Skip to main content
Log in

Development of new descriptor for melanoma detection on dermoscopic images

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Early detection of melanoma has critical importance for the success of the treatment. However, a successful early diagnosis is only possible with the existence of discriminative features. In this study, a new descriptor based on the number of colors was developed in order to successfully diagnose lesions of melanoma. The number of colors is the main feature in the identification of melanoma-type skin lesions. The user must select a threshold value when calculating the number of colors of the lesion. The incorrect threshold value selection of non-expert users disrupts the aforementioned feature and also leads to significant diagnostic errors. In this study, it was revealed that color counting threshold values have a significant effect on the distinctiveness of the number of colors. In the three dermoscopic databases, color counting threshold values that provide the maximum distinctiveness on melanoma and benign lesions were determined as 0 and 0.123 respectively. By using these color counting threshold values, the number of colors for each sample in the data sets was calculated separately. Following that, a novel attribute called the number of color difference was defined as a function of color counting threshold values. Experiments using only the proposed new descriptor yielded 52.7% higher f-measure and 84.5% higher true-positive performance than the number of colors used in the literature. The results obtained in this study revealed the importance of accurately determining the number of colors the lesions had and states that the applied color counting threshold significantly influences the classification results. Thereby, a new method is proposed for determining the critical color counting threshold. We claim that the classical ABCD rule should be improved by our new descriptor.

Fig. 1 Selection of threshold has vital effect on skin lesion classification. A new method to select the correct threshold value and a new attribute for correct classification were developed

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scioll B, Delachartre P, Cowell L et al (2017) Improved boundary segmentation of skin lesions in high-frequency 3D ultrasound. Comput Biol Med 87:302–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.06.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Davidson NE, Armstrong SA, Coussens LM, Cruz-Correa MR, DeBerardinis RJ, Doroshow JH, Foti M, Hwu P, Kensler TW, Morrow M et al (2016) Aacr cancer progress report 2016. Clin Cancer Res 22:S1–S137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tajeddin NZ, Asl BM (2018) Melanoma recognition in dermoscopy images using lesion’s peripheral region information. Comp Methods Program Biomed 163:143–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Garnavi R, Aldeen M, Celebi ME et al (2010) Automatic segmentation of dermoscopy images using histogram thresholding on optimal color channels. Int J Med Med Sci 1(2):126–134

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ciecholewski M (2017) Malignant and benign mass segmentation in mammograms using active contour methods. Symmetry 9:277. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9110277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Abbas Q, Fondón I, Rashid M (2011) Unsupervised skin lesions border detection via two-dimensional image analysis. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 104:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sirakov NM, Ushkala K (2009) An integral active contour model for convex hull and boundary extraction. In: Bebis G et al (eds) Lecture notes in computer science. ISVC’2009, vol 5876. Springer, Verlag, pp 1031–1040

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sirakov NM (2006) A new active convex hull model for image regions. J Math Imaging Vis 26(3):309–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mete M, Sirakov NM (2012) Dermoscopic diagnosis of melanoma in a 4D space constructed by active contour extracted features. Comput Med Imaging Graph 36:572–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sirakov NM, Ou YL, Mete M (2015) Skin lesion feature vectors classification in models of a Riemannian manifold. Ann Math Artif Intell 75:217–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-014-9424-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Menzies S, Ingvar C et al (1996) Frequency and morphologic characteristics of invasive melanomas lacking specific surface microscopic features. Arch Dermatol 132:1178–1182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bakheet S, An SVM (2017) Framework for malignant melanoma detection based on optimized HOG features. MDPI Comput 5(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/computation5010004

  13. Alquran H, Qasmieh IA et al (2017) The melanoma skin cancer detection and classification using support vector machine. IEEE AEECT

  14. Nachbar F, Stolz W, Merkle T et al (1994) The ABCD rule of dermatoscopy: high prospective value in the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions. J A Acad Dermatol 30–4:551–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dalila F.,Zohra A., Reda K., Hocaine C. (2017) Segmentation and classification of melanoma and benign skin lesions. Optik 140:749–761. 1016/j.ijleo.2017.04.084

  16. Faziloglu Y, Stanley RJ, Moss RH et al (2003) Colour histogram analysis for melanoma discrimination in clinical images. Skin Res Technol:147–155

  17. Marghoob AA, Malvehy J (2012) Atlas of dermoscopy 2edn, Informa Healthcare

  18. Russo T, Piccolo V et al (2016) Review-recent advances in dermoscopy. F1000Research 5(F1000 Faculty Rev.):184. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7597.1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Abbadi NKE, Faisal Z (2017) Detection and analysis of skin cancer from skin lesions. Int J Appl Eng Res 12(19):9046–9052

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gautam D, Ahmed M, Meena YK, Haq AU (2018) Machine learning–based diagnosis of melanoma using macro images. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 34(5):e2953. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.2953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. R.C.Gonzalez, R.E. Woods (2008) Digital image processing, 3rd edn., Pearson Prentice Hall

  22. Argenziano G, Soyer HP, De Giorgi V et al (2000) Interactive atlas of dermoscopy. Edra Medical Publishing and New Media, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  23. Inza I, Larranaga P, Blanco R (2004) Filter versus wrapper gene selection approaches in DNA microarray domains. Artif Intell Med Cilt-31:91–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. International Skin Imaging Collaboration. Web site. www.isic-archive.com. Accessed 12 March 2019

  25. Mete M, Sirakov NM (2010) Lesion detection in demoscopy images with novel density-based and active contour approaches. BMC Bioinform 11(Suppl6):23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-S6-S23 [ISSN: 1471–2105, 10.07.2010]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sirakov NM, Mete M, Chakrader NS (2011) Automatic boundary detection and symmetry calculation in dermoscopy images of skin lesions. In: IEEE ICIP2011, p. 1637–40. [ISBN: 978–1–4577-1302-6, IEEE Xplore]

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hasan Akan.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akan, H., Yıldız, M.Z. Development of new descriptor for melanoma detection on dermoscopic images. Med Biol Eng Comput 58, 2711–2723 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-020-02248-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-020-02248-z

Keywords

Navigation