Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gastrectomy with Extended Lymphadenectomy: a North American Perspective

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Despite evidence of oncologic benefits from extended (D2) lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer from many East Asian studies, there is persistent debate over its use in the West, mainly due to perceived high rates of morbidity and mortality. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of D2 dissection in a high-volume North American center.

Methods

A prospectively entered database of all patients undergoing gastrectomy for cancer at a North American referral center from 2005 to 2016 was reviewed. Wedge resections, thoracoabdominal approach, emergency surgery, palliative operations, and non-adenocarcinoma cases were excluded.

Results

Of 366 non-bariatric gastrectomies over this period, 175 met the inclusion criteria. Median age was 73 years and 69% were male. One hundred forty-one patients (80%) underwent D2 dissection, the rest having D1. There was no difference in postoperative complications (D1 = 44%: D2 = 42%), anastomotic leaks (D1 = 6%: D2 = 5%), and same-admission or 30-day mortality (D1 = 6%: D2 = 2%). D2 dissection was associated with higher pathological stage (72% > stage 1 vs 38% > stage 1; p < 0.05) and median lymph node yield (30 vs 14; p < 0.05), with no difference in complete resection (R0) rate (D1 = 98% vs D2 = 92%). Laparoscopic approach was employed in 34% (45/141) of D2 cases, resulting in shorter median length of stay (6 days vs 9; p < 0.05) and equivalent oncologic outcomes compared to open D2.

Conclusion

This study supports the use of D2 lymphadenectomy, by either open or laparoscopic approach, in high-volume North American centers as a safe and effective oncologic procedure for gastric cancer, with equivalent complication rates and superior lymph node yield to traditional D1 dissection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization. Stomach Cancer: estimated incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012. Available at: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_cancer.aspx. Accessed February 25, 2017

  2. Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Jackson D, Hanna GB. Long-term survival after gastrectomy for cancer in randomized, controlled oncological trials: comparison between West and East. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20(7): 2328–2338.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. El-Sedfy A, Dixon M, Seevaratnam R, Bocicariu A, Cardoso R, Mahar A et al. Personalized Surgery for Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Meta-analysis of D1 versus D2 Lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22(6): 1820–1827.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Macdonald JS. Gastric cancer: Nagoya is not New York. J Clin Oncol 2011;29(33): 4348–4350. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.37.5691.

  5. Noguchi Y, Yoshikawa T, Tsuburaya A, Motohashi H, Karpeh MS, Brennan MF. Is gastric carcinoma different between Japan and the United States? Cancer 2000;89(11): 2237–2246.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferri L. Extended lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer is crucial. World J Surg 2013;37(8): 1768–1772.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Strong VE, Yoon SS. Extended lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer is debatable. World J Surg 2013;37(8): 1773–1777.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Petrelli NJ. The debate is over; it’s time to move on. J Clin Oncol 2004;11(22): 2041–2042. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.03.956

  9. Roggin KK, Posner MC. D3 or not D3 … that is not the question. The Lancet Oncology 2006;7(4): 279–280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma – 2nd English edition. Gastric Cancer 1998;1: 10–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fujii M, Sasaki J, Nakajima T. State of the art in the treatment of gastric cancer: from the 71st Japanese Gastric Cancer Congress. Gastric Cancer 1999;2(3):151–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Songun I, Putter H, Kranenbarg EM, Sasako M, van de Velde CJ. Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11(5): 439–449.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cuschieri A, Fayers P, Fielding J, Craven J, Bancewicz J, Joypaul V, Cook P. Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial. The Surgical Cooperative Group. Lancet 1996;347(9007): 995–999.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cuschieri A, Weeden S, Fielding J, Bancewicz J, Craven J, Joypaul V et al. Patient survival after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: long-term results of the MRC randomized surgical trial. Surgical Co-operative Group. Br J Cancer 1999;79(9–10): 1522–1530.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hartgrink HH, van de Velde CJ, Putter H, Bonenkamp JJ, Klein Kranenbarg E, Songun I et al. Extended lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: who may benefit? Final results of the randomized Dutch gastric cancer group trial. J Clin Oncol 2004;22(11): 2069–2077.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240(2): 205–213.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Washington K. 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: stomach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(12):3077–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ronellenfitsch U, Najmeh S, Andalib A, Perera RM, Rousseau MC, Mulder DS et al. Functional outcomes and quality of life after proximal gastrectomy with esophagogastrostomy using a narrow gastric conduit. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(3):772–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Martin RC, Jaques DP, Brennan MF, Karpeh M. Extended local resection for advanced gastric cancer: increased survival versus increased morbidity. Ann Surg 2002;236(2): 159–165.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Randle RW, Swords DS, Levine EA, Fino NF, Squires MH, Poultsides G et al. Optimal extent of lymphadenectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma: A 7-institution study of the U.S. gastric cancer collaborative. J Surg Oncol 2016;113(7): 750–755.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y, Cao H, Hu J et al. Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Versus Open D2 Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol 2016;34(12): 1350–1357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen K, Xu XW, Zhang RC, Pan Y, Wu D, Mou YP. Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopy-assisted and open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19(32): 5365–5376.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Inagawa S, Adachi S, Oda T, Kawamoto T, Koike N, Fukao K. Effect of fat volume on postoperative complications and survival rate after D2 dissection for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2000;3(3): 141–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dhar DK, Kubota H, Tachibana M, Kotoh T, Tabara H, Masunaga R et al. Body mass index determines the success of lymph node dissection and predicts the outcome of gastric carcinoma patients. Oncology 2000;59(1): 18–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mortensen K, Nilsson M, Slim K, Schäfer M, Mariette C, Braga M et al. Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Br J Surg 2014;101(10): 1209–1229.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cady B. Basic principles in surgical oncology. Arch Surg 1997;132(4): 338–346.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Noguchi Y, Imada T, Matsumoto A, Coit DG, Brennan MF. Radical surgery for gastric cancer. A review of the Japanese experience. Cancer 1989;64(10): 2053–2062.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Smith DD, Schwarz RR, Schwarz RE. Impact of total lymph node count on staging and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: data from a large US-population database. J Clin Oncol 2005;23(28): 7114–7124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Datta J, Lewis RS, Jr., Mamtani R, Stripp D, Kelz RR, Drebin JA et al. Implications of inadequate lymph node staging in resectable gastric cancer: a contemporary analysis using the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer 2014;120(18): 2855–2865.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu CW, Hsiung CA, Lo SS, Hsieh MC, Chen JH, Li AF et al. Nodal dissection for patients with gastric cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2006;7(4): 309–315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bonenkamp JJ, Hermans J, Sasako M, van de Velde CJ, Welvaart K, Songun I et al. Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med 1999;340(12): 908–914.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. McCulloch P, Niita ME, Kazi H, Gama-Rodrigues JJ. Gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for primary treatment of gastric cancer. Br J Surg 2005;92(1): 5–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jiang L, Yang KH, Guan QL, Zhao P, Chen Y, Tian JH. Survival and recurrence free benefits with different lymphadenectomy for resectable gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol 2013;107(8): 807–814.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mocellin S, McCulloch P, Kazi H, Gama-Rodrigues JJ, Yuan Y, Nitti D. Extent of lymph node dissection for adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;12(8): Cd001964. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001964.pub4

  35. Degiuli M, Sasako M, Ponti A, Vendrame A, Tomatis M, Mazza C et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing survival after D1 or D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Br J Surg 2014;101(2): 23–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Alexandre Gosselin-Tardif contributed to study design, to data acquisition and analysis, as well as to manuscript drafting.

Jessica Li contributed to data acquisition and analysis, as well as to manuscript revision.

Ioana Nicolau contributed to data analysis and interpretation, as well as to manuscript revision.

Juan Carlos Molina contributed to data acquisition and to manuscript revision.

Jonathan Cools-Lartigue contributed to data acquisition and to manuscript revision.

Liane Feldman contributed to study design, to data interpretation, and to manuscript revision.

Jonathan Spicer contributed to study design, to data interpretation, and to manuscript revision.

Carmen Mueller contributed to study design, to data interpretation, and to manuscript drafting and revision.

Lorenzo Ferri contributed to study design, to data interpretation, and to manuscript revision.

All authors have given final approval of the version to be published, and all have agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandre Gosselin-Tardif.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gosselin-Tardif, A., Lie, J., Nicolau, I. et al. Gastrectomy with Extended Lymphadenectomy: a North American Perspective. J Gastrointest Surg 22, 414–420 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3633-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3633-5

Keywords

Navigation