Skip to main content
Log in

A carbon efficiency upgrading method for mechanical machining based on scheduling optimization strategy

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Low-carbon manufacturing (LCM) is increasingly being regarded as a new sustainable manufacturing model of carbon emission reduction in the manufacturing industry. In this paper, a two-stage low-carbon scheduling optimization method of job shop is presented as part of the efforts to implement LCM, which also aims to reduce the processing cost and improve the efficiency of a mechanical machining process. In the first stage, a task assignment optimization model is proposed to optimize carbon emissions without jeopardizing the processing efficiency and the profit of a machining process. Non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II and technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution are then adopted to assign the most suitable batch task of different parts to each machine. In the second stage, a processing route optimization model is established to plan the processing sequence of different parts for each machine. Finally, niche genetic algorithm is utilized to minimize the makespan. A case study on the fabrication of four typical parts of a machine tool is demonstrated to validate the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Department of Energy Statistics National Bureau of Statistics People’s Republic of China. China Energy Statistical Yearbook 2016. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2016 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ma F, Zhang H, Hon K K B, et al. An optimization approach of selective laser sintering considering energy consumption and material cost. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 199: 529–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu Y, Liu X, Zhao J. Research on job-shop scheduling optimization method with limited resources. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2008, 38(3–4): 386–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tang D, Dai M, Salido M A, et al. Energy-efficient dynamic scheduling for a flexible flow shop using an improved particle swarm optimization. Computers in Industry, 2016, 81: 82–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mouzon G C, Yildirim M B. A framework to minimise total energy consumption and total tardiness on a single machine. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 2008, 1(2): 105–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mouzon G C. Operational methods and models for minimization of energy consumption in a manufacturing environment. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Wichita: Wichita State University, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  7. Giglio D, Paolucci M, Roshani A. Integrated lot sizing and energy-efficient job shop scheduling problem in manufacturing/remanu-facturing systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 148: 624–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Salido M A, Escamilla J, Barber F, et al. Energy efficiency, robustness, and makespan optimality in job-shop scheduling problems. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 2016, 30(3): 300–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li L L, Li C B, Li L, et al. An integrated approach for remanufacturing job shop scheduling with routing alternatives. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering: MBE, 2019, 16(4): 2063–2085

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Piroozfard H, Wong K Y, Wong W P. Minimizing total carbon footprint and total late work criterion in flexible job shop scheduling by using an improved multi-objective genetic algorithm. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2018, 128: 267–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang C, Gu P, Jiang P. Low-carbon scheduling and estimating for a flexible job shop based on carbon footprint and carbon efficiency of multi-job processing. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part B, Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2015, 229(2): 328–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang Y, Liu Q, Zhou Y, et al. Integrated optimization of cutting parameters and scheduling for reducing carbon emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 149: 886–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lei D. Novel teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm for low carbon scheduling of flexible job shop. Control and Decision, 2017, 32(9): 1621–1627 (in Chinese)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou G, Tian C, Zhang J, et al. Multi-objective process route optimization considering carbon emissions. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2018, 96(1–4): 1195–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Verfaillie H A, Bidwell R. Measuring eco-efficiency: A guide to reporting company performance. World Business Council for Sustainable Development, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cao H, Li H, Cheng H, et al. A carbon efficiency approach for life-cycle carbon emission characteristics of machine tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2012, 37: 19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jiang Z, Ding Z, Zhang H, et al. Data-driven ecological performance evaluation for remanufacturing process. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 198: 111844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhu S, Jiang Z, Zhang H, et al. A carbon efficiency evaluation method for manufacturing process chain decision-making. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 148: 665–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li C, Tang Y, Cui L, et al. A quantitative approach to analyze carbon emissions of CNC-based machining systems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2015, 26(5): 911–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Deb K, Agrawal S, Pratap A, et al. A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. In: Schoenauer M, Deb K, Rudolph G, et al., eds. Parallel Problem Solving from Nature PPSN VI. PPSN 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1917. Berlin: Springer, 2000, 849–858

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mirjalili S. Genetic algorithm. In: Mirjalili S, ed. Evolutionary Algorithms and Neural Networks. Cham: Springer, 2019, 43–55

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Ma F, Zhang H, Gong Q, et al. A novel energy evaluation approach of machining processes based on data analysis. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 2019 (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ding Z, Jiang Z, Zhang H, et al. An integrated decision-making method for selecting machine tool guideways considering remanufacturability. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 2018 (in press)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work described in this paper was supported by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2018M642935), the Plateau Disciplines in Shanghai, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51905392, 51775392 and 51675388). These financial contributions are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuo Zhu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, S., Zhang, H., Jiang, Z. et al. A carbon efficiency upgrading method for mechanical machining based on scheduling optimization strategy. Front. Mech. Eng. 15, 338–350 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-019-0572-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-019-0572-8

Keywords

Navigation