based lipid emulsions in adult medical–surgical intensive care unit patients requiring parenteral nutrition. Critical care medicine 2012;40:1792.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cowl CT, Weinstock JV, Al Jurf A, Ephgrave K, Murray JA, Dillon K. Complications and cost associated with parenteral nutrition delivered to hospitalized patients through either subclavian or peripherallyinserted central catheters. ClinNutr 2000;19:237–243.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Grau T, Bonet A, Miñambres E, Piñeiro L, Irles JA, Robles A, Acosta J, Herrero I, Palacios V, Lopez J, Blesa A. The effect of L-alanyl-L-glutamine dipeptide supplemented total parenteral nutrition on infectious morbidity and insulin sensitivity in critically ill patients. Critical care medicine 2011;39:1263–1268.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Braga M, Gianotti L, Gentilini O, Parisi V, Salis C, Di Carlo V. Early postoperative enteral nutrition improves gut oxygenation and reduces costs compared with total parenteral nutrition. Critical care medicine. 2001;29:242–248.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Levy E, Palmer DL, Frileux P, Parc R, Huguet C, Loygue J. Inhibition of upper gastrointestinal secretions by reinfusion of succus entericus into the distal small bowel. A clinical study of 30 patients with peritonitis and temporary enterostomy. Ann Surg 1983;5:596–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu MY, Tang HC, Yang HL, Chang SJ Is jejunostomy output nutrient or waste in short bowel syndrome? Experience from six cases. Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition. 2016;25:430–435.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu Y, Ren J, Wang G, Zhou B, Ding C, Gu G, Chen J, Liu S, Li J. Fistuloclysis improves liver function and nutritional status in patients with high-output upper enteric fistula. Gastroenterology research and practice 2014;2014:941514. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/941514

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Teubner A, Morrison K, Ravishankar HR, Anderson ID, Scott NA, Carlson GL. Fistuloclysis can successfully replace parenteral feeding in the nutritional support of patients with enterocutaneous fistula.Br J Surg 2004;91:625–631.

  19. Nightingale JM, Kamm MA, Van Der Sijp JR, Morris GP, Walker ER, Mather SJ, Britton KE, Lennard-Jones JE. Disturbed gastric emptying in the short bowel syndrome. Evidence for a 9colonic brake9. Gut 1993;34:1171–1176.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. DiBaise JK, Young RJ, Vanderhoof JA. Intestinal rehabilitation and the short bowel syndrome: part 2. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;9:1823–1832.

  21. Andersson H, Bosaeus I, Brummer RJ, Fasth S, Hultén L, Magnusson O, Strauss B. Nutritional and metabolic consequences of extensive bowel resection. Dig Dis 1986;4:193–202.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Niv Y, Charash B, Sperber AD, Oren M. Effect of octreotide on gastrostomy, duodenostomy, and cholecystostomy effluents: A physiological study of fluid and electrolyte balance. Am J Gastroenterol1997;92:2107–2111.

  23. Ukleja A, Romano MM. Complications of parenteral nutrition. GastroenterolClin North Am 2007:36:23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nightingale JM, Kamm MA, van der Sijp JR, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR, Lennard-Jones JE. Gastrointestinal hormones in short bowel syndrome. Peptide YY may be the 'colonic brake' to gastric emptying. Gut 1996;2:267–272.

  25. Picot D, Garin L, Trivin F, Kossovsky MP, Darmaun D, Thibault R. Plasma citrulline is a marker of absorptive small bowel length in patients with transient enterostomy and acute intestinal failure. Clinical Nutrition 2010;29:235–242.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Obertop H, Nundy S, Malamud D, Malt RA. Onset of cell proliferation in the shortened gut. Rapid hyperplasia after jejunal resection. Gastroenterology 1977;72:267–270.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Nygaard K. Resection of the small intestine in rats. 3. Morphological changes in the intestinal tract. ActachirurgicaScandinavica 1967;133:233.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Williamson RC. Intestinal adaptation (first of two parts). Structural, functional and cytokinetic changes. N Engl J Med 1978;298:1393–1402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Williamson RC. Intestinal adaptation (second of two parts). Mechanisms of control. N Engl J Med 1978;298:1444–1450.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tavakkolizadeh A, Whang EE. Understanding and augmenting human intestinal adaptation: a call for more clinical research. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 2002;26:251–255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Alpers DH. How adaptable is the intestine in patients with short-bowel syndrome? Am J ClinNutr 2002;75:787–788.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hanson WR, Osborne JW, Sharp JG. Compensation by the residual intestine after intestinal resection in the rat. I. Influence of amount of tissue removed. Gastroenterology 1977;72:692–700.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mazariegos GV, Steffick DE, Horslen S, Farmer D, Fryer J, Grant D, Langnas A, Magee JC. Intestine transplantation in the United States, 1999-2008. Am J Transplant 2010;10:1020–1034.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Mr. Parmanand Tiwari and Mrs. Anju Sharma for maintaining the electronic data records of our Department, Stoma Clinic and Dietitian.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dr. Anand Nagar: collected the data, analysed, and prepared the manuscript

Dr. Siddharth Mehrotra: analysed the data and prepared manuscript

Dr. Amitabh Yadav: helped in editing

Dr. Vivek Mangla: analysed and edited

Dr. Shailendra Lalwani: analysed and edited

Dr. Naimish Mehta: edited

Dr. Samiran Nundy: supervised the study, analysed the data, and edited the final manuscript

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anand Nagar.

Ethics declarations

Informed consent was taken and Institutional ethical clearance was not taken.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nagar, A., Mehrotra, S., Yadav, A. et al. Distal Bowel Re-feeding in Patients with Proximal Jejunostomy. J Gastrointest Surg 22, 1251–1257 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-3752-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-3752-7

Keywords

Navigation