Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comprehensive Performance Analysis of Student Retention Outcomes in a Higher Education Institution

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Undergraduate student retention is considered a critical issue in higher education, due to its impact on student success, degree completion, and the financial health of universities (Cataldi et al., 2018; Cornelius & Cavanaugh, 2016; Hermes, Community College Journal, 82(4), 26, 2012; Tinto, NACADA Journal, 19(2), 5-9, 1999). Higher education leaders have recognized the impact of this issue on student success, which warrants an analysis of the factors that influence student retention, and rationale for possible solutions. The purpose of this article is to present the application of the Human Performance Technology (HPT) model to address these institutional concerns in a higher education setting. This article focuses specifically on the performance analysis phase of the model, including the organizational analysis, environmental analysis, gap analysis, and cause analysis stages, and its implications for intervention design, evaluation, and change management in this organizational setting. We discuss the practical application of the HPT model as a valuable process of analysis and solution exploration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25(4), 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, N. M., Liu, X., & Horissian, K. (2022). Impact of community experiences on student retention perceptions and satisfaction in higher education. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 24(2), 337–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025120916433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brethower, D. M., & Dams, P. C. (1999). Systems thinking (and Systems Doing). Performance Improvement, 38(1), 37–52. Retrieved July 8, 2022, from https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.uwf.edu/10.1002/pfi.4140380109

  • Cataldi, E. F., Bennett, C. T., & Chen, X. (2018). First-generation students: College access, persistence, and postbachelor's outcomes. Stats in Brief. NCES 2018–421. National Center for Education Statistics. (ED580935). ERIC. Retrieved September 8, 2020, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED580935.pdf

  • Chyung, S. Y. (2005). Human performance technology from Taylor’s scientific management to Gilbert’s behavior engineering model. Performance Improvement, 44(1), 23–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius, L. M., & Cavanaugh, T. W. (2016). Grading the metrics: Performance-based funding in the Florida State University System. Journal of Education Finance, 42(2),153–187. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44162580

  • Dessinger, J. C., Moseley, J. L., & Van Tiem, D. M. (2012). Performance improvement/HPT model: Guiding the process. Performance Improvement, 51(3), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.20251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doggett, A. M. (2005). Root cause analysis: A framework for tool selection. Quality Management Journal, 12(4), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2005.11919269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, V. (2018). Thinking about the coding process in qualitative data analysis. The Qualitative Report, 23(11), 2850–2861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredman, J. (2020). States continue to throw support behind performance-based funding. National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators. Retrieved August 11, 2022, from https://www.nasfaa.org/news-item/21137/States_Continue_to_Throw_Support_Behind_Performance-Based_Funding

  • Guerra-López, I. (2018). Ensuring measurable strategic alignment to external clients and society. Performance Improvement, 57(6), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerra-López, I., & Hicks, K. (2017). Partner for performance: Strategically aligning learning and development. The Association for Talent Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermes, J. (2012). States trend toward performance funding. Community College Journal, 82(4), 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez, L. (2020). An exploration of strategic alignment in higher education. (Publication No. 27549304) [Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.

  • Kalsbeek, D. H. (Ed.). (2013). Reframing Retention Strategy for Institutional Improvement: New Directions for Higher Education, Number 161. Wiley.

  • Langdon, D. G., & Whiteside, K. S. (1997). The performance technologist’s role in interventions: An interview with Joe Harless. Performance Improvement, 36(10), 36–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liliana, L. (2016). A new model of Ishikawa diagram for quality assessment. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (vol. 161, no. 1, p. 012099). IOP Publishing.

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1982). Establishing dependability and confirmability in naturalistic inquiry through an audit. (ED216019). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED216019.pdf

  • Marker, A. (2007). Synchronized analysis model: Linking Gilbert’s behavior engineering model with environmental analysis models. Performance Improvement, 46(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGoldrick, B. (2015). Blending front-end analysis. In Human Performance Technology: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 344–383). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8356-1.ch046

  • Milem, J. F., & Berger, J. B. (1997). A modified model of college student persistence: Exploring the relationship between Astin’s theory of involvement and Tinto’s theory of student departure. Journal of College Student Development, 38(4), 387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musselman, K. M. (2019). Investigating the improvement of retention and graduation rates in Florida’s state university system institutions under the performance based funding Model (Doctoral dissertation, Florida Gulf Coast University).

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1980). Predicting freshman persistence and voluntary dropout decisions from a theoretical model. The Journal of Higher Education, 51(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1980.11780030

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research. Volume 2. Jossey-Bass, An Imprint of Wiley. 10475 Crosspoint Blvd, Indianapolis, IN 46256.

  • Pemberton, A., Hoskins, J., & Boninti, C. (2011). Minding the gap: Identifying performance issues using the human performance technology model. Reference Services Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907321111135457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pershing, J. A. (2006). Handbook of human performance technology: Principles, practices, and potential. Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabovsky, T. (2012). Accountability in higher education: Exploring impacts on state budgets and institutional spending patterns. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 675–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, D. E. (2016). Joe Harless, Ed. D.: An ounce of analysis. Performance Improvement, 55(6), 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. J. (1996). Human performance technology: Foundations for human performance improvement. In W. J. Rothwell (Ed.), ASTD models for human performance improvement: Roles, competencies and outputs (pp. 5–10). American Society for Training & Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, W.J., Hohne, C.K., & King, S.B. (2018). Human Performance Improvement: Building practitioner performance (vol. 3rd ed.). Routledge.

  • Rothwell, W. (2005). Beyond training and development: The groundbreaking classic on human performance enhancement (2nd ed.). Amacom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruffalo Noel-Levitz. (2019). 2019 Effective practices for student success, retention, and completion report. Retrieved June 13, 2021, from: https://learn.ruffalonl.com/rs/395-EOG977/images/2019%20Retention%20Practices%20Poll_RNL-002.pdf

  • Senge, P. M., & Sterman, J. D. (1992). Systems thinking and organizational learning: Acting locally and thinking globally in the organization of the future. European Journal of Operational Research, 59(1), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(92)90011-W

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sondergard, S. (2019). The Art of Leadership & Organizational Transformation: A guide to significant cultural & performance improvement via leadership. Yorkshire Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543045001089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1999). Taking retention seriously: Rethinking the first year of college. NACADA Journal, 19(2), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.12930/027195171925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Tiem, D., Moseley, J. L., & Dessinger, J. C. (2012). Fundamentals of performance improvement: Optimizing results through people, process, and organizations (3rd ed.). Pfeiffer.

  • Walter, J., Kellermanns, F. W., Floyd, S. W., Veiga, J. F., & Matherne, C. (2013). Strategic alignment: A missing link in the relationship between strategic consensus and organizational performance. Strategic Organization, 11(3), 304–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, R., Meiers, M. W., & Visser, Y. (2012). A guide to assessing needs: Essential tools for collecting information, making decisions, and achieving development results. World Bank Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Young‐Jones, A. D., Burt, T. D., Dixon, S., & Hawthorne, M. J. (2013). Academic advising: Does it really impact student success?. Quality Assurance in Education, 21(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881311293034

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of West Florida, Pensacola, FL, USA

    Lauren Adlof, Minkyoung Kim & William Crawley

Authors
  1. Lauren Adlof
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Minkyoung Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. William Crawley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren Adlof.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adlof, L., Kim, M. & Crawley, W. Comprehensive Performance Analysis of Student Retention Outcomes in a Higher Education Institution. TechTrends 67, 42–53 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00771-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00771-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation