Abstract
Background
A novel opposition tendon transfer, previously described by Snow and Fink in adults but not in children, can provide better functional results and cosmetic appearance than the currently preferred Huber transfer.
Methods
Thirty-one children were born either without a thumb (17) or with a hypoplastic thumb (14). Thirty-eight thumbs were classified according to the Blauth classification as stages II, IIIA, IIIB, IV, and V respectively. The opposition tendon transfer was performed between the ages of 4 and 10, using the expendable flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) tendon from the ring finger which was passed through a 3-mm-diameter window in the transverse carpal ligament, routed subcutaneously across the palm and attached to the insertion of the abductor pollicis brevis on the base of the proximal phalanx of the thumb. This creates a vector of pull from the ulnar side of the hand which both abducts and pronates the thumb. Twenty-one hands underwent additional procedures such as four-flap Z-plasty (11), ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (6), joint transfer, full-thickness skin grafting, and distraction lengthening.
Results
The ability of each child to oppose their thumb to the index finger (score 2), middle finger (score 3), ring finger (score 4), or small finger (score 5) was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively by their Kapandji score. Thirty-one children (81.6 %) achieved a postoperative Kapandji score of 5, while 7 children (18.4 %) had a postoperative Kapandji score of 4. No deformities were observed, and the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint was stabilized with the other slip of the FDS when necessary.
Conclusions
An opposition transfer using the FDS tendon of the ring finger through a window in the transverse carpal ligament is a simple and reliable technique for improving thumb function in children born with an absent or hypoplastic thumb. This transfer does not produce a concave deformity in the hypothenar eminence like the Huber transfer, provides better pronation, and affords concurrent stabilization of the MCP joint.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Congenital thumb deficiencies are classified according to the classification system initially developed by Mueller and later refined by Blauth [2]. Opposition tendon transfers may be considered for Blauth type II and IIIA hypoplastic thumbs. Some surgeons have advocated opposition tendon transfers for Blauth type IIIB thumbs [24]. The true incidence of opposition tendon transfers for Blauth types IV and V after pollicization is not known. Depending on surgeon preference, the rate of opposition tendon transfer after pollicization ranges from 0 to 100 % [8, 11, 13, 15, 17, 27, 28].
Several opposition transfers have been described in children—the abductor digiti minimi (ADM—Huber transfer) [5, 8, 9, 13–15, 20, 21], extensor pollicis longus (EPL) [18], palmaris longus (Camitz transfer) [9], and the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) [19]. Of all these techniques, the Huber transfer seems to be the most frequently used. However, the biomechanical characteristics of an FDS transfer restore 60 % of thenar muscle strength whereas the ADM transfer is significantly weaker [7]. This finding lends credence to using the FDS for opposition tendon transfers in adults. Royle and Thomson described a technique in which the FDS of the ring finger is routed subcutaneously above the carpal tunnel and sutured to the head of the thumb metacarpal [23, 30]. Bunnell routed the FDS through a pulley using a distal-based slip of the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) or a free tendon graft at the level of the pisiform bone [3]. Snow and Fink introduced a novel routing of the FDS through a window in the flexor retinaculum for adults with median nerve palsy [25]. To our knowledge, this method has only been used in a few adults with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and paralytic claw-thumb deformity [19, 26, 31] but has never been described in pediatric patients.
Methods
Patients
From 1995 to 2013, Snow-Fink opposition tendon transfers were performed in 38 thumbs in 31 children. Twenty-two were post-pollicization thumbs while 16 were hypoplastic thumbs. Of the 31 children, seven had bilateral and 24 had unilateral procedures. Preoperatively, the thumbs were classified according to the Blauth classification modified by Manske and McCarrol [16]. The patient cohort consisted of 4 type II thumbs, 9 type IIIA thumbs, 3 type IIIB thumbs, 3 type IV thumbs, and 17 type V thumbs. Two thumbs were part of five-fingered hands. The mean age at the time of operation was 5.22 years with a range from 4 to 10 years. All children were followed postoperatively for an average of 4.7 years (range of 1 to 14 years).
Surgical Technique
A 1-cm-long transverse or oblique incision at the base of the ring finger or an oblique incision over the proximal phalanx is extended down to the flexor tendon sheath. The A1 pulley is incised and the two slips of the FDS tendon are identified. With flexion of the finger, the two slips of the FDS tendon are transected. A second curved incision is made at the base of the hand and extended down through the subcutaneous tissues to the anterior surface of the transverse carpal ligament. A 3-mm-diameter window is made along the ulnar border of the transverse carpal ligament midway between the proximal and distal margins (Figs. 1 and 2). The FDS tendon to the ring finger is extracted through this window (Fig. 3). A third incision is made over the radial aspect of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint of the thumb, and a flap is elevated to identify the insertion of the abductor pollicis brevis tendon. A subcutaneous tunnel is made connecting this incision with the incision at the base of the hand (Fig. 4). Using a tendon passer, the FDS tendon is routed through this tunnel to the insertion of the abductor pollicis brevis tendon. With the wrist in neutral and the thumb in full abduction, the FDS tendon is retracted to its resting position and sutured to the abductor pollicis brevis tendon just proximal to the MCP joint. Additional procedures such as ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction (Fig. 5), four-flap Z-plasty, full-thickness skin graft, distraction lengthening, and joint transfers are performed when necessary. The thumb is immobilized in full abduction for 6 weeks.
Measurements
We determined that the most pertinent assessment of opposition was the modified Kapandji scale [9, 12]. In this modified scale, a score of 2 is given if the thumb pad can oppose to the index finger pad. A score of 3, 4, or 5 describes if the thumb pad can oppose to the pads of the long, ring, and small fingers respectively. The opposition of all children was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively using this Kapandji scale.
Results
Table 1 shows the comparison of preoperative and postoperative Kapandji scores. Sixteen children had a preoperative Kapandji score of 2 and 22 patients had a preoperative Kapandji score of 3. Opposition improved in all children after tendon transfer. Thirty-one (81.6 %) children had a postoperative Kapandji score of 5, and 7 (18.4 %) had a postoperative Kapandji score of 4. There was no statistically significant difference in the Kapandji scores between hypoplastic thumbs (Blauth types II, IIIA, and IIIB) compared with pollicized index fingers (Blauth types IV and V). Thirteen of 16 Blauth II, IIIA, and IIIB thumbs (81.2 %); 16 of 20 Blauth IV and V thumbs; and 13 of 17 (76.5 %) Blauth V thumbs achieved Kapandji scores of 5 postoperatively (Figs. 6 and 7; Table 1). Postoperative Kapandji scores of 4 were similar in Blauth II, IIIA, and IIIB thumbs (18.8 %) and Blauth V thumbs (23.5 %) (Table 1). Twenty-one thumbs underwent additional procedures such as UCL reconstruction, four-flap Z-plasty, full-thickness skin grafting, distraction lengthening, and joint transfer (Table 2). Postoperative improvement in functional activity is difficult to measure in young children, but from questionnaires evaluating thumb function and appearance, parents universally reported that the tendon transfer had improved their child’s hand function as well as the appearance of the thenar eminence. No surgical complications occurred.
Discussion
The Huber transfer for the reconstruction of hypoplastic thumbs first gained attention after Littler’s report in 1963 [14]. It has since become the preferred procedure by most hand surgeons to restore opposition of the thumb in children, and many studies have demonstrated its success [5, 13, 15, 20, 21, 27, 29]. Manske and Latimer have reported the two largest series of Huber transfers of 21 and 20 children respectively [13, 15].
Despite the popularity of the Huber transfer, many alternative opposition transfers have been reported in the literature. Mennen described an opposition transfer using the extensor pollicis longus (EPL) tendon dividing it proximal to the MCP joint and rerouting it subcutaneously anterior to the wrist deep to the extensor pollicis brevis tendon [18]. Bunnell described using the FDS of the ring finger, looping it around the FCU tendon or constructing a pulley at the pisiform bone using a distal-based slip of the FCU, to change the vector of pull diagonally across the thenar eminence [3]. Camitz described using the palmaris longus tendon elongated with a strip of the palmar fascia [4].
The Snow-Fink transfer uses the FDS of the ring finger passed through a small window in the transverse carpal ligament as a pulley for restoring opposition and has only been described in adults [25]. Snow claimed that the various techniques of pulley-based FDS opposition transfers were inefficient because of adhesions between the tendon and the pulley [25]. He described this technique in three adults with median nerve palsy. Srinivasan reported using the Snow-Fink transfer to restore opposition in patients with combined median and ulnar nerve palsy due to leprosy [26]. Successful abduction-opposition was achieved in 30 out of 33 thumbs (90 %) and satisfactory stabilization of the distal phalanx in 85 %. However, his criterion of satisfactory opposition was pulp-to-pulp opposition of the thumb to the long finger, which corresponds to a modified Kapandji score of 3. Michelinakis and Vourexakis described using the Snow-Fink technique in 5 patients with thenar atrophy secondary to Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease [19] and reported good pulp-to-pulp opposition between the thumb and the small finger (modified Kapandji score 5).
The decision as to whether a child requires an opposition tendon transfer after pollicization appears to be mainly surgeon dependent. Review of 25 representative series of mainly hypoplastic thumb reconstructions revealed that only 12 studies mentioned performing an opposition tendon transfer. Varying frequencies of opposition tendon transfers were reported in these 12 studies ranging between 100 % [13, 15], approximately 50 % [8, 27], and almost none [11]. The senior author performs an opposition transfer as a secondary procedure after every pollicization to provide an improved functional and cosmetic outcome.
Evaluating functional outcomes of pollicizations has been recognized to be difficult due to cooperation and communication [8, 22]. Netscher described evaluating outcomes by measuring flexion and extension, grip strength, a functional dexterity test, and the Jebsen Hand Function Test [1]. Hovius assessed outcomes by measuring range of motion, grip strength, visual analog scale for function and appearance, and the Rotterdam Intrinsic Hand Myometer for strengths of individual fingers [8]. Percival evaluated outcomes by measuring tip pinch, pulp pinch, opposition, grasp, mobility, sensation, and cosmesis [22]. However, most of these studies measure general hand function and not specifically opposition. In our opinion, the modified Kapandji score and a specific questionnaire assessing thumb function and appearance are most applicable for evaluation of opposition tendon transfers. We have used a modified Kapandji score, rather than the full Kapandji score, because opposition of the thumb to the base of the small finger is difficult to achieve in hypoplastic thumbs and pollicized thumbs since the interphalangeal joint and extrinsic flexor and extensor tendons are usually abnormal.
We believe the Snow-Fink technique is a superior reconstructive method compared to the widely used Huber transfer for several reasons. Firstly, it allows the surgeon to reconstruct the ulnar collateral ligament of the MCP joint at the same time. One slip of the sublimis is used for the opposition tendon transfer, and the other slip can be used to reconstruct the ulnar collateral ligament (Fig. 5). This is not possible with the Huber transfer. Secondly, the Huber transfer tends to leave an obvious concavity in the hypothenar eminence, which parents feel only increases the abnormal appearance of their child’s hand. Thirdly, the opposition strength provided by the ring finger FDS has been shown to be significantly greater than the strength provided by the abductor digiti minimi or palmaris longus opposition transfers [7]. Finally, the vector of pull of the Snow-Fink transfer diagonally across the thenar eminence from the pisiform tends to abduct and pronate the thumb compared with the Huber transfer which only tends to flex the MCP joint of the thumb.
In addition to a window in the transverse carpal ligament used in the Snow-Fink technique, a distal-based slip of flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU), Guyon’s canal, and a slit through the transverse carpal ligament have all been described as pulleys for an FDS opposition transfer. The FCU pulley may stretch out over time and provides less palmar abduction compared to the Snow-Fink technique since the location of the pulley is more proximal [10]. Routing the FDS tendon through Guyon’s canal can irritate or compress the ulnar nerve. A recent study has reported incising the radial side of the transverse carpal ligament to use as a pulley [6], but this shifts the vector of pull radially which also decreases palmar abduction. Another advantage of the Snow-Fink technique is that the window minimizes tendon adhesions, which may occur in the FCU and Guyon’s canal pulleys [25].
In conclusion, the Snow-Fink opposition tendon transfer is a simple, reproducible technique that consistently results in good outcomes (Kapandji scores 4 or 5) in children with hypoplastic thumbs or as a secondary procedure after pollicization.
References
Aliu O, Netscher DT, Staines KG, Thornby J, Armenta A. A 5-year interval evaluation of function after pollicization for congenital thumb aplasia using multiple outcome measures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:198–205.
Blauth W. Der hypoplastische daumen. Archiv für orthopädische und Unfall-Chirurgie, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Frakturenlehre und der orthopädisch-chirurgischen Technik 1967;62:225–46
Bunnell S. Opposition of the thumb. J Bone Joint Surg. 1938;20:269–84.
Camitz H. Surgical treatment of paralysis of opponens muscle of thumbs. Acta Chir Scand. 1929;65:77–81.
Cawrse N, Sammut D. A modification in technique of abductor digiti minimi (Huber) opponensplasty. J Hand Surg (Br). 2003;28:233–7.
Christen T, Dautel G. Type II and IIIA thumb hypoplasia reconstruction. J Hand Surg. 2013;38:2009–15.
Cooney WP, Linscheid RL, An K-N. Opposition of the thumb: an anatomic and biomechanical study of tendon transfers. J Hand Surg. 1984;9:777–86.
de Kraker M, Selles RW, van Vooren J, Stam HJ, Hovius SE. Outcome after pollicization: comparison of patients with mild and severe longitudinal radial deficiency. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:544e–51e.
de Roode CP, James MA, McCarroll Jr HR. Abductor digit minimi opponensplasty: technique, modifications, and measurement of opposition. Tech Hand Upper Extrem Surg. 2010;14:51–3.
Duymaz A, Karabekmez FE, Zhao C, An K-N, Amadio PC, Moran SL. Tendon transfer for the restoration of thumb opposition: the effects of friction and pulley location. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:604–9.
Foucher G, Medina J, Lorea P, Pivato G. Principalization of pollicization of the index finger in congenital absence of the thumb. Tech Hand Upper Extrem Surg. 2005;9:96–104.
Kapandji A. Cotation clinique de l’opposition et de la contre-opposition du pouce. In: Annales de Chirurgie de la Main; 1986: Elsevier; 1986. p. 67–73.
Latimer J, Shah M, Kay S. Abductor digiti minimi transfer for the restoration of opposition in children. J Hand Surg (Br). 1994;19:653–8.
Littler JW, Cooley SG. Opposition of the thumb and its restoration by abductor digiti quinti transfer. J Bone Joint Surg. 1963;45:1389–484.
Manske PR, McCarroll Jr HR. Abductor digiti minimi opponensplasty in congenital radial dysplasia. J Hand Surg. 1978;3:552–9.
Manske PR, McCarroll Jr H, James M. Type III—a hypoplastic thumb. J Hand Surg. 1995;20:246–53.
Manske PR, Rotman MB, Dailey LA. Long-term functional results after pollicization for the congenitally deficient thumb. J Hand Surg. 1992;17:1064–72.
Mennen U. Extensor pollicis longus opposition transfer. J Hand Surg. 1992;17:809–11.
Michelinakis E, Vourexakis H. Tendon transfer for intrinsic-muscle paralysis of the thumb in Charcot-Marie Tooth neuropathy. Hand. 1981;13:276–8.
Oberlin C, Gilbert A. Transfer of the abductor digiti minimi (quinti) in radial deformities of the hand in children. Ann de Chir de la main: Organe offi des societes de Chir de la main. 1983;3:215–20.
Ogino T, Minami A, Fukuda K. Abductor digiti minimi opponensplasty in hypoplastic thumb. J Hand Surg (Br). 1986;11:372–7.
Percival N, Sykes P, Chandraprakasam T. A method of assessment of pollicisation. J Hand Surg (Br). 1991;16:141–3.
Royle N. An operation for paralysis of the intrinsic muscles of the thumb. J Am Med Assoc. 1938;111:612–3.
Shibata M, Yoshizu T, Seki T, Goto M, SAITO H, Tajima T. Reconstruction of a congenital hypoplastic thumb with use of a free vascularized metatarsophalangeal joint. J Bone Joint Surg. 1998;80:1469–76.
Snow JW, Fink GH. Use of a transverse carpal ligament window for the pulley in tendon transfers for median nerve palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1971;48:238–40.
Srinivasan H. Correction of the paralytic claw-thumb by two-tailed transfer of the superficialis tendon through a window in the flexor retinaculum. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;69:90–5.
Staines KG, Majzoub R, Thornby J, Netscher DT. Functional outcome for children with thumb aplasia undergoing pollicization. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:1314–23.
Sykes P, Chandraprakasam T, Percival N. Pollicisation of the index finger in congenital anomalies: a retrospective analysis. J Hand Surg (Br). 1991;16:144–7.
Takayama S, Nakao Y, Ikegami H, Nakamura T. Modified abductor digiti minimi opponensplasty in congenital hypoplastic thumb with laxity of metacarpophalangeal joint. Tech Hand Upper Extrem Surg. 2002;6:166–70.
Thompson TC. A modified operation for opponens paralysis; 1942
Wood VE, Huene D, Nguyen J. Treatment of the upper limb in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. J Hand Surg (Br). 1995;20:511–8.
Conflict of Interest
The authors, Alfred P. Yoon and Neil F. Jones, declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Statement of Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.
Statement of Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
About this article
Cite this article
Yoon, A.P., Jones, N.F. The Snow-Fink technique as an opposition tendon transfer for children born with a hypoplastic or absent thumb. HAND 10, 732–737 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-015-9745-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-015-9745-z