Abstract
Replies to symposium commentaries on the book Dark Ghettos: Injustice, Dissent, and Reform.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
See Ekow Yankah, “Whose Burden to Bear? Privilege, Lawbreaking and Race,” Criminal Law and Philosophy (this volume); Erin Kelly, “The Ethics of Law’s Authority,” Criminal Law and Philosophy (this volume); and Charles W. Mills, “Dark Mores: Some Comments on Tommie Shelby’s Dark Ghettos,” Criminal Law and Philosophy (this volume).
See Erin Kelly, The Limits of Blame: Rethinking Punishment and Responsibility (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2018).
See T. M. Scanlon, Moral Dimensions: Permissibility, Meaning, Blame (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2008), chap. 4.
See Tommie Shelby, “Racial Realities and Corrective Justice: A Reply to Charles Mills,” Critical Philosophy of Race 1.2 (2013): 145–162.
John Rawls, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, ed. Erin Kelly (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2001), p. 13.
Tommie Shelby, “Race and Social Justice: Rawlsian Considerations,” Fordham Law Review 72 (2004): 1697–1714. Also see Tommie Shelby, Dark Ghettos: Injustice, Dissent, and Reform (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2016), pp. 22–35.
Rawls, Justice as Fairness, p. 5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shelby, T. Dark Times, Black Light: A Reply to Yankah, Kelly, and Mills. Criminal Law, Philosophy 16, 45–55 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-022-09627-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-022-09627-7