Abstract
In the United States, culturally responsive computing is a framework that aims to support broadening the participation of racially and linguistically diverse children in computing and technology education through bottom-up interventions that are community-oriented, technology rich, and culturally dynamic. Despite the important role that youth sports play in many local neighborhoods and communities across demographic groups there is only a small amount of research on developing culturally responsive computing education that incorporates these activities. We report findings from a culturally responsive computing collaboration between computing education researchers and coaches, mentors, and academic staff who ran a youth boxing program that predominantly served African American children. The purpose of the collaboration was to learn about and represent the adults’ expertise and knowledge in the co-development of culturally responsive computing activities. Using an emergent mixed methods research design, we collected qualitative data (i.e., interviews and group discussions) and quantitative data (i.e., pre- and post-surveys) throughout the collaboration. We analyzed these data to study how coaches, mentors, and staff members brought their knowledge and expertise to bear on the co-development of culturally responsive computing activities for the youth boxing program. Our findings show how the coaches, mentors, and academic staff used their expertise and knowledge in ways that leveraged boxing culture to go beyond boxing itself in the co-development of the activities. In addition, even when connections between computing and boxing did not appear authentically motivated this did not negate the adults’ engagement with the culturally responsive computing project. These findings have implications for anti-deficit theorizing about authenticity and inauthenticity in the co-development of culturally responsive computing in youth sports contexts. The construction of authenticity in culturally responsive computing might be less understood as a direct translation from community into education and more so as a negotiation between locally defined demarcations of what is considered authentic and inauthentic.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
To protect the privacy of the participants in this study, data cannot be openly accessed or shared.
References
Adeyemo, A. O. (2022). Place, race, and sports: Examining the beliefs and aspirations of motivated Black male students who play high school sports. Urban Education, 57(1), 154–183.
Allen Kuyenga, M., Lachney, M., & Green, B. (2022). Race-positive career and technical education: Techno-social agency beyond the vocational-liberal divide. Tech Trends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00806-w
Bennett, A., Eglash, R., Lachney, M., & Babbitt, W. (2016). Design agency: Diversifying computer science at the intersections of creativity and culture. In M. Raisinghani (Ed.), Revolutionizing education through web-based instruction (pp. 35–56). IGI Global.
Biesta, G. (2017). Mixed methods in educational research. In R. Coe, M. Waring, L. V. Hedges, & J. Arthur (Eds.), Research methods and methodologies in education (pp. 159–165). Sage.
Bjørndal, C. T., & Ronglan, L. T. (2021). Engaging with uncertainty in athlete development–orchestrating talent development through incremental leadership. Sport, Education and Society, 26(1), 104–116.
Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Sage.
Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547.
Chapman, R., Richardson, D., Cope, E., & Cronin, C. (2020). Learning from the past; a Freirean analysis of FA coach education since 1967. Sport, Education and Society, 25(6), 681–697.
Chuang, H. H. (2016). Leveraging CRT awareness in creating web-based projects through use of online collaborative learning for pre-service teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 857–876.
Clegg, T., Greene, D. M., Beard, N., & Brunson, J. (2020). Data everyday: Data literacy practices in a Division I college sports context. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–13). ACM
Collins, H., Evans, R., & Higgins, C. (2016). Bad call: Technology’s attack on referees and umpires and how to fix it. MIT Press.
Cooper, J. N. (2016). Excellence beyond athletics: Best practices for enhancing Black male student athletes’ educational experiences and outcomes. Equity & Excellence in Education, 49(3), 267–283.
Coopers, J. N. (2019). From exploitation back to empowerment: Black male holistic (under)development through sport and (mis)education. Peter Lang.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
Cushion, C., & Denstone, G. (2011). Etienne Wenger: Coaching and communities of practice. In R. L. Jones, P. Potrac, C. Cushion, & L. R. Ronglan (Eds.), The sociology of sports coaching (pp. 94–107). Routledge.
Davis, J., Lachney, M., Zatz, Z., Babbitt, W., & Eglash, R. (2019). A cultural computing curriculum. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 1171–1175).
Drazan, J. F., Cooke, L., & Eglash, R. (2016). Harmonious integration: Tuning STEM education with generative justice. In 2016 IEEE integrated STEM education conference (ISEC) (pp. 58–64). IEEE
Edwards, H. (2017). The revolt of the Black athlete. University of Illinois Press.
Eglash, R. (1999). African fractals: Modern computing and indigenous design. Rutgers University Press.
Eglash, R., Bennett, A., Cooke, L., Babbitt, W., & Lachney, M. (2021). Counter-hegemonic computing: Toward computer science education for value generation and emancipation. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 21(4), 1–30.
Eglash, R., Bennett, A., Drazan, J., Lachney, M., & Babbitt, W. (2017). A mathematical tool kit for generative justice. ETD-Educação Temática Digital, 19(3), 761–785.
Eglash, R., Gilbert, J. E., & Foster, E. (2013). Toward culturally responsive computing education. Communications of the ACM, 56(7), 33–36.
Eglash, R., Lachney, M., Babbitt, W., Bennett, A., Reinhardt, M., & Davis, J. (2020). Decolonizing education with Anishinaabe arcs: Generative STEM as a path to indigenous futurity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1569–1593.
Fields, A. (2015). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.
Fouché, R. (2012). Analog turns digital: Hip-hop, technology, and the maintenance of racial authenticity. In T. Pinch & K. Bijsterveld (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of sound studies (pp. 505–525). Oxford University Press.
Fouché, R. (2017). Game changer: The technoscientific revolution in sports. JHU Press.
Gaskins, N. R. (2021). Techno-vernacular creativity & innovation: Culturally relevant making inside and outside of the classroom. MIT Press.
Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
Gibbons, J. D. (1993). Nonparametric statistics: An introduction. Sage.
Goins, R., Koshy, S., Scott, A., Payton, F. Cobb, Lundgren, K., & Toldson, I. (2022). The state of tech diversity: The Black tech ecosystem. Retrieved from: https://www.kaporcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/KC22001_black-tech-report.final_.pdf?vgo_ee=aGegc5mQHw%2B1S%2BKRVqlixkzkASpiHornD%2Fz2wZTd1jg%3D
Haden, P. (2019). Descriptive statistics. In S. A. Fincher & A. V. Robins (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of computing education research (pp. 102–131). Cambridge University Press.
Hammond, Z. (2014). Culturally responsive teaching and the brain: Promoting authentic engagement and rigor among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Corwin Press.
Higginbotham, G. D. (2021). Can I belong in school and sports?: The intersectional value of athletic identity in high school and across the college transition. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 27(4), 613.
Hoberman, J. M. (1997). Darwin’s athletes: How sport has damaged Black America and preserved the myth of race. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Horne, G. (2021). The bittersweet science: Racism, racketeering, and the political economy of boxing. International Publishers.
Howard, T. C. (2013). How does it feel to be a problem? Black male students, schools, and learning in enhancing the knowledge base to disrupt deficit frameworks. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 54–86.
Jones, R. L. (2006). The sports coach as educator: Re-conceptualising sports coaching. Routledge.
Jones, R. (2007). Coaching redefined: An everyday pedagogical endeavour. Sport, Education and Society, 12(2), 159–173.
Jones, R. L., Armour, K. M., & Potrac, P. (2003). Constructing expert knowledge: A case study of a top-level professional soccer coach. Sport, Education and Society, 8(2), 213–229.
Jones, R. L., & Wallace, M. (2005). Another bad day at the training ground: Coping with ambiguity in the coaching context. Sport, Education and Society, 10(1), 119–134.
Kafai, Y., Searle, K., Martinez, C., & Brayboy, B. (2014). Ethnocomputing with electronic textiles: Culturally responsive open design to broaden participation in computing in American Indian youth and communities. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 241–246). ACM
Keller, E. F. (1984). A feeling for the organism: The life and work of Barbara McClintock. Macmillan.
Kerr, R. (2016). Sport and technology: An actor-network theory perspective. Manchester University Press.
Kerr, R., Rosin, C., & Cooper, M. (2020). The agency of numbers: The role of metrics in influencing the valuation of athletes. In J. J. Sterling & M. G. McDonald (Eds.), Sports, society, and technology (pp. 99–119). Palgrave Macmillan.
Klein, A. (2020). Lakota hoops: Life and basketball on Pine Ridge Indian Reservation. Rutgers University Press.
Koekoek, J., & Van Hilvoorde, I. (2018). Digital technology in physical education: Global perspectives. Routledge.
Lachney, M. (2017a). Culturally responsive computing as brokerage: Toward asset building with education-based social movements. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(4), 420–439.
Lachney, M. (2017b). Computational communities: African-American cultural capital in computer science education. Computer Science Education, 27(3–4), 175–196.
Lachney, M., Bennett, A. G., Eglash, R., Yadav, A., & Moudgalya, S. (2021a). Teaching in an open village: A case study on culturally responsive computing in compulsory education. Computer Science Education, 31(4), 462–488.
Lachney, M., Eglash, R., Bennett, A., Babbitt, W., Foy, L., Drazin, M., & Rich, K. M. (2021b). pH empowered: Community participation in culturally responsive computing education. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(3), 333–354.
Lachney, M., & Foster, E. K. (2020). Historicizing making and doing: Seymour Papert, Sherry Turkle, and epistemological foundations of the maker movement. History and Technology, 36(1), 54–82.
Lachney, M., Green, B., Allen, M. C., & Foy, L. (2022). Ethnocomputing and computational thinking. Computational thinking in education (pp. 112–135). Routledge.
Lachney, M., & Yadav, A. (2023). From endpoints to trading zones: Multi-directional exchange for computational empowerment in computer science education. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 37, 100591.
Lachney, M., Yadav, A., Drazin, M., Allen, M. C., & Babbitt, W. (2021c). Culturally responsive debugging: A method to support cultural experts’ early engagement with code. Tech Trends, 65(5), 771–784.
Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. Guilford Publications.
LeBlanc, C. M. A., Purcell, L., and American Academy of Pediatrics, Council on Sports Medicine and Fitness, Canadian Pediatrics Society, Healthy Active Living and Sports Medicine Committee. (2011). Boxing participation by children and adolescents. Pediatrics, 128(3), 617–623.
Light, R. L., & Harvey, S. (2017). Positive pedagogy for sport coaching. Sport, Education and Society, 22(2), 271–287.
Maynard, D. W., & Schaeffer, N. C. (2006). Standardization-in-interaction: The survey interview. In P. Drew, G. Raymond, & D. Weinberg (Eds.), Talking research (pp. 9–27). Sage.
Mertler, C. A. (2017). Action research communities: Professional learning, empowerment, and improvement through collaborative action research. Routledge.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Moreno Sandoval, C. D. (2019). Ancestral knowledge meets computer science education: Environmental change in community. Palgrave Macmillan.
Penney, D. (2006). Coaching as teaching: New acknowledgements in practice. In R. L. Jones (Ed.), The sports coach as educator: Re-conceptualizing sports coaching (pp. 43–54). Routledge.
Phelps, D., & Santo, R. (2021). Student leadership, systems change: Opportunities and tensions for youth impact on district-wide computer science initiatives. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 21(4), 1–39.
Pinkard, N. D. (1999). Lyric reader: An architecture for creating intrinsically motivating and culturally responsive reading environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 7(1), 1–30.
Pinkard, N., Erete, S., Martin, C. K., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2017). Digital youth divas: Exploring narrative-driven curriculum to spark middle school girls’ interest in computational activities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 477–516.
Rankin, Y. A., Thomas, J. O., & Irish, I. (2019). Food for thought: Supporting African American women’s computational algorithmic thinking in an intro cs course. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 641–646).
Reeves, T. C., & Lin, L. (2020). The research we have is not the research we need. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1991–2001.
Reeves, T. C., & Reeves, P. M. (2015). Educational technology research in a VUCA world. Educational Technology, 55(2), 26–30.
Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
Saury, J., & Durand, M. (1998). Practical knowledge in expert coaches: On-site study of coaching in sailing. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 69(3), 254–266.
Scott, K. A., & Garcia, P. (2016). Techno-social change agents: Fostering activist dispositions among girls of color. Meridians, 15(1), 65–85.
Scott, K. A., Sheridan, K. M., & Clark, K. (2015). Culturally responsive computing: A theory revisited. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(4), 412–436.
Scott, K. A., & White, M. A. (2013). COMPUGIRLS’ standpoint: Culturally responsive computing and its effect on girls of color. Urban Education, 48(5), 657–681.
Selwyn, N. (2018). Technology as a focus of education policy. In R. Papa & S. W. J. Armfield (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of educational policy (pp. 457–477). Wiley.
Singer, J. N., & May, R. A. B. (2011). The career trajectory of a Black male high school basketball player: A social reproduction perspective. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 46(3), 299–314.
Sterling, J. J., & McDonald, M. G. (2020). Sports, society, and technology: Bodies, practices, and knowledge production. Springer.
Stoszkowski, J., & Collins, D. (2014). Communities of practice, social learning and networks: Exploiting the social side of coach development. Sport, Education and Society, 19(6), 773–788.
Sullivan, M. O., Vaughan, J., Rumbold, J. L., & Davids, K. (2021). The learning in development research framework for sports organizations. Sport, Education and Society, 27, 1–15.
Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2014). R-words: refusing research. In D. Paris & M. T. Winn (Eds.), Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 223–247). Sage.
Turkle, S., & Papert, S. (1990). Epistemological pluralism: Styles and voices within the computer culture. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 16(1), 128–157.
Ventresca, M. (2020). The tangled multiplicities of CTE: Scientific uncertainty and the infrastructures of traumatic brain injury. In J. J. Sterling & M. G. McDonald (Eds.), Sports, society, and technology (pp. 73–98). Palgrave Macmillan.
Wikeley, F., & Bullock, K. (2006). Coaching as an educational relationship. In R. L. Jones (Ed.), The sports coach as educator: Re-conceptualising sports coaching (pp. 32–42). Routledge.
Yadav, A., Mayfield, C., Zhou, N., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2014). Computational thinking in elementary and secondary teacher education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 14(1), 1–16.
Zweben, S., & Bizot, B. (2019). Taulbee survey–Total undergrad CS enrollment rises again, but with fewer new majors; Doctoral degree production recovers from last year’s dip. Computing Research Association
Funding
This study was funded by Science + Society @ State, Michael Lachney, and the Joe L. Byers and Lucy Bates-Byers Endowment for Technology and Curriculum, Michael Lachney.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures in this study that involved human subject research were approved by Michigan State University’s Institutional Review Board.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from every individual who participated in this study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lachney, M., Green, B., Yadav, A. et al. Sparring with technology: collaborating with coaches, mentors, and academic staff to develop culturally responsive computing education for a youth boxing program. Education Tech Research Dev (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10344-2
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10344-2