Skip to main content
Log in

Progress in international geopolitical research from 1996 to 2015

  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Focusing on international relations from the perspective of geography, geopolitics exerts powerful influences on the course of economic and political development in the world. In the tide of globalization and information technology, geopolitics has become an important subject for global pattern interpretation and policy making. It is essentially important to have a scientific and systematic review on international geopolitics to promote its development. Based on the bibliometric statistics, the paper reviews the research development of geopolitics on the Web of Science from 1996 to 2015. The history, journals, papers and key research areas of geopolitics have been revealed in the paper. By the analysis of bibliometric statistics, the number of papers recently published in the journals of political geography and related geography journals continues to increase. The key areas of geopolitical papers which are globally highly cited include geopolitical interpretation of the countries and borders, critical geopolitics, emotional geopolitics, feminist geopolitics and other topics. Before the year of 2000, the state and borders were hot topics of the geopolitical research. Yet since 2000, it has been the trend that the geopolitics is increasingly set in the context of geographical implications. At the same time, critical geopolitics appears to be the main area of geopolitical research, especially transitioning from traditional geopolitics towards the humanism-embeddedness (such as emotional geopolitics, feminist geopolitics). The paper then systematically reviews the branch trends of geopolitical research, including the borders and the territory, global geo-culture and geo-economics, Chinese models of geopolitics, resource conflicts and ecological politics, as well as emotional geopolitics. Finally, it puts forward the implication that Chinese geopolitical studies should reinforce the importance of geographical space and scale, use the process of description and multiple methods, as well as integrate humanistic thoughts, in order to further enrich the theories and practices of geopolitical research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnew J, 1998. Geopolitics: Re-visioning World Politics. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnew J A, 2001. Disputing the nature of the international in political geography: The Hettner-Lecture in Human Geography. Geographische Zeitschrift, 89(1): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnew J, 2010. Emerging China and critical geopolitics: Between world politics and Chinese particularity. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 51(5): 569–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agnew J, Mitchell K, Toal G, et al., 2003. A Companion to Political Geography. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Akiner S, 2004. Geopolitics of hydrocarbons in Central and Western Asia. In: Akiner S (ed.). The Caspian: Politics, Energy and Security. London: Routledge Curzon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin A, Thrift N, 2005. What’s left? Just the future. Antipode, 37(2): 220–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker K, 1999. The politics of hydropower: Developing the Mekong. Political Geography, 18(2): 209–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barter P, 2006. Multiple dimensions in negotiating the cross-border transport links that connect and divide Singapore and Johor, Malaysia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 47(2): 287–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beier C, 1998. Dezentralisierung und Entwicklungs management in Indonesien. GeoJournal, 44(1): 92–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy A J, Williams P D, 2011. The new politics of protection? Cote d’Ivoire, Libya and the responsibility to protect. International Affairs, 87(4): 825–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiker R, Leet M, 2006. From the sublime to the subliminal: Fear, awe and wonder in international politics. Journal of International Studies, 34(3): 713–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brichieri-Colombi S, Bradnock R W, 2003. Geopolitics, water and development in South Asia: Cooperative development in the Ganges-Brahmaputra delta. The Geographical Journal, 169: 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunnell T, Muzaini H, Sidaway J D, 2006. Global city frontiers: Singapore’s hinterland and the contested socio-political geographies of Bintan, Indonesia. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(1): 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buursink J, 1996. Becoming Twin Citizens in Minneapolis and St Paul: A Case of Territorial Integration // Davies R J. Contemporary City Structuring. Society of South African Geographers. Cape Town: IGU Commission on Urban Development and Urban Life.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan W A, 2009. The cartography of national humiliation and the emergence of China’s geobody. Public Culture, 21(1): 141–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell D, 2007. Geopolitics and visuality: Sighting the Darfur conflict. Political Geography, 26(4): 357–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen S B, 1991. Presidential address: Global geopolitical change in the post-cold era. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 81(4): 551–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen S B, 2011. Geopolitics: The Geography of International Relations. 2nd ed. Shanghai: Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman M, 2007. Immigration geopolitics beyond the Mexico-US border. Antipode, 39(1): 54–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean K, 2005. Spaces and territorialities on the Sino-Burmese boundary: China, Burmna and the Kachin. Political Geography, 24(7): 808–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Debin, Duan Dezhong, Liu Chengliang, et al., 2015. Progress of geopolitics of Chinese geography since 1990. Geographical Research, 34(2): 199–212. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers N, Buursink J, 2000. Binational Cities: Peoples, Institutions, and Structures//M van der Velde, H van Houtum. Borders Regions and People. London: Pion, 182–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilenberg M, 2012. The confessions of a timber baron: patterns of patronage on the Indonesian-Malaysia border Identities. Global Studies in Culture and Power, 19(2): 149–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ek R, 2000. A revolution in military geopolitics? Political Geography, 19(7): 841–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feitelson E, 2002. Implications of shifts in the Israeli water discourse for Israeli-Palestinian water negotiations. Political Geography, 21(3): 293–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fluri J L, 2009. Geopolitics of gender and violence ‘from below’. Political Geography, 28(4): 259–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F, 1992. The End of History and the Last Man? New York: Free Press, 199–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassman J, 2005. On the borders of Southeast Asia: Cold War geography and the construction of the other. Political Geography, 24(7): 784–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grundy-Warr C, Peachey K, Perry M, 1999. Fragmented integration in the Singapore Indonesian border zone: Southeast Asia’s “growth triangle” against the global economy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(2): 304–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Zhiding, Cao Yuan, Liu Yuli, Ge Yuanjing, 2013. A new development of political geography research in China: Geo-setting. Human Geography, 133(5): 123–128. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu Zhiding, Lu Dadao, 2015. The re-interpretation of the classical geopolitical theories from a critical geopolitical perspective. Acta Geographica Sinica, 70(6): 851–863. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington S P, 1993. The clash of civilizations. Foreign Affairs, 72(3): 22–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington S P, 2010. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. Beijing: Xinhua Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyndman J, 2001. Towards a feminist geopolitics. Canadian Geographer, 45(2): 210–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyndman J, 2004. Mind the gap: Bridging feminist and political geography through geopolitics. Political Geography, 23(3): 307–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyndman J, 2007. Feminist geopolitics revisited: Body counts in Iraq. Professional Geographer, 59(1): 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R D, 2009. The revenge of geography. Foreign Policy, 5: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns G, 2010. Geography, geopolitics and Empire. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(2): 187–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keith R C, 2009. China from the Inside Out: Fitting the People’s Republic into the World. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy P, 1986. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuus M, 2004. Europe’s eastern expansion and the reinscription of otherness in East-Central Europe. Progress in Human Geography, 28(4): 472–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuus M, 2007. Intellectuals and geopolitics: The ‘cultural politicians’ of Central Europe. Geoforum, 38(2): 241–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee M, 2007. Inventing Fear of Crime: Criminology and the Politics of Anxiety. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilov A, 2007. The Dialogue of Civilizations: The World Geopolitical Trends. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Zhigao, Wang Chen, Li Erling et al., 2014. Research progress of economic geography in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(10): 1449–1458. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu Dadao, Du Debin, 2013. Some thoughts on the strengthening of geopolitical and geo-economic studies. Acta Geographica Sinica, 68(6): 723–727. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttwak E N, 1993. The coming global war for economic power: There are no nice guys on the battlefield of geoeconomics. The International Economy, 7(5): 18–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackinder H J, 1904. The geographical pivot of history. Geographical Journal, 23(4): 422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao Hanying, 2014. Geopolitical and geoeconomic situation in the surrounding areas and China’s strategies. Progress in Geography. 33(3): 289–302. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marktanner M, Salman L, 2011. Economic and geopolitical dimensions of renewable vs. nuclear energy in North Africa. Energy Policy, 39(8): 4479–4489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin P M, 2004. Contextualizing feminist political theory. In: Staeheli L, Kofman E, Peake L (ed.). Mapping Women, Making Politics: Feminist Perspectives on Political Geography. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Megoran N, 2006. For ethnography in political geography: Experiencing and re-imagining Ferghana Valley boundary closures. Political Geography, 25(6): 622–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moysey D, 2010. The Geopolitics of emotion. Beijing: Xinhua Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman D, Paasi A, 1998. Fences and neighbours in the postmodern world: Boundary narratives in political geography. Progress in Human Geography, 22(2): 186–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohmae K, 1995. China’s 600,000 Avon ladies. New Perspectives Quarterly, 21(1): 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pain R, 2009. Globalized fear? Towards an emotional geopolitics. Progress in Human Geography, 33(4): 466–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Painter J, 1995. Politics, Geography and Political Geography: A Critical Approach. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandian S G, 2005. Energy trade as a confidence-building measure between India and Pakistan: A study of the Indo-Iran trans-Pakistan pipeline project. Contemporary South Asia, 14(3): 307–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker G, 2003. Geopolitics: Past, Present and Future. Beijing: Xinhua Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkmann M, 2003. Cross-border regions in Europe: Significance and drivers of regional cross-border cooperation. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10(2): 153–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pile, S, 2010. Emotions and affect in recent human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographer, 35(1): 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pleshakov K, 1994. Geopolitika v svete globalnykh peremen. Mezhdounarodnaya zhizn, 10: 30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts S, Secor A, Sparke M, 2003. Neoliberal geopolitics. Antipode, 35(5): 886–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholte J A, 2000. Globalisation: A Critical Introduction. Houndmills: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholvin S, 2011. Clashing geopolitical visions: Iraq from the first world war to the 1958 revolution. Revista Română de Geografie Politică, 2: 157–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secor A, 2001. Toward a feminist counter-geopolitics: Gender, space and Islamist politics in Istanbul. Space and Polity, 5(3): 191–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen J F, 2014. Not quite a twin city: Cross-boundary integration in Hong Kong and Shenzhen. Habitat International, 42: 138–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Jianfa, 2013. Cross-boundary urban development and integration: A case study of Hong Kong and Shenzhen. City Planning Review, 37(6): 20–25. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shmueli D F, 1999. Water quality in international river basins. Political Geography, 18(4): 437–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidaway J D, 2000. Postcolonial geographies: An exploratory essay. Progress in Human Geography, 24(4): 591–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sit V F S, 1998. Hong Kong’s “transferred” industrialization and industrial geography. Asian Survey, 38(9): 880–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneddon C, Fox C, 2006. Rethinking transboundary waters: A critical hydropolitics of the Mekong basin. Political Geography, 25(2): 181–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder K A, 2008. Building democracy from below: A case from rural Tanzania. Journal of Modern African Studies, 46(2): 287–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solovyev E G, 2004. Geopolitics in Russia: Science or vocation? Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 37(1): 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song X, 2001. Building international relations theory with Chinese characteristics. Journal of Contemporary China, 10(26): 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparke M, 1998. A map that roared and an original atlas: Canada, cartography, and the narration of nation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88(3): 463–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparke M, 2008. From geopolitics to geoeconomics: Transnational state effects in the borderlands. Geopolitics, 3(2): 62–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor P J, Flint C, 2000. Political Geography: World-Economy, Nation-State and Locality. 4th ed. London: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuathail G O, 2010. Localizing geopolitics: Disaggregating violence and return in conflict regions. Political Geography, 29(5): 256–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuathail G O, 1998. Postmodern geopolitics? The modern geopolitical imagination and beyond. In: Tuathail G O, Dalby S. Rethinking Geopolitics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuathail G O, 1999. Understanding critical geopolitics: Geopolitics and risk society. In: Gray C S, Sloan G. Geopolitics, Geography and Strategy. London: Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher A D, 1997. Dams as Aid: A Political Anatomy of Nordic Development Thinking. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma S K, 2007. Energy geopolitics and Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline. Energy Policy, 35(6): 3280–3301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Enyong, 2003. Political Geography. Beijing: Higher Education Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Limao, Li Hongqiang, Gu Mengchen, 2012. Influence path and effect of climate change on geopolitical pattern. Acta Geographica Sinica, 67(6): 853–863. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Shufang, Ge Yuejing, Liu Yuli, 2015. The spatio-temporal evolution and driving mechanism of geopolitical influence of China and the US in South Asia. Acta Geographica Sinica, 70(6): 864–878. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Wentao, Liu yanhua, Yu Hongyuan, 2014. The geopolitical pattern of global climate change and energy security issues. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(9): 1259–1267. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • While A, Jonas A E G, Gibbs D, 2004. The environment and the entrepreneurial city: Searching for the urban ‘sustainability fix’ in Manchester and Leeds. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(3): 549–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Withers C W J, 2013. On enlightenment’s margins: Geography, imperialism and mapping in Central Asia, c.1798–c.1838. Journal of Historical Geography, 39: 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf A, 1999. Criteria for equitable allocations: The heart of international water conflict. Natural Resources Forum, 23: 23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward B, 2004. Plan of Attack. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tao Song.

Additional information

Foundation: National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41530634, No.41530751

Author: Song Tao (1983–), PhD, specialized in geopolitics and regional sustainable development.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, T., Lu, D., Liang, Y. et al. Progress in international geopolitical research from 1996 to 2015. J. Geogr. Sci. 27, 497–512 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-016-1389-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-016-1389-1

Keywords

Navigation