Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Radiographic indicators of a shared epiphysis in radial polydactyly

  • Published:
HAND

Abstract

Background

Thumb epiphyses cannot be visualized on radiographs in infants with radial polydactyly, making it difficult to classify by Wassel type. The purpose of this study was to identify radiographic features that distinguish a separate epiphysis from a shared epiphysis. This may assist in operative planning and establishing prognosis.

Methods

The charts of 34 radial polydactyly patients treated with surgical reconstruction from 2008 through 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Measurements of the most proximal bones involved in the duplication, including length, width at shaft, width at base, distance between radial and ulnar thumb, and angle between radial and ulnar thumb, were taken from PA radiographs of the thumb by four blinded individuals. The interclass correlation coefficient was calculated to determine inter-observer reliability. Operative notes were reviewed to distinguish between shared and separate epiphyses. Several indices were created from these measurements.

Results

Radiographic measurements showed high inter-observer reliability. There were statistically significant differences between patients with separate and shared epiphyses for indices for the width shaft index, interspace distance, the angle × interspace distance, and the angle × interspace index.

Conclusion

Radiographic differences exist between children with separate and shared epiphyses. In patients with shared epiphyses, the radial thumb tends to be smaller, closer to the ulnar thumb, and less divergent. Threshold values were identified for predicting the status of the epiphysis based on the angle × interspace distance and the angle × interspace index. These values may be used to help determine in advance of surgery if a shared epiphysis exists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chung MS, Baek GH, Gong HS, Lee HJ, Kim J, Rhee SH. Radial polydactyly: proposal for a new classification system based on the 159 duplicated thumbs. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33(2):190–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chung KC, Spilson SV. The frequency and epidemiology of hand and forearm fractures in the United States. J Hand Surg Am. 2001;26(5):908–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ekblom AG, Laurell T, Arner M. Epidemiology of congenital upper limb anomalies in 562 children born in 1997 to 2007: a total population study from stockholm, sweden. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35(11):1742–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Horii E, Nakamura R, Sakuma M, Miura T. Duplicated thumb bifurcation at the metacarpophalangeal joint level: factors affecting surgical outcome. J Hand Surg Am. 1997;22(4):671–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Islam S, Oka I, Fujita S. Anatomical study of preaxial polydactyly in 158 hands. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1992;168(3):459–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Islam S, Watanabe H, Fujita S. Contrast arthrography in thumb polydactyly with variable morphological patterns. J Hand Surg Br. 1992;17(2):178–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Koskimies E, Lindfors N, Gissler M, Peltonen J, Nietosvaara Y. Congenital upper limb deficiencies and associated malformations in Finland: a population-based study. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36(6):1058–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oda T, Pushman AG, Chung KC. Treatment of common congenital hand conditions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(3):121e–33e.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ogino T, Ishii S, Takahata S, Kato H. Long-term results of surgical treatment of thumb polydactyly. J Hand Surg Am. 1996;21(3):478–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wassel HD. The results of surgery for polydactyly of the thumb. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1969;64:175–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zuidam JM, Selles RW, Ananta M, Runia J, Hovius SE. A classification system of radial polydactyly: inclusion of triphalangeal thumb and triplication. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(3):373–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

Michael H. Johnson, MD declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Roshan T. Melvani, BLA declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Neil N. Patel, BLA declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Christine J. Cheng, MD, MPH declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Richard L. Hutchison, MD declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Statement of Human and Animal Rights

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of our Institutional Review Board and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.

Statement of Informed Consent

No patient identifiers being used; the IRB decided that informed consent was needed. No informed consent was obtained per IRB guidelines.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard L. Hutchison.

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, M.H., Melvani, R.T., Patel, N.N. et al. Radiographic indicators of a shared epiphysis in radial polydactyly. HAND 9, 329–334 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-013-9593-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-013-9593-7

Keywords

Navigation