Abbreviations
- ACB:
-
Average Complication Burden
- CR-POPF:
-
clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula
- FRS:
-
Fistula Risk Score
- ISGPF:
-
International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula
- IQR:
-
interquartile range
- OR:
-
odds ratio
- PD:
-
pancreatoduodenectomy
- PMI:
-
Postoperative Morbidity Index
- POPF:
-
postoperative pancreatic fistula
- RCT:
-
randomized controlled trial
References
Pratt WB, Maithel SK, Vanounou T, Huang ZS, Callery MP, Vollmer CM, Jr. Clinical and economic validation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) classification scheme. Ann Surg. 2007; 245(3):443–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000251708.70219.d2.
McMillan MT, Vollmer CM, Jr., Asbun HJ, Ball CG, Bassi C, Beane JD et al. The Characterization and Prediction of ISGPF Grade C Fistulas Following Pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016; 20(2):262–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-015-2884-2.
Crist DW, Sitzmann JV, Cameron JL. Improved hospital morbidity, mortality, and survival after the Whipple procedure. Ann Surg. 1987; 206(3):358–65.
McMillan MT, Soi S, Asbun HJ, Ball CG, Bassi C, Beane JD et al. Risk-adjusted Outcomes of Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Model for Performance Evaluation. Ann Surg. 2016; 264(2):344–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001537.
Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005; 138(1):8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001.
Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R, Weerts J, Feryn T, Roeyen G et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14(7):655–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045 (13)70126-8.
Keck T, Wellner UF, Bahra M, Klein F, Sick O, Niedergethmann M et al. Pancreatogastrostomy Versus Pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction After PANCreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC, DRKS 00000767): Perioperative and Long-term Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2016; 263(3):440–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001240.
Fernandez-Cruz L, Cosa R, Blanco L, Lopez-Boado MA, Astudillo E. Pancreatogastrostomy with gastric partition after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy versus conventional pancreatojejunostomy: a prospective randomized study. Ann Surg. 2008; 248(6):930–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818fefc7.
Figueras J, Sabater L, Planellas P, Munoz-Forner E, Lopez-Ben S, Falgueras L et al. Randomized clinical trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy on the rate and severity of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2013; 100 (12):1597–605. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs. 9252.
Wellner UF, Sick O, Olschewski M, Adam U, Hopt UT, Keck T. Randomized controlled single-center trial comparing pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after partial pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012; 16(9):1686–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1940-4.
McMillan MT, Malleo G, Bassi C, Sprys MH, Vollmer CM, Jr. Defining the practice of pancreatoduodenectomy around the world. HPB (Oxford). 2015; 17 (12):1145–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb. 12475.
Miller BC, Christein JD, Behrman SW, Drebin JA, Pratt WB, Callery MP et al. A multi-institutional external validation of the fistula risk score for pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014; 18(1):172–79; discussion 9-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2337-8.
Shubert CR, Wagie AE, Farnell MB, Nagorney DM, Que FG, Reid Lombardo KM et al. Clinical Risk Score to Predict Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreatoduodenectomy: Independent External Validation for Open and Laparoscopic Approaches. J Am Coll Surg. 2015; 221(3):689–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg. 2015.05.011.
McMillan MT, Christein JD, Callery MP, Behrman SW, Drebin JA, Kent TS et al. Prophylactic octreotide for pancreatoduodenectomy: more harm than good? HPB (Oxford). 2014; 16 (10):954–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb. 12314.
McMillan MT, Fisher WE, Van Buren G, 2nd, Mc Elhany A, Bloomston M, Hughes SJ et al. The value of drains as a fistula mitigation strategy for pancreatoduodenectomy: something for everyone? Results of a randomized prospective multi-institutional study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015; 19(1):21–30; discussion -1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2640-z.
McMillan MT, Ecker BL, Behrman SW, Callery MP, Christein JD, Drebin JA et al. Externalized Stents for Pancreatoduodenectomy Provide Value Only in High-Risk Scenarios. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3289-6.
Sachs TE, Pratt WB, Kent TS, Callery MP, Vollmer CM, Jr. The pancreaticojejunal anastomotic stent: friend or foe? Surgery. 2013;153(5):651–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2012.11.007.
Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS, Chaikof EL, Vollmer CM, Jr. A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2013; 216(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.09.002.
Pratt WB, Callery MP, Vollmer CM, Jr. Risk prediction for development of pancreatic fistula using the ISGPF classification scheme. World J Surg. 2008; 32(3):419–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9388-5.
Porembka MR, Hall BL, Hirbe M, Strasberg SM. Quantitative weighting of postoperative complications based on the accordion severity grading system: demonstration of potential impact using the american college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program. J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 210(3):286–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg. 2009.12.004.
Strasberg SM, Hall BL. Postoperative morbidity index: a quantitative measure of severity of postoperative complications. J Am Coll Surg. 2011; 213(5):616–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg. 2011.07.019.
McMillan MT, Christein JD, Callery MP, Behrman SW, Drebin JA, Hollis RH et al. Comparing the burden of pancreatic fistulas after pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy. Surgery. 2016;159(4):1013–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.10.028.
Schmidt CM, Turrini O, Parikh P, House MG, Zyromski NJ, Nakeeb A et al. Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience. Arch Surg. 2010; 145(7):634–40. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2010.118.
Austin PC. An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011; 46(3):399–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.568786.
Brookhart MA, Schneeweiss S, Rothman KJ, Glynn RJ, Avorn J, Sturmer T. Variable selection for propensity score models. Am J Epidemiol. 2006; 163 (12):1149–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwj149.
Sjolander A. Propensity scores and M-structures. Stat Med. 2009;28(9):1416–20; author reply 20-3. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim. 3532.
Austin PC. Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharm Stat. 2011;10(2):150–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.433.
Vollmer CM, Jr., Lewis RS, Hall BL, Allendorf JD, Beane JD, Behrman SW et al. Establishing a quantitative benchmark for morbidity in pancreatoduodenectomy using ACS-NSQIP, the Accordion Severity Grading System, and the Postoperative Morbidity Index. Ann Surg. 2015;261(3):527–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000843.
Wellner UF, Keck T. Reply to "Pancreatogastrostomy versus Pancreatojejunostomy Following Pancreatoduodenectomy: Comments on RECOPANC Study". Ann Surg. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001642.
Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, Chang DC, Riall TS, Schulick RD et al. Does pancreatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10(9):1280–90; discussion 90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2006.07.020.
Funding
None
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
conception/design (BL Ecker, MT McMillan, L Maggino, CM Vollmer); data acquisition (BL Ecker, MT McMillan, JD Beane, ZV Fong, E Haverick); data interpretation (all authors); drafting (BL Ecker, CM Vollmer); critical revisions (all authors); final approval (all authors)
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Meeting Presentations
Presented at (1) the SSAT Residents and Fellows Research Conference, May 6, 2017, Chicago, IL; and (2) the 2017 SSAT Presidential Plenary Presentation, May 7, 2017, Chicago, IL
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 12 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ecker, B.L., McMillan, M.T., Maggino, L. et al. Pancreatogastrostomy Vs. Pancreatojejunostomy: a Risk-Stratified Analysis of 5316 Pancreatoduodenectomies. J Gastrointest Surg 22, 68–76 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3547-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3547-2