Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Leisure Consumption and well-Being among Older Adults: Does Age or Life Situation Matter?

  • Published:
Applied Research in Quality of Life Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the associations between leisure consumption and well-being in older adults (50–74 years old). To find out whether these associations are age-specific, they were compared with the associations observed among younger adults (18–49 years old). Differences between the older adults by age and life situation were also examined. This study was based on the “Finland 2014 – Consumption and Life style” survey (N = 1351), conducted among a representative sample of the Finnish adult population. Well-being was measured as mental, economic and physical well-being. Objects of leisure consumption were grouped by factor analysis, and the associations between the resulting leisure consumption factors and the dimensions of well-being were studied using regression analysis. In addition, interaction terms were used to compare differences in the associations between younger and older adults, and among older adults varying in their life situation. In the older adults, appearance was related to better mental well-being, literature & culture to better economic well-being, and exercise to better physical well-being. Travel was linked positively to all the dimensions of well-being, and health care negatively to mental and physical well-being. Some differences in the associations were observed between the younger and older adults; for example, exercise but not appearance was associated with better emotional well-being among the younger adults. In general, the associations were stronger in the older than younger adults. Among the older adults, age, employment status, and marital status moderated some associations. Further research, especially with longitudinal data, is needed to clarify the causal relationships between leisure consumption and well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, K. B., Leibbrandt, S., & Moon, H. (2011). A critical review of the literature on social and leisure activity and wellbeing in later life. Ageing and Society, 31(04), 683–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aro, R., & Wilska, T.-A. (2014). Standard of living, consumption norms, and perceived necessities. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 34(9), 710–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brajša-Žganec, A., Merkaš, M., & Šverko, I. (2011). Quality of life and leisure activities: How do leisure activities contribute to subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research, 102(1), 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., MacDonald, R., & Mitchell, R. (2015). Are people who participate in cultural activities more satisfied with life? Social Indicators Research, 122(1), 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2004). The Disneyization of Society. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capio, C., Sit, C. P., & Abernethy, B. (2014). Physical well-being. In A. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 4805–4807). Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously. A theory of socioemotional selectivity. The American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christoph, B. (2010). The relation between life satisfaction and the material situation: A re-evaluation using alternative measures. Social Indicators Research, 98(3), 475–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, J. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLeire, T., & Kalil, A. (2010). Does consumption buy happiness? evidence from the United States. International Review of Economics, 57(2), 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (2006). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1(2), 151–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, R., Daly, A. P., Huyton, J., & Sanders, L. D. (2012). The challenge of defining wellbeing. International Journal of Well-being, 2(3), 222–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, E. W., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2011). If money doesn’t make you happy, then you probably aren’t spending it right. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(2), 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (2002). Rich and poor: Disparities, perceptions, concomitants. In W. Glatzer (Ed.), (pp. 157–175). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

  • Elliot, A. J., Mooney, C. J., Douthit, K. Z., & Lynch, M. F. (2014). Predictors of older adults’ technology use and its relationship to depressive symptoms and well-being. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69B(5), 667–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, I., Undén, A., & Elofsson, S. (2001). Self-rated health. comparisons between three different measures. results from a population study. International Journal of Epidemiology, 30(2), 326–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, A. C. (2015). Consumer expenditures vary by age. Beyond the Numbers: Prices & Spending, 4(14) Washington: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistic.

  • Galan, I., Meseguer, C. M., Herruzo, R., & Rodriguez-Artalejo, F. (2010). Self-rated health according to amount, intensity and duration of leisure time physical activity. Preventive Medicine, 51(5), 378–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouveia, V. V., Vione, K. C., Milfont, T. L., & Fischer, R. (2015). Patterns of value change during the life span: Some evidence from a functional approach to values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(9), 1276–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagger-Johnson, G. (2014). Introduction to research methods and data analysis in the health sciences. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halleröd, B., & Seldén, D. (2013). The multi-dimensional characteristics of wellbeing: How different aspects of wellbeing interact and do not interact with each other. Social Indicators Research, 113(3), 807–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halleröd, B., Larsson, D., Gordon, D., & Ritakallio, V. (2006). Relative deprivation: A comparative analysis of Britain, Finland and Sweden. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(4), 328–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, K. (2009). Low-income families: Experiences and responses to consumer exclusion. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 29(9), 543–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B., Muffels, R., & Wooden, M. (2008). Money does not buy happiness: Or does it? A reassessment based on the combined effects of wealth, income and consumption. Social Indicators Research, 87(1), 65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hietalahti, M., Rantanen, J., & Kokko, K. (2016). Do life goals mediate the link between personality traits and mental well-being? The Journal of Happiness & Well-being, 4, 72–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudders, L., & Pandelaere, M. (2012). The silver lining of materialism: The impact of luxury consumption on subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(3), 411–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBM Corp (2013). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idler, E. L., & Benyamini, Y. (1997). Self-rated health and mortality: A review of twenty-seven community studies. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38(1), 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joo, S. (2008). Personal financial wellness. In J. J. Xiao (Ed.), Handbook of consumer finance research (pp. 21–34). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Katz-Gerro, T. (2004). Cultural consumption research: review of methodology, theory, and consequence. International Review of Sociology, 14(1), 11–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koivula, A., Räsänen, P., & Sarpila, O. (2015). Working papers in economic sociology: Suomi 2014 – kulutus ja elämäntapa: Tutkimusseloste ja aineistojen 1999–2014 vertailua. Turku: University of Turku.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, K., Tolvanen, A., & Pulkkinen, L. (2013). Associations between personality traits and psychological well-being across time in middle adulthood. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 748–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuykendall, L., Tay, L., & Ng, V. (2015). Leisure engagement and subjective well-being: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141(2), 364–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Roux, B., Rouanet, H., Savage, M., & Warde, A. (2008). Class and cultural division in the UK. Sociology, 42(6), 1049–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leadbetter, C., & O′Connor, N. (2013). Healthy attendance? The impact of cultural engagement and sports participation on health and satisfaction with life in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Government Social Research. ISBN: 978–1–78256-790-5

  • Lee, J. H., Lee, J. H., & Park, S. H. (2014). Leisure activity participation as predictor of quality of life in Korean urban-dwelling elderly. Occupational Therapy International, 21(3), 124–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, S. (1998). Consumerism - as a way of life. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moschis, G. P. (2012). Consumer behavior in later life: current knowledge, issues, and new directions for research. Psychology and Marketing, 29(2), 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2009). Special focus: Measuring leisure in OECD countries. Society at a Glance 2009: OECD Social Indicators Paris: OECD pp 19-49

  • Official Statistics of Finland (2012). Households’ consumption [e-publication]. Statistics Finland: Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Official Statistics of Finland. (2011). Time use survey [e-publication]. Changes 1979–2009. Helsinki: Statistics Finland.

  • Penedo, F. J., & Dahn, J. R. (2005). Exercise and well-being: A review of mental and physical health benefits associated with physical activity. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 18(2), 189–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G. (2010). Enchanting a Disenchanted World: Continuity and Change in the Cathedrals of Consumption (3rd ed.). New York: SAGE Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robards, J., Evandrou, M., Falkingham, J., & Vlachantoni, A. (2012). Marital status, health and mortality. Maturitas, 73(4), 295–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassatelli, R. (2007). Consumer culture: history, theory and politics. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (2012). Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1–20.

  • Schwartz, S. H. (2006). Basic human values: theory, measurement, and applications. Revue Française De. Sociologie, 47(4), 249–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, B., & Podoshen, J. S. (2013). An examination of materialism, conspicuous consumption and gender differences. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(2), 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sewo Sampaio, P. Y., Ito, E., & Sampaio, R. A. C. (2013). The association of activity and participation with quality of life between Japanese older adults living in rural and urban areas. Journal of Clinical Gerontology and Geriatrics, 4(2), 51–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 482–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith Maguire, J. (2008). Fit for consumption: sociology and the business of fitness. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. P. (2009). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. 5th ed. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (pp. 325–394). Hillsdale, NJ: Routledge.

  • Taylor, L. (2002). From ways of life to lifestyle: the `Ordinari-ization’of British gardening lifestyle television. European Journal of Communication, 17(4), 479–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toepoel, V. (2013). Ageing, leisure, and social connectedness: how could leisure help reduce social isolation of older people? Social Indicators Research, 113(1), 355–372.

  • Valkeneers, G., & Vanhoomissen, T. (2012). Generations living their own life: The differences in lifestyle and consumer behaviour between busters and baby boomers. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 11(1), 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Boven, L., & Gilovich, T. (2003). To do or to have? that is the question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1193–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R., & Ehrhardt, J. (1995). The cross-national pattern of happiness: Test of predictions implied in three theories of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 34(1), 33–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F., DesMeules, M., Luo, W., Dai, S., Lagace, C., & Morrison, H. (2011). Leisure-time physical activity and marital status in relation to depression between men and women: A prospective study. Health Psychology: Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 30(2), 204–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheaton, B. (2010). Introducing the consumption and representation of lifestyle sports. Sport in. Society, 13(7–8), 1057–1081.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windsor, T. D., & Anstey, K. J. (2010). Age differences in psychosocial predictors of positive and negative affect: A longitudinal investigation of young, midlife, and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 25(3), 641–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S., Wang, R., Zhao, Y., Ma, X., Wu, M., Yan, X., & He, J. (2013). The relationship between self-rated health and objective health status: A population-based study. BMC Public Health, 13(320), 2458–13-320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, C., Cole, C. A., & Lee, M. P. (2009). Consumer decision making and aging: Current knowledge and future directions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(1), 2–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank staff at the Unit of Economic Sociology at the University of Turku, Finland, for the data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gerontology Research Center and Department of Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, PO Box 35, 40014, Jyväskylä, Finland

    Tiia Kekäläinen & Katja Kokko

  2. Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of Jyväskylä, PO Box 35, 40014, Jyväskylä, Finland

    Terhi-Anna Wilska

Authors
  1. Tiia Kekäläinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Terhi-Anna Wilska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Katja Kokko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tiia Kekäläinen.

Ethics declarations

Funding

The research was carried out with financial support from Tekes – the Finnish Funding Agency for Innovation. Project number: 2826/31/2014.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Human Participants

The data for this study were collected by a mail survey. All participants received information about use of the data by covering letter and participated voluntarily in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kekäläinen, T., Wilska, TA. & Kokko, K. Leisure Consumption and well-Being among Older Adults: Does Age or Life Situation Matter?. Applied Research Quality Life 12, 671–691 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-016-9483-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-016-9483-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation