Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal location of interline power flow controller for controlling multi transmission line: A new integrated technique

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Abstract

In this paper, an interline power flow controller (IPFC) is used for controlling multi transmission lines. However, the optimal placement of IPFC in the transmission line is a major problem. Thus, we use a combination of tabu search (TS) algorithm and artificial neural network (ANN) in the proposed method to find out the best placement locations for IPFC in a given multi transmission line system. TS algorithm is an optimization algorithm and we use it in the proposed method to determine the optimum bus combination using line data. Then, using the optimum bus combination, the neural network is trained to find out the best placement locations for IPFC. Finally, IPFC is connected at the best locations indicated by the neural network. Furthermore, using Newton-Raphson load flow algorithm, the transmission line loss of the IPFC connected bus is analyzed. The proposed methodology is implemented in MATLAB working platform and tested on the IEEE-14 bus system. The output is compared with the genetic algorithm (GA) and general load flow analysis. The results are validated with Levenberg-Marquardt back propagation and gradient descent with momentum network training algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Suresh Reddy S, Sarat Kumar S, Kumar S V J. Load flow solution for ill-conditioned power systems using Runge-Kutta and IWAMOTO methods with FACTS devices. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 2009, 5(6): 693–703

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ashokkumar R, Aravindhababu P. An improved power flow technique for distribution systems. Journal of Computer Science, Informatics & Electrical Engineering, 2009, 3(1): 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  3. Porate K, Thakre K L, Bodhe G L. Voltage stability enhancement of low voltage radial distribution network using static VAR compensator: A case study. WSEAS Transactions on Power Systems, 2009, 4(1): 32–41

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ghosh S. A new technique for load-flow analysis of radial distribution networks. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2009, 1(1): 75–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gopala Krishna Rao C V, Bapi Raju V, Ravindranath G. Fuzzy load modeling and load flow study using radial basis function (RBF). Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 2009, 5(4): 471–475

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shayeghi H, Shayanfar H A, Jalili A. LFC design of a deregulated power system with TCPS using PSO. International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 2009, 3(10): 632–640

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shimpi R J, Desale R P, Patil K S, Rajput J L, Chavan S B. Flexible AC transmission systems. International Journal of Computers and Applications, 2010, 1(15): 54–57

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bansal H O, Agrawal H P, Tiwana S, Singal A R, Shrivastava L. Optimal location of FACT devices to control reactive power. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2010, 2(6): 1556–1560

    Google Scholar 

  9. Singh B, Sharma N K, Tiwari A N. Prevention of voltage instability by using FACTS controllers in power systems: A literature survey. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2010, 2(5): 980–992

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kazemi A, Karimi E. The effect of an interline power flow controller (IPFC) on damping inter-area oscillations in interconnected power systems. Scientia Iranica, 2008, 15(2): 211–216

    Google Scholar 

  11. Saravana Kumar R, Prabhakar M. Power system stability enhancement using interline power flow controller. WSEAS Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 2004, 3(4): 909–911

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aali S, Nazarpour D. 48 — Pulse GTO center node unified power flow controller. European Journal of Scientific Research, 2010, 42(1): 106–113

    Google Scholar 

  13. Salem S, Sood V K. Simulation and controller design of an interline power flow controller in EMTP RV. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Power Systems Transients. 2007

  14. Jaya Christa S T, Venkatesh P. Optimal placement of unified power flow controllers: An approach to maximize the load ability of transmission lines. Journal of Electrical Systems, 2006, 2(2): 82–94

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chahkandi Nejad H, Jahani R, Habib Beigi E, Mohammadi A R. Hybrid genetic and PSO algorithm comparison and application of heuristic methods for unified power flow controllers optimal placement in power systems. American Journal of Scientific Research, 2011, (21): 12–19

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rajan C G C A. Neural based tabu search method for solving unit commitment problem with cooling-banking constraints. Serbian Journal of Electrical Engineering, 2009, 6(1): 57–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang Y K, Zhang Y, Chen C. A novel power injection model of IPFC for power flow analysis inclusive of practical constraints. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2006, 21(4): 1550–1556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sankar S, Ramareddy S. Simulation of closed loop controlled IPFC system. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 2007, 7(6): 245–249

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vinkovic A, Mihalic R. A current-based model of an IPFC for Newton-Raphson power flow. Electric Power Systems Research, 2009, 79(8): 1247–1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Usha Rani A P, Rama Reddy B S. Modeling and digital simulation of interline power flow controller system. International Journal of Computer and Electrical Engineering, 2010, 2(3): 441–446

    Google Scholar 

  21. Asad R, Kazemi A. A new approach for control of IPFC for power flow management. Leonardo Electronic Journal of Practices and Technologies, 2010, (16): 21–32

    Google Scholar 

  22. Naresh Babu A V, Sivanagaraju S, Padmanabharaju Ch, Ramana T. Multi-line power flow control using interline power flow controller (IPFC) in power transmission systems. International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 2010, 4(7): 492–496

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kahyaei A. Analysis of interline power flow controller (IPFC) location in power transmission systems. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 2011, 3(7): 633–639

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jilledi S K. Comparison of multi-line power flow control using unified power flow controller (UPFC) and interline power flow controller (IPFC) in power transmission systems. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2011, 3(4): 3229–3235

    Google Scholar 

  25. Karthik B, Chandrasekar S. A hybrid technique for controlling multi line transmission system using interline power flow controller. European Journal of Scientific Research, 2011, 58(1): 59–76

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Karthik.

About this article

Cite this article

Karthik, B., Alagarasan, I. & Chandrasekar, S. Optimal location of interline power flow controller for controlling multi transmission line: A new integrated technique. Front. Electr. Electron. Eng. 7, 447–458 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11460-012-0216-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11460-012-0216-9

Keywords

Navigation