Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Digital radiographic evaluation of hand-wrist bone maturation and prediction of age in South Indian adolescents

  • Published:
HAND

Abstract

Background

In the growing years, indicators of the level of maturational development of the individual provide the best means for evaluating biologic age and the associated timing of skeletal growth. The relative stage of maturity of a child may be determined by comparing the child’s hand-wrist radiograph to the known standards of skeletal development.

Aims and Objectives

In this study, we assessed various levels of skeletal maturation and also identified the relationship between chronological age (CA) and maturation stage using the hand-wrist radiographs in adolescents of Indian origin.

Materials and Methods

Three hundred and thirty hand-wrist digital radiographs of individuals aged 8 to 18 years were evaluated for skeletal maturity levels using Fishman’s method. The data was analysed using the SPSS software package (version 12, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Regression analysis was performed for calculating bone age of both males and females. Spearman’s rank-order correlation coefficients were estimated separately for males and females to assess the relation between CA and maturation level.

Results

An association between skeletal maturation indicator stages and CA (r = 0.82) was significant. Interestingly, female subjects were observed to be advanced in skeletal maturity compared to males. Regression equations were derived to calculate bone age in males, females and the whole sample.

Conclusion

The results of this study showed significant association between hand-wrist skeletal maturation levels and CA. Digital radiographic assessment of hand-wrist skeletal maturation can be used as a better choice for predicting average bone age of an individual because of its simplicity, reliability and lesser radiation exposure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acheson RM. A method of assessing skeletal maturity from radiographs. A report from the Oxford Child Health Survey. J Anat. 1954;88:498–508.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Hadlaq A, Hashim H, Shalan TA, Al-Hawwas A, Mutairi NA, Zahrani TA. Association between chronological and skeletal ages among a sample of Saudi male children. Saudi, Dental Journal. 2007;19(1):1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anibal MS, Leonard SF, Daniel SJ, Denise KK. Facial growth during adolescence in early, average and late maturers. Angle Orthod. 1992;62:185–90.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bala M, Pathak A, Jain RL. Assessment of skeletal age using MP3 and hand-wrist radiographs and its correlation with dental and chronological ages in children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prevent Dent. 2010;28(2):95–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhatia AS, Shah RB, Singh A, Paul R. Evaluating period of accelerated skeletal maturation in Gujarati children between ages 8+ and 14+ years. J Indian Orthod Soc. 2012;46(4):250–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bjork A, Helm S. Prediction of the age of maximum pubertal growth in body height. Angle Orthod. 1967;37:134–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bowden BD. Epiphyseal changes in the hand/wrist area as indicators of adolescent stage. Aust Orthod J. 1976;4:87–104.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Crampton C.W. Physiological age, a fundamental principle. Amer. Phys. Educ. Rev., 13:3–6:1903, reprinted Child Dev., 15:1–52,1944

  9. D Eto LF, Mazzieiro ÊT. Evaluation of the correlation between the stages of mineralization of the lower teeth and the skeletal age observed in the graph of pubertal growth. Rev Dent Press Orthod Ortop Facial. 2005;10:75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. E. Moscatiello VAM, Lederman H, Moscatiello RA, Junior KF, Moscatiello RM. Maturation of cervical vertebrae and its correlation with the skeletal age of hand and wrist as indicators in orthodontic treatment. Rev Dent Press Ortodon Ortop Facial. 2008;13:92–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fishman LS. Chronological versus skeletal age, an evaluation of craniofacial growth. Angle Orthod. 1979;49:181–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fishman LS. Radiographic evaluation of skeletal maturation: a clinically oriented method based on hand-wrist films. Angle Orthod. 1982;52:88–112.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fishman LS. Maturation pattern and prediction during adolescence. Angle Orthod. 1987;57:178–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Flores-Mir C, Burgess CA, Champney M, Jensen RJ, Pitcher MR, Major PW. Correlation of skeletal maturation stages determined by cervical vertebrae and hand-wrist evaluations. Angle Orthod. 2005;76:178–93.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Generoso R, Tavano O, Ribeiro A, Parreira MLJ. Study of the correlation between chronological age and maturation of cervical vertebrae in patients in stage of pubertal growth. Rev Dental Press Orthod Ortop Facial. 2003;8:19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grave KC, Brown T. Skeletal ossification and the adolescent growth spurt. Am J Orthodont. 1976;69:611–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Greulich WW, Pyle SI. Radiographic Atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. 2nd ed. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hagg U, Taranger J. Menarche and voice change as indicators of the pubertal growth spurt. Acta Odontol Scand. 1980;38:179–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hassel B, Farman AG. Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1995;107:58–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Houston WJ, Miller JC, Tanner JM. Prediction of the timing of the adolescent growth spurt from ossification events in hand-wrist films. Br J Orthod. 1979;6:145–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hunter J. The correlation of facial growth with body height and skeletal maturation at adolescence. Angle Orthod. 1996;36:44–54.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hussam M. Abdel Kader. The reliability of dental x-ray film in assessment of MP3 stages of the pubertal growth spurt. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1998;114:427–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Joshi VV, Iyengar AR, Nagesh KS, Gupta J. Comparative study between cervical vertebrae and hand-wrist maturation for the assessment of skeletal age. Rev Clín Pesq Odontol. 2010;6(3):207–13.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kiran S, Sharma VP, Tandon P. Correlative and comparative study of Fishman’s skeletal maturity indicators with CVMI and chronological age in Lucknow population. European Journal of, General Dentistry. 2012;1(3):161–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Koshy S, Tandon S. Dental age assessment: the applicability of Demirjian’s method in South Indian children. Forensic Sci Int. 1998;94:73–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Krailassiri S, Anuwongnukroh N, Dechkunakorn S. Relationships between dental calcification stages and SMI In Thai individuals. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:155–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Liversidge M, Lyons F, Hector MP. The accuracy of three methods of age estimation using radiographic measurements of developing teeth. Forensic Sci Int. 2003;131:22–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Madhu S, Hedge AM, Munshi AK. The developmental stages of the middle phalanx of the third finger (MP3): sole indicator in assessing skeletal maturity? J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2003;27:149–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Prabhakar AR, Panda AK, Raju OS. Applicability of Demirjian’s method of age assessment in children of Davangere. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2002;20:54–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schour, Massler. The development of the human dentition. J Am Dent Assoc 1941:1153–60.

  31. Shamsher Khan RM, Ijaz A. Correlation of dental calcification and skeletal maturity indicators. Annals. 2011;17(1):22–6.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Soegiharto BM, Cunningham SJ, Moles DR. Skeletal maturation in Indonesian and white children assessed with hand-wrist and cervical vertebrae methods. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2008;134:217–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Marshal WA, Healy MJ, Goldstein. Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult’s height (TW2 method). London: London Academic Press; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Todd TW. Atlas of skeletal maturation. 1st ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Uysal T, Sari Z, Ramoglu SI, Basciftci FA. Relationships between dental and skeletal maturity in Turkish subjects. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:657–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Rezwana Begum Mohammed declares no conflicts of interest. Dr. M. Asha Lata Reddy declares no conflicts of interest. Dr. Megha Jain declares no conflicts of interest. Dr. Johar Rajvinder Singh declares no conflicts of interest. Dr. Praveen Sanghvi declares no conflicts of interest. Dr. Anshuj Ajay Rao Thetay declares no conflicts of interest.

Statement of Human and Animal Rights

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the committee of GITAM Dental College and Hospital, Visakhapatnam, India.

Statement of Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients who are being included in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rezwana Begum Mohammed.

About this article

Cite this article

Mohammed, R.B., Reddy, M.A.L., Jain, M. et al. Digital radiographic evaluation of hand-wrist bone maturation and prediction of age in South Indian adolescents. HAND 9, 375–383 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-013-9598-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-013-9598-2

Keywords

Navigation