Skip to main content
Log in

Review of A du Bois-Pedain and A Bottoms, eds., Penal Censure: Engagements Within and Beyond Desert Theory

Studies in Penal Theory and Penal Ethics. Oxford: Hart (2019) 328 pp

  • Book Review
  • Published:
Criminal Law and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. von Hirsch, A, Doing Justice: The Choice of Punishments. New York: Hill and Wang (5).

  2. Censure has not always dominated the field. It was preceded by utilitarian accounts of punishment: see, eg, Bedau, HA, ‘Bentham’s Theory of Punishment: Origin and Content’ (1Journal of Bentham Studies 7.

  3. See, eg, Hart’s general justifying aim of punishment, which has important parallels with von Hirsch’s censure: Hart, HLA, ‘Prolegomenon to the Principles of Punishment’ (2) 60 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (New Series) 1.

  4. Chapter 2.

  5. Smith, A, The Theory of Moral Sentiments (4) DD Raphael and AL MacFie, eds. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund (4).

  6. Lacey, N, The Prisoners’ Dilemma: Political Economy and Punishment in Contemporary Democracies (The Hamlyn Lectures). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (3).

  7. Above note 5.

  8. Walen, A, ‘Retributive Justice’ in EN Zalta, ed., Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (6). Available at:

     <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/justice-retributive/>.

  9. Chapter 8.

  10. Watson, G, Respect and Criminal Justice. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press (7).

  11. Chapter 12.

  12. See, eg, R v GB [8] EWCA Crim 1501 and discussed by du Bois-Pedain at pp. 232–33, in which the court deemed it appropriate to impose a mild non-custodial sentence for sexual offences committed by a 67-year-old some fifty years earlier. The offender had expressed remorse and lived an exemplary life of compliance with the law ever since.

References

  • Bedau, HA, ‘Bentham’s Theory of Punishment: Origin and Content’ (2004) Journal of Bentham Studies 7.

  • R v GB [2015] EWCA Crim 1501.

  • Hart, HLA, ‘Prolegomenon to the Principles of Punishment’ (1960) 60 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (New Series) 1.

  • Lacey, N, The Prisoners' Dilemma: Political Economy and Punishment in Contemporary Democracies (The Hamlyn Lectures). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2008).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A, The Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759) DD Raphael and AL MacFie, eds. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund (1982).

  • von Hirsch, A, Doing Justice: The Choice of Punishments. New York: Hill and Wang (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walen, A, ‘Retributive Justice’ in EN Zalta, ed., Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2021). Available at: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/justice-retributive/>.

  • Watson, G, Respect and Criminal Justice. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press (2020).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabrielle Watson.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Watson, G. Review of A du Bois-Pedain and A Bottoms, eds., Penal Censure: Engagements Within and Beyond Desert Theory. Criminal Law, Philosophy 16, 417–422 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-021-09604-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-021-09604-6

Navigation