Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

One-per-mil tumescent technique for bone and joint surgery in hand

  • Published:
HAND

Abstract

Background

This study aims to explore the effectiveness of one-per-mil tumescent technique in hand surgery, which involves bone and joint.

Methods

This is a case series study on 14 patients with 15 operative fields. One-per-mil solution is formulated by mixing 0.05 mL of 1:1,000 epinephrine and 100 mg lidocaine in 50-mL saline solution. The solution was injected subcutaneously into the operative area until the skin turned pale. The surgery started 7–10 min after the last injection. We classified the operative field clarity into four categories: totally bloodless, minimum bleeding, acceptable bleeding, and bloody operative field. We also recorded the amount of tumescent solution, top-ups needed, length of surgery, type of anesthesia, and intraoperative pain reported by the patients under local anesthesia.

Results

Five patients were operated on under local anesthesia while the other ten were under general anesthesia. Eight cases yielded totally bloodless operative fields, while seven were classified as acceptable bleeding. There were no top-ups and conversion of anesthesia needed during surgery.

Conclusions

We consider one-per-mil tumescent technique as a promising successor of pneumatic tourniquet in bone and joint surgery, especially for lengthy procedures on hand and upper extremity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Conroy PH, O’Rourke J. Tumescent anaesthesia. Surgeon. 2013;11(4):210–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Denkler K. A comprehensive review of epinephrine in the finger: to do or not to do. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108(1):114–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fitzcharles-Bowe C, Denkler K, Lalonde D. Finger injection with high-dose (1:1,000) epinephrine: does it cause finger necrosis and should it be treated? Hand. 2007;2(1):5–11.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hubert SR, Richard AC, Willis HJ. Tourniquet hemostasis. A clinical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;177:230–4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lalonde D. Minimally invasive anesthesia in wide awake hand surgery. Hand Clin. 2014;30(1):1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lalonde DH. Reconstruction of the hand with wide awake surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 2011;38(4):761–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lalonde DH. Wide-awake flexor tendon repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123(2):623–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lalonde DH, Lalonde JF. Discussion. Do not use epinephrine in digital blocks: myth or truth? Part II. A retrospective review of 1111 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(6):2035–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lundborg G. Guest editorial bloodless field and tourniquet compression. Acta Orthop Scand. 1991;62(6):513–4.

  10. Oragui E, Parsons A, White T, Longo UG, Khan WS. Tourniquet use in upper limb surgery. Hand. 2011;6(2):165–73.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Prasetyono TOH. Tourniquet-free hand surgery using the one-per-mil tumescent technique. Arch Plast Surg. 2013;40(2):129–33.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Prasetyono TOH, Putri NM. Epinephrine in the tumescent technique for hypospadia surgery. Med J Indones. 2012;21(3):175–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Prasetyono TOH, Biben JA. One-per-mil tumescent technique for upper extremity surgeries: broadening the indication. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2014;39(1):3–12.e7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sato J, Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Takeda M. Safety and efficacy of a new tourniquet system. BMC Surg. 2012;12:17.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thomson CJ, Lalonde DH, Denkler KA, et al. A critical look at the evidence for and against elective epinephrine use in the finger. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(1):260–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wakai A, Winter DC, Street JT, et al. Pneumatic tourniquets in extremity surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2001;9(5):345–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilhelmi BJ, Blackwell SJ, Miller JH, et al. Do not use epinephrine in digital blocks: myth or truth? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(2):393–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

Theddeus O.H. Prasetyono declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Debby K.A. Saputra declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Windi Astriana declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Statement of Human Rights

We warrant that all procedures in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008(5).

Statement of Informed Consent

All subjects provided written informed consent as well as photo and video release consent prior to the procedure.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theddeus O. H. Prasetyono.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prasetyono, T.O.H., Saputra, D.K.A. & Astriana, W. One-per-mil tumescent technique for bone and joint surgery in hand. HAND 10, 123–127 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-014-9661-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-014-9661-7

Keywords

Navigation