Abstract
The trend of fencing grassland as livestock paddocks is spreading on the Eurasian steppe, however, its impacts on grassland wildlife are little known. In order to explore such impacts, we carried out a field study on how grassland fencing impacts Przewalski’s gazelle (Procapra przewalskii), a species listed as EN (Endangered) by SSC/IUCN, on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. The results revealed that (1) in the fenced areas, daily movement distance of Przewalski’s gazelle was 5081±1187 m (Hudong-Ketu) and 4110±912 m (Yuanzhe), which was much shorter than the 7223±546 m recorded in an unfenced area (Kuaierma); (2) the feeding bout duration of Przewalski’s gazelle was much shorter in the fenced habitat; (3) the frequency of walking along both high or low fence lines reached about 81%; while the frequency of jumping across the low fence line was only about 1.2% and frequency of crawling through the bottom of the high fence lines was about 17.8%; (4) the size of post-fencing habitat decreased to about 20% and 6% of the sizes of pre-fencing habitat in Hudong-Ketu and Yuanzhe areas respectively, but no clear change in the size of habitat area was found in the unfenced Kuaierma area; and (5) the fence lines impaired the possibility of gazelles to escape from predators and occasionally trapped the Przewalski’s gazelle which failed to jump over the fence lines. Death occurrence of Przewalski’s gazelle in the intensively fenced area, including gazelles strangled by fence lines and predated by wolves, reached 5% of the population size in Yuanzhe and up to 15%–20% in Hudong-Ketu. This study highlights the negative impacts of grassland fencing on Przewalski’s gazelle and proposes measures for integrating conservation of this gazelle with livestock management practice.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Fahring L, Merriam G. Conservation of fragmented populations. Conser Biol, 1994, 8: 50–59
Saunder D A, Hobbs R J, Margules R. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation, a review. Conserv Biol, 1991, 5: 18–32
Li C, Jiang Z, Feng Z, et al. Effects of highway traffic on diurnal activity of the critically endangered Przewalski’s gazelle. Wildlife Res, 2009, 36: 379–385
Forman R T T, Alexander L E. Roads and their major ecological effects. Ann Rev Ecol Sys, 1998, 29: 207–231
Milner-Gulland E J, Lhagvasuren B. Population dynamics of the Mongolian gazelle Procapra gutturosa, an historical analysis. J Appl Ecol, 1998, 35: 240–251
State Development Planning Commission (SDPC). Report on the Population, Resources and Environment of China. Beijing: China Environmental Sciences Press, 1996. 74–77
State Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA). China Ecological and Environmental Situation Report 2002. Beijing: China Environmental Sciences Press, 2002. 12–14
Newman J L. Effects of woven wire fence with cattleguards on a free-living antelope population. Proc Antelope States Workshop, 1966, 2: 6–8
May M. Fencing for livestock management. Proc Biennial Antelope States Workshop, 1968. 3: 62–64
Gross B D, Holeches J L, Hallford D, et al. Effectiveness of antelope pass structures in restriction of livestock. J Range Manage, 1983, 36: 22–24
Dyer S J, O’Neill J P, Wasel S M, et al. Quantifying barrier effects of roads and seismic lines on movements of female woodland caribou in northeastern Alberta. Can J Zool, 2002, 80: 839–845
Poole D W, Western G, McKkillop I G. The effects of fence voltage and the type of conducting wire on the efficacy of an electric fence to exclude badgers (Meles meles). Crop Protection, 2004, 23: 27–33
Zhang R, Wang Z. Report on Mammals in Qinghai and Gansu Provinces. Beijing: Science Press, 1964
Jiang Z, Fen Z, Wang Z, et al. Historical and current distributions of Przewalski’s gazelle. Acta Theriol Sin, 1995, 15: 241–245
Jiang Z, Li D, Wang W. Population declines of Przewalski’s gazelle around Qinghai Lake, China. Oryx, 2000, 34: 129–135
Hu J, Jiang Z. Predicting the potential distribution of the endangered Przewalski’s gazelle. J Zool, 2010, 28: 54–63
Li Z, Jiang Z. Grouping behavioral differences in the sympatric Tibetan gazelle and Przewalski’s gazelle in the upper Buha River region. Zool Res, 2006, 27: 396–402
Jiang Z, Li D, Peng J, et al. Structure, elasticity and diversity of animal behaviour. Biodiversity Sci, 2001, 9: 265–274
Liu B, Jiang Z. Diet composition of wolf in the Qinghai Lake region in northeast Tibetan Plateau. Acta Theriol, 2002, 48: 255–263
Li D, Jiang Z, Wang W. Impacts of human activities on the distribution of the critically endangered Przewalski’s gazelle. Acta Ecol Sin, 1999, 19: 890–895
You Z, Jiang Z. Courtship and mating behaviors in Przewalski’s gazelle (Procapra przewalskii). Acta Zool Sin, 2005, 51: 187–194
Li C, Jiang Z, Ping X, et al. Current status and conservation of Przewalski’s gazelle Procapra przewalskii. Oryx, 2012, 46: 145–153
You Z, Jiang Z, Li C. Location of rut stands vs. mating opportunities in Przewalski’s gazelle: A field test of the “Resource-based hypothesis” and “Female traffic version of the hotspot hypothesis”. Curr Zool, 2011, 57: 701–708
Prejevalsky [Przewalski] N. Mongolia, the Tangut Country, and the Solitudes of Northern Tibet. London, Sampson, Low, Marston, Searle, and Rivington, 1876
Li D, Jiang Z. Population viability analysis for the Przewalski’s gazelle (Procapra przewalskii). Russian J Ecol, 2001, 33: 115–120
Schroeder M A, Robb L A. Fidelity of greater sage-grouse Centrocercus urophasianus to breeding areas in a fragmented landscape. Wildlife Biol, 2003, 9: 291–299
Takehiko Y I, Naoko M, Badamjav L, et al. Preliminary evidence of a barrier effect of a railroad on the migration of Mongolian gazelles. Conserv Biol, 2005, 19: 945–948
Lei R, Jiang Z. Phylogeography and genetic diversity of the critically endangered Przewalski’s gazelle. Anim Conserv, 2003, 6: 361–367
Fox J L, Kelsang D, Dorji T. Tibetan antelope Pantholops hodgsonii conservation and new rangeland management policies in the western Chang Tang Nature Reserve, Tibet: Is fencing creating an impasse? Oryx, 2009, 43: 183–190
Yang J, Jiang Z. Genetic diversity, population genetic structure and demographic history of Przewalski’s gazelle (Procapra przewalskii): Implications for conservation. Conserv Genetics, 2011, doi: 10.1007/s10592-011-0244-7
Yang J, Jiang Z, Zeng Y, et al. Effect of anthropogenic landscape features on population genetic differentiation of Przewalski’s gazelle: Main role of human settlement. PLoS One, 2011, 6: e20144
Goddard P J, Summers R W, Macdonald A J. Behavioral responses of red deer to fences of five different designs. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2001, 73: 289–298
Wang S, Li Y, Wang Y. Relationship between foraging areas of sheep (wether) and spatial heterogeneity of grassland landscape. Acta Ecol Sin, 1999, 19: 25–30
Hodgetts B V, Waas J R, Matthews L R. The effects of visual and auditory disturbance no the behavior of red deer (Cervus elaphus) at pasture with and without shelter. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 1998, 55: 337–351
Baines D, Andrew M. Marking of deer fences to reduce frequency of collisions by woodland grouse. Conserv Biol, 2003, 110: 169–176
Hu J, Jiang Z. Climate change hastens the conservation urgency of an endangered ungulate. PLoS One, 2011, 6: e22873
Mallon D P, Jiang Z. Grazers on the plains: Challenges and prospects for large herbivores in Central Asia. J Appl Ecol, 2009, 46: 516–519
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
You, Z., Jiang, Z., Li, C. et al. Impacts of grassland fence on the behavior and habitat area of the critically endangered Przewalski’s gazelle around the Qinghai Lake. Chin. Sci. Bull. 58, 2262–2268 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-013-5844-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-013-5844-9