Skip to main content
Log in

Sparring with technology: collaborating with coaches, mentors, and academic staff to develop culturally responsive computing education for a youth boxing program

  • Development Article
  • Published:
Educational technology research and development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the United States, culturally responsive computing is a framework that aims to support broadening the participation of racially and linguistically diverse children in computing and technology education through bottom-up interventions that are community-oriented, technology rich, and culturally dynamic. Despite the important role that youth sports play in many local neighborhoods and communities across demographic groups there is only a small amount of research on developing culturally responsive computing education that incorporates these activities. We report findings from a culturally responsive computing collaboration between computing education researchers and coaches, mentors, and academic staff who ran a youth boxing program that predominantly served African American children. The purpose of the collaboration was to learn about and represent the adults’ expertise and knowledge in the co-development of culturally responsive computing activities. Using an emergent mixed methods research design, we collected qualitative data (i.e., interviews and group discussions) and quantitative data (i.e., pre- and post-surveys) throughout the collaboration. We analyzed these data to study how coaches, mentors, and staff members brought their knowledge and expertise to bear on the co-development of culturally responsive computing activities for the youth boxing program. Our findings show how the coaches, mentors, and academic staff used their expertise and knowledge in ways that leveraged boxing culture to go beyond boxing itself in the co-development of the activities. In addition, even when connections between computing and boxing did not appear authentically motivated this did not negate the adults’ engagement with the culturally responsive computing project. These findings have implications for anti-deficit theorizing about authenticity and inauthenticity in the co-development of culturally responsive computing in youth sports contexts. The construction of authenticity in culturally responsive computing might be less understood as a direct translation from community into education and more so as a negotiation between locally defined demarcations of what is considered authentic and inauthentic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

To protect the privacy of the participants in this study, data cannot be openly accessed or shared.

References

  • Adeyemo, A. O. (2022). Place, race, and sports: Examining the beliefs and aspirations of motivated Black male students who play high school sports. Urban Education, 57(1), 154–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen Kuyenga, M., Lachney, M., & Green, B. (2022). Race-positive career and technical education: Techno-social agency beyond the vocational-liberal divide. Tech Trends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00806-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, A., Eglash, R., Lachney, M., & Babbitt, W. (2016). Design agency: Diversifying computer science at the intersections of creativity and culture. In M. Raisinghani (Ed.), Revolutionizing education through web-based instruction (pp. 35–56). IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2017). Mixed methods in educational research. In R. Coe, M. Waring, L. V. Hedges, & J. Arthur (Eds.), Research methods and methodologies in education (pp. 159–165). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjørndal, C. T., & Ronglan, L. T. (2021). Engaging with uncertainty in athlete development–orchestrating talent development through incremental leadership. Sport, Education and Society, 26(1), 104–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Sage.

  • Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, R., Richardson, D., Cope, E., & Cronin, C. (2020). Learning from the past; a Freirean analysis of FA coach education since 1967. Sport, Education and Society, 25(6), 681–697.

  • Chuang, H. H. (2016). Leveraging CRT awareness in creating web-based projects through use of online collaborative learning for pre-service teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 857–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, T., Greene, D. M., Beard, N., & Brunson, J. (2020). Data everyday: Data literacy practices in a Division I college sports context. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–13). ACM

  • Collins, H., Evans, R., & Higgins, C. (2016). Bad call: Technology’s attack on referees and umpires and how to fix it. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. N. (2016). Excellence beyond athletics: Best practices for enhancing Black male student athletes’ educational experiences and outcomes. Equity & Excellence in Education, 49(3), 267–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coopers, J. N. (2019). From exploitation back to empowerment: Black male holistic (under)development through sport and (mis)education. Peter Lang.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushion, C., & Denstone, G. (2011). Etienne Wenger: Coaching and communities of practice. In R. L. Jones, P. Potrac, C. Cushion, & L. R. Ronglan (Eds.), The sociology of sports coaching (pp. 94–107). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J., Lachney, M., Zatz, Z., Babbitt, W., & Eglash, R. (2019). A cultural computing curriculum. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 1171–1175).

  • Drazan, J. F., Cooke, L., & Eglash, R. (2016). Harmonious integration: Tuning STEM education with generative justice. In 2016 IEEE integrated STEM education conference (ISEC) (pp. 58–64). IEEE

  • Edwards, H. (2017). The revolt of the Black athlete. University of Illinois Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eglash, R. (1999). African fractals: Modern computing and indigenous design. Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eglash, R., Bennett, A., Cooke, L., Babbitt, W., & Lachney, M. (2021). Counter-hegemonic computing: Toward computer science education for value generation and emancipation. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 21(4), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eglash, R., Bennett, A., Drazan, J., Lachney, M., & Babbitt, W. (2017). A mathematical tool kit for generative justice. ETD-Educação Temática Digital, 19(3), 761–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eglash, R., Gilbert, J. E., & Foster, E. (2013). Toward culturally responsive computing education. Communications of the ACM, 56(7), 33–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eglash, R., Lachney, M., Babbitt, W., Bennett, A., Reinhardt, M., & Davis, J. (2020). Decolonizing education with Anishinaabe arcs: Generative STEM as a path to indigenous futurity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1569–1593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fields, A. (2015). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouché, R. (2012). Analog turns digital: Hip-hop, technology, and the maintenance of racial authenticity. In T. Pinch & K. Bijsterveld (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of sound studies (pp. 505–525). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouché, R. (2017). Game changer: The technoscientific revolution in sports. JHU Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gaskins, N. R. (2021). Techno-vernacular creativity & innovation: Culturally relevant making inside and outside of the classroom. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, J. D. (1993). Nonparametric statistics: An introduction. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goins, R., Koshy, S., Scott, A., Payton, F. Cobb, Lundgren, K., & Toldson, I. (2022). The state of tech diversity: The Black tech ecosystem. Retrieved from: https://www.kaporcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/KC22001_black-tech-report.final_.pdf?vgo_ee=aGegc5mQHw%2B1S%2BKRVqlixkzkASpiHornD%2Fz2wZTd1jg%3D

  • Haden, P. (2019). Descriptive statistics. In S. A. Fincher & A. V. Robins (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of computing education research (pp. 102–131). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, Z. (2014). Culturally responsive teaching and the brain: Promoting authentic engagement and rigor among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, G. D. (2021). Can I belong in school and sports?: The intersectional value of athletic identity in high school and across the college transition. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 27(4), 613.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoberman, J. M. (1997). Darwin’s athletes: How sport has damaged Black America and preserved the myth of race. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, G. (2021). The bittersweet science: Racism, racketeering, and the political economy of boxing. International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, T. C. (2013). How does it feel to be a problem? Black male students, schools, and learning in enhancing the knowledge base to disrupt deficit frameworks. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 54–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. L. (2006). The sports coach as educator: Re-conceptualising sports coaching. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. (2007). Coaching redefined: An everyday pedagogical endeavour. Sport, Education and Society, 12(2), 159–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. L., Armour, K. M., & Potrac, P. (2003). Constructing expert knowledge: A case study of a top-level professional soccer coach. Sport, Education and Society, 8(2), 213–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. L., & Wallace, M. (2005). Another bad day at the training ground: Coping with ambiguity in the coaching context. Sport, Education and Society, 10(1), 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafai, Y., Searle, K., Martinez, C., & Brayboy, B. (2014). Ethnocomputing with electronic textiles: Culturally responsive open design to broaden participation in computing in American Indian youth and communities. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 241–246). ACM

  • Keller, E. F. (1984). A feeling for the organism: The life and work of Barbara McClintock. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, R. (2016). Sport and technology: An actor-network theory perspective. Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, R., Rosin, C., & Cooper, M. (2020). The agency of numbers: The role of metrics in influencing the valuation of athletes. In J. J. Sterling & M. G. McDonald (Eds.), Sports, society, and technology (pp. 99–119). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, A. (2020). Lakota hoops: Life and basketball on Pine Ridge Indian Reservation. Rutgers University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koekoek, J., & Van Hilvoorde, I. (2018). Digital technology in physical education: Global perspectives. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lachney, M. (2017a). Culturally responsive computing as brokerage: Toward asset building with education-based social movements. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(4), 420–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachney, M. (2017b). Computational communities: African-American cultural capital in computer science education. Computer Science Education, 27(3–4), 175–196.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lachney, M., Bennett, A. G., Eglash, R., Yadav, A., & Moudgalya, S. (2021a). Teaching in an open village: A case study on culturally responsive computing in compulsory education. Computer Science Education, 31(4), 462–488.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lachney, M., Eglash, R., Bennett, A., Babbitt, W., Foy, L., Drazin, M., & Rich, K. M. (2021b). pH empowered: Community participation in culturally responsive computing education. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(3), 333–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachney, M., & Foster, E. K. (2020). Historicizing making and doing: Seymour Papert, Sherry Turkle, and epistemological foundations of the maker movement. History and Technology, 36(1), 54–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachney, M., Green, B., Allen, M. C., & Foy, L. (2022). Ethnocomputing and computational thinking. Computational thinking in education (pp. 112–135). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachney, M., & Yadav, A. (2023). From endpoints to trading zones: Multi-directional exchange for computational empowerment in computer science education. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 37, 100591.

  • Lachney, M., Yadav, A., Drazin, M., Allen, M. C., & Babbitt, W. (2021c). Culturally responsive debugging: A method to support cultural experts’ early engagement with code. Tech Trends, 65(5), 771–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. Guilford Publications.

  • LeBlanc, C. M. A., Purcell, L., and American Academy of Pediatrics, Council on Sports Medicine and Fitness, Canadian Pediatrics Society, Healthy Active Living and Sports Medicine Committee. (2011). Boxing participation by children and adolescents. Pediatrics, 128(3), 617–623.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Light, R. L., & Harvey, S. (2017). Positive pedagogy for sport coaching. Sport, Education and Society, 22(2), 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, D. W., & Schaeffer, N. C. (2006). Standardization-in-interaction: The survey interview. In P. Drew, G. Raymond, & D. Weinberg (Eds.), Talking research (pp. 9–27). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertler, C. A. (2017). Action research communities: Professional learning, empowerment, and improvement through collaborative action research. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno Sandoval, C. D. (2019). Ancestral knowledge meets computer science education: Environmental change in community. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Penney, D. (2006). Coaching as teaching: New acknowledgements in practice. In R. L. Jones (Ed.), The sports coach as educator: Re-conceptualizing sports coaching (pp. 43–54). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, D., & Santo, R. (2021). Student leadership, systems change: Opportunities and tensions for youth impact on district-wide computer science initiatives. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 21(4), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkard, N. D. (1999). Lyric reader: An architecture for creating intrinsically motivating and culturally responsive reading environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 7(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkard, N., Erete, S., Martin, C. K., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2017). Digital youth divas: Exploring narrative-driven curriculum to spark middle school girls’ interest in computational activities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 477–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, Y. A., Thomas, J. O., & Irish, I. (2019). Food for thought: Supporting African American women’s computational algorithmic thinking in an intro cs course. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 641–646).

  • Reeves, T. C., & Lin, L. (2020). The research we have is not the research we need. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1991–2001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, T. C., & Reeves, P. M. (2015). Educational technology research in a VUCA world. Educational Technology, 55(2), 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saury, J., & Durand, M. (1998). Practical knowledge in expert coaches: On-site study of coaching in sailing. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 69(3), 254–266.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, K. A., & Garcia, P. (2016). Techno-social change agents: Fostering activist dispositions among girls of color. Meridians, 15(1), 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, K. A., Sheridan, K. M., & Clark, K. (2015). Culturally responsive computing: A theory revisited. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(4), 412–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, K. A., & White, M. A. (2013). COMPUGIRLS’ standpoint: Culturally responsive computing and its effect on girls of color. Urban Education, 48(5), 657–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2018). Technology as a focus of education policy. In R. Papa & S. W. J. Armfield (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of educational policy (pp. 457–477). Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. N., & May, R. A. B. (2011). The career trajectory of a Black male high school basketball player: A social reproduction perspective. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 46(3), 299–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, J. J., & McDonald, M. G. (2020). Sports, society, and technology: Bodies, practices, and knowledge production. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stoszkowski, J., & Collins, D. (2014). Communities of practice, social learning and networks: Exploiting the social side of coach development. Sport, Education and Society, 19(6), 773–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M. O., Vaughan, J., Rumbold, J. L., & Davids, K. (2021). The learning in development research framework for sports organizations. Sport, Education and Society, 27, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2014). R-words: refusing research. In D. Paris & M. T. Winn (Eds.), Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 223–247). Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S., & Papert, S. (1990). Epistemological pluralism: Styles and voices within the computer culture. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 16(1), 128–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ventresca, M. (2020). The tangled multiplicities of CTE: Scientific uncertainty and the infrastructures of traumatic brain injury. In J. J. Sterling & M. G. McDonald (Eds.), Sports, society, and technology (pp. 73–98). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wikeley, F., & Bullock, K. (2006). Coaching as an educational relationship. In R. L. Jones (Ed.), The sports coach as educator: Re-conceptualising sports coaching (pp. 32–42). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, A., Mayfield, C., Zhou, N., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2014). Computational thinking in elementary and secondary teacher education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 14(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zweben, S., & Bizot, B. (2019). Taulbee survey–Total undergrad CS enrollment rises again, but with fewer new majors; Doctoral degree production recovers from last year’s dip. Computing Research Association

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by Science + Society @ State, Michael Lachney, and the Joe L. Byers and Lucy Bates-Byers Endowment for Technology and Curriculum, Michael Lachney.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Lachney.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures in this study that involved human subject research were approved by Michigan State University’s Institutional Review Board.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from every individual who participated in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lachney, M., Green, B., Yadav, A. et al. Sparring with technology: collaborating with coaches, mentors, and academic staff to develop culturally responsive computing education for a youth boxing program. Education Tech Research Dev (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10344-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10344-2

Keywords

Navigation