Abstract
In order to expand the application range of the classic Topographic Index model (TOPMODEL) and develop a more appropriate submodel of hydrological processes for use in the land surface model, two types of TOPMODEL are investigated, one with saturated hydraulic conductivity change with depth obeying exponential law (classical e-TOPMODEL or e-TOPMODEL for short) and the other obeying general power law (general p-TOPMODEL or p-TOPMODEL for short). Using observation date in the Suomo River catchment located in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River, the sensitivity study of the p-TOPMODEL was conducted and the simulated results from the model were examined and evaluated first, and then the results were compared with the results from the e-TOPMODEL to find the similarities and differences between the two types of models. The main conclusions obtained from the above studies are (1) topographic index and its distribution derived from the p-TOPPMODEL for the Suomo Basin are sensitive to changes of parameter n and m; (2) changes of n and m have impacts on the simulation results of various hydrological components (such as daily runoff, monthly averaged runoff, monthly averaged surface runoff and subsurface runoff), but have the weaker impacts on forty-year averaged total runoff; and (3) for the same value of m, the simulated results of e-TOPMODEL display higher surface runoff and lower subsurface runoff than the general p-TOPMODEL does but multi-year averaged total runoffs produced from the two types of TOPMODEL show insignificant difference. The differences between the two types of models indicate that it is necessary to pay close attention to correct selection from different hydrological models for use in land surface model development. The result mentioned above is useful to provide some referential information for the model selection.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ambroise B, Beven K J, Freer J. 1996. Toward a generalization of the TOPMODEL concepts: Topographic indices of hydrological similarity. Water Resour Res, 32: 2135–2145
Beven K J. 2000. Rainfall-Runoff Modelling. New York: John Wiley & Sons, LTD. 360
Dickinson R E. 1986. Biosphere-atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) for the NCAR Community. Climate Model. Atmosphere Science. Technical Report. National Center for Atmospheric Research
Douville H. 2003. Assessing the influence of soil moisture on seasonal climate variability with AGCMs. J Hydrometeorol, 4: 1044–1066
Douville H. 2004. Relevance of soil moisture for seasonal atmospheric predictions. Clim Dyn, 22: 429–446
Duan J F, Miller N L. 1997. A generalized power function for the subsurface transmissivity profile in TOPMODEL. Water Resour Res, 333: 2559–2562
Gedney N, Cox P O. 2003. The sensitivity of global climate model simulations to the representation of soil moisture heterogeneity. J Hydrometeorol, 4: 1265–1275
Iorgulescu I, Musy A. 1997. Generalization of topmodel for a power law transmissivity profile. Hydrol Process, 11: 1353–1355
IPCC. 2001. Climate change 2001: The scientific Basis. Contribution of working group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 881
Koster R D, Suarez M J, Ducharne A. 2000. A catchment-based approach to modeling land surface processes in a general circulation model, I. Model structure. J Geophys Res, 105: 809–822
Koster R D. 2004. Regions of strong coupling between soil moisture and precipitation. Science, 305: 1138–1140
Niu G Y, Yang Z L. 2005. A simple TOPMODE-based runoff parameterization (SIMTOP) for use in global climate models. J Geophys Res, 110: 1–15
Reto S, Vidale P L, Boone A, et al. 2007. Impact of scale and aggregation on the terrestrial water exchange: Intregrating land surface models and Rhone catchment observations. J Hrdrometeor, 8: 1002–1015
Sellers P J, Mintz Y, Sud Y C, et al. 1986. A simple biosphere model (SiB) for use within general circulation models. J Atmos Sci, 43: 505–531
Seuffert G, Gross P, Simmer C, et al. 2002. The influence of hydrologic modeling on the predicted local weather: Two-way coupling of a mesoscale weather prediction model and a land surface hydrologic model. J Hydrometeorol, 3: 505–523
Sivapalan M, Beven K J, Wood E F. 1987. On hydrologic similarity. 2. A scaled method of storm runoff production. Water Resour Res, 23: 2266–2278
Stieglitz M, Rind D, Famiglieth J, et al. 1996. An efficient approach to modeling the topographic control of surface hydrology for regional and global climate modeling. J Clim, 10: 118–137
Sun S F, Deng H P. 2004. A Study of rainfall-runoff Response in a catchment using TOPMODEL. Adv Atmos Sci, 21: 87–95
Wang J, Endreny T A, Hassett J M. 2006. Power function decay of hydraulic conductivity for a TOPMODEL-based infiltration routine. Hydrol Process, 20: 3825–3834
Warrac K, Stieglitz M, Mengelkamp H T, et al. 2002. Advantages of a topographically controlled runoff simulation in a soil-vegetation-atmospheric transfer model. J Hydrometeorol, 3: 131–148
Yang C G, Lin Z H, Hao Z C, et al. 2007. Review of coupling atmospheric and hydrologic models (in Chinese). Adv Earth Sci, 22: 810–817
Yong B, Zhang W C, Liu C S. 2006. Advances in the coupling study of hydrological models and land surface models (in Chinese). J Glaciol Geocryol, 6: 961–970
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, S., Deng, H. & Wang, Q. Simulation and comparative study of two types of Topographic Index model for a homogeneous mountain catchment. Sci. China Earth Sci. 57, 2089–2099 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-014-4892-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-014-4892-6