Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The incidence of postoperative flare reaction and tissue complications in Dupuytren’s disease using tension-free immobilization

  • Therapy Articles
  • Published:
HAND

Abstract

Purpose

Open fasciectomy represents a standard treatment of Dupuytren’s disease. Although patients are commonly immobilized in extension to prevent postoperative contracture formation, immobilizing the extremity under tension may precipitate a flare reaction and scar-related complications. This study explores the incidence of flare reaction and other complications with postoperative tension-free splinting after fasciectomy for Dupuytren’s contracture.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients’ charts that consisted of 228 procedures in 191 patients who underwent surgery by the senior author between 2000 and 2010. Postoperative notes were reviewed for wound healing problems, scar appearance, flare reaction, and complications. The grading system defined by Evans et al. was used to standardize flare reaction and scar complications.

Results

Using tension-free splinting, the incidence of flare reaction was 3.5 % (8/228). The eight patients that had flare reactions had mild involvement, and no severe reaction was observed. Fifteen patients had hypertrophic scars, eight had hypersensitive scars, and six had recurrent contractures.

Conclusions

The incidence of flare reaction using tension-free immobilization postoperatively was low in our study. According to our findings, wound healing problems are rare when tensionless splinting is utilized.

Type of study/level of evidence

Case series, Level IV, Therapeutic study

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alman BA, Greel DA, Ruby LK, Goldberg MJ, Wolfe HJ. Regulation of proliferation and platelet-derived growth factor expression in palmar fibromatosis (Dupuytren contracture) by mechanical strain. J Orthop Res. 1996;14:722–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anwar MU, Al Ghazal SK, Boome RS. Results of surgical treatment of Dupuytren’s disease in women: a review of 109 consecutive patients. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2007;32:1423–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Becker GW, Davis TR. The outcome of surgical treatments for primary Dupuytren’s disease—a systematic review. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2010;35:623–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boyer MI, Gelberman RH. Complications of the operative treatment of Dupuytren’s disease. Hand Clin. 1999;15:161–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown JJ, Ollier W, Thomson W, Bayat A. Positive association of Hla-Drb1*15 with Dupuytren’s disease in Caucasians. Tissue Antigens. 2008;72:166–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Citron N, Hearnden A. Skin tension in the aetiology of Dupuytren’s disease; a prospective trial. J Hand Surg (Br). 2003;28:528–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Denkler K. Surgical complications associated with fasciectomy for Dupuytren’s disease: a 20-year review of the English literature. Eplasty. 2010;10:e15.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Early PF. Population studies in Dupuytren’s contracture. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1962;44-B:602–13.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Evans RB, Dell PC, Fiolkowski P. A clinical report of the effect of mechanical stress on functional results after fasciectomy for Dupuytren’s contracture. J Hand Ther. 2002;15:331–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gelberman RH, Panagis JS, Hergenroeder PT, Zakaib GS. Wound complications in the surgical management of Dupuytren’s contracture: a comparison of operative incisions. Hand. 1982;14:248–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gupta R, Allen F, Tan V, Bozentka DJ, Bora FW, Osterman AL. The effect of shear stress on fibroblasts derived from Dupuytren’s tissue and normal palmar fascia. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1998;23:945–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hall PN, Fitzgerald A, Sterne GD, Logan AM. Skin replacement in Dupuytren’s disease. J Hand Surg (Br). 1997;22:193–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hueston JT. Digital Wolfe grafts in recurrent Dupuytren’s contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. 1962;29:342–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hunt TK, Banda MJ, Silver IA. Cell interactions in post-traumatic fibrosis. Ciba Found Symp. 1985;114:127–49.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mackin EJ. Prevention of complications in hand therapy. Hand Clin. 1986;2:429–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mullins PA. Postsurgical rehabilitation of Dupuytren’s disease. Hand Clin. 1999;15:167–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Norotte G, Apoil A, Travers V. A ten years follow-up of the results of surgery for Dupuytren’s disease. A study of fifty-eight cases. Ann Chir Main. 1988;7:277–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Prosser R, Conolly WB. Complications following surgical treatment for Dupuytren’s contracture. J Hand Ther. 1996;9:344–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rayan GM. Palmar fascial complex anatomy and pathology in Dupuytren’s disease. Hand Clin. 1999;15:73–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rayan GM. Dupuytren disease: anatomy, pathology, presentation, and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:189–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rives K, Gelberman R, Smith B, Carney K. Severe contractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint in Dupuytren’s disease: results of a prospective trial of operative correction and dynamic extension splinting. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1992;17:1153–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith AC. Diagnosis and indications for surgical treatment. Hand Clin. 1991;7:635–42. 643.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Thurston AJ. Dupuytren’s disease. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2003;85:469–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

Michael Rivlin declares that he has no conflict of interest in this article.

Meredith Osterman declares that she has no conflict of interest in this article.

Sidney M. Jacoby declares that he has no conflict of interest in this article.

Terri Skirven declares that she has no conflict of interest in this article.

Uzoma Ukomadu declares that he has no conflict of interest in this article.

A. Lee Osterman declares that he has no conflict of interest in this article.

Declaration (Statement of Informed Consent and Statement of Human and Animal Rights)

The above study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national review board) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 and 2008. The study was performed under the guidelines of our institutional review board (Thomas Jefferson University Institutional Review Board); protected patient information was de-identified and has not and would not be used in the publication of this study. Informed consent was not obtained from all patients for being included in the study as the study was determined exempt due to the use of a de-identified radiological database, and no patient identifiers were used in accordance and with the approval of the Institutional Review Board at our institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Rivlin.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rivlin, M., Osterman, M., Jacoby, S.M. et al. The incidence of postoperative flare reaction and tissue complications in Dupuytren’s disease using tension-free immobilization. HAND 9, 459–465 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-014-9638-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-014-9638-6

Keywords

Navigation