Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How does Structural Injustice Impact Criminal Responsibility?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Criminal Law and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

David Brink’s book Fair Opportunity & Responsibility is a meticulously argued and ultimately convincing book that carefully articulates the requirements for criminal guilt and punishment. As the title suggests, Brink argues that only one who has a fair opportunity to be law-abiding ought to be held responsible when they commit a crime. It is unfair to hold a person responsible if they lack abilities necessary to legal agency at the time of a wrongful act, or if these abilities are severely compromised. In this essay I focus on Brink’s handling of structural injustice and the way it can impact our responsibility practices. Structural injustice is a serious and pervasive problem in the U.S., and it is closely related to crime rates. I argue that structural injustice can ground a partial excuse based on compromised normative competence. This is a possibility that Brink does not explore. Marginalization can compromise one’s ability to make and follow normative judgments in keeping with one’s larger society and the criminal law; and what makes some marginalized persons less culpable is that their ability to recognize and respond to moral and legal reasons is compromised compared to those that are not marginalized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although it seems this might depend on who was stolen from. If a person stole food from an equally starving neighbor, the act may still seem morally wrongful despite the thief’s marginalization.

  2. It may be that if conditions were severe enough – say, if the state were perpetuating genocide against a minority and the crime was committed by a member of that minority – then the state’s moral standing to apply criminal blame and punishment would be diminished.

  3. This can seem a bit confusing, as often we think of an excuse as relevant to normative competence; but Brink indicates one might also have diminished culpability based upon a lack of situational control.

  4. https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndil/pr/leaders-violent-chicago-street-gang-and-several-members-and-associates-charged-federal.

References

  • Brink, D. (2021). Fair Opportunity & Responsibility, Oxford University Press.

  • Jefferson, A. (2022). “Brain Pathology and Moral Responsibility,” in Matt King and Joshua May (eds): Agency in Mental Disorder: Philosophical Dimensions. Oxford University Press.

  • Jefferson, A. and Sifferd, K. (2023). “Responsible Agency and the Importance of Moral Audience,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (online first).

  • McGeer, V. (2015). “Building a better theory of responsibility.” Philosophical Studies 172(10): 2635–2649.

  • Morse, S. (2003). “Diminished Rationality, Diminished Responsibility.” Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. 525.

  • Sifferd, K. (2021). “How is criminal punishment forward-looking?” The Monist 104(4): 540–553 (special issue, ed. by A. Jefferson and P. Robichaud).

  • Sifferd, K. and Jefferson, A. (2022). “Responsibility for Reckless Rape.” Humana Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies 42(15): 119–143 (ed. by O. Deery).

  • Sifferd, K. (2023). “Deserving blame, and sometimes punishment.” Criminal Law & Philosophy (special issue on Michael Moore (2020) Mechanical Minds, ed. by D. Husak and A. Walen)(online first).

  • Vargas, M. (2013). Building Better Beings: A Theory of Moral Responsibility, Oxford University Press.

  • Vargas, M. (2020). “The Philosophy of Accidentality,” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 6(4): 391–409.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katrina L. Sifferd.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sifferd, K. How does Structural Injustice Impact Criminal Responsibility?. Criminal Law, Philosophy (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-023-09697-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-023-09697-1

Keywords

Navigation