Skip to main content
Log in

Girls Design with Code Club

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Educational technology research and development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this manuscript, we describe a coding club we created and implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. We were purposeful in creating the club to: (a) focus on design and problem solving as the basis for learning computer coding and (b) include elements to improve the engagement of girls. We ran multiple iterations of a Girls Design with Code Club that involved over 100 girls from 22 countries. We reviewed various sources of data to evaluate how our design and implementation of the coding clubs impacted the girls who participated. In an effort to share our learnings with other researchers and program providers, we share evidence of choices that we believe had positive impacts and others that we can improve in future iterations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The primary data that generated the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, AM, upon reasonable request.

Notes

  1. Project activities can be found here: https://cobuildathome.com/.

References

  • An, Y., Kaplan-Rakowski, R., Yang, J., et al. (2021). Examining K-12 teachers’ feelings, experiences, and perspectives regarding online teaching during the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Technology Research and Development, 69, 2589–2613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10008-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battal, A., Afacan Adanır, G., & Gülbahar, Y. (2021). Computer science unplugged: A systematic literature review. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(1), 24–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buechley, L. (2013, October). Thinking about making. In Keynote address at FabLearn conference. Stanford University.

  • Chakraverty, D. (2022). A cultural impostor? Native American experiences of impostor phenomenon in STEM. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(1), ar15.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, E. (2019). Brotopia: Breaking up the boys’ club of Silicon Valley. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denner, J. (2011). What predicts middle school girls’ interest in computing? International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 3(1), 54–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erol, O., & Çırak, N. S. (2022). The effect of a programming tool scratch on the problem-solving skills of middle school students. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 4065–4086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fee, S. B., & Holland-Minkley, A. M. (2010). Teaching computer science through problems, not solutions. Computer Science Education, 20(2), 129–144.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Fessard, G., Wang, P., & Renna, I. (2019, July). Are there differences in learning gains when programming a tangible object or a simulation?. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM conference on innovation and technology in computer science education (pp. 78–84).

  • Gennari, R., Matera, M., Melonio, A., Rizvi, M., & Roumelioti, E. (2021). Reflection and awareness in the design process: Children ideating, programming and prototyping smart objects. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 80(26–27), 34909–34932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, N. (2022, July 1). Google agrees to pay $118 million to settle pay discrimination case. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/12/business/google-discrimination-settlement-women.html

  • Halverson, E. R., & Sheridan, K. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, V. (2021, September, 20). Students’ internet access before and during the coronavirus pandemic by household socioeconomic status. National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/blogs/nces/post/students-internet-access-before-and-during-the-coronavirus-pandemic-by-household-socioeconomic-status

  • Kalelioğlu, F. (2015). A new way of teaching programming skills to K-12 students: Code. org. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 200–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, A. I., Mejía-Rodríguez, A. M., & Strello, A. (2022). Inequality in remote learning quality during COVID-19: Student perspectives and mitigating factors. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 10(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-022-00143-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lapan, J. C., & Smith, K. N. (2023). “No girls on the software team”: Internship experiences of women in computer science. Journal of Career Development, 50(1), 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maltese, A., Paul, K., Simpson, A., & Zych, A. (2022, August). Creating online supports for at home making and STEM projects during COVID-19 (Work in Progress). In 2022 ASEE annual conference & exposition. https://peer.asee.org/40411

  • Martin, L., Dixon, C., & Betser, S. (2018). Iterative design toward equity: Youth repertoires of practice in a high school maker space. Equity & Excellence in Education, 51(1), 36–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. H., Slawinski Blessing, J., & Schwartz, S. (2006). Gender differences in high-school students’ views about science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(4), 363–381.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Najar, A., Gilberto, A., Hasan, A., Cobo, C., Azevedo, J., & Akmal, M. (2021). Remote learning during COVID-19: Lessons from today, principles for tomorrow. World Bank Group.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). (2023). Diversity and STEM: Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities 2023. Special Report NSF 23-315. National Science Foundation. https://ncses.nsf.gov/wmpd

  • Rankin, Y. A., & Thomas, J. O. (2020, February). The intersectional experiences of Black women in computing. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 199–205).

  • Rich, P. J., Browning, S. F., Perkins, M., Shoop, T., Yoshikawa, E., & Belikov, O. M. (2019). Coding in K-8: International trends in teaching elementary/primary computing. TechTrends, 63(3), 311–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, P., Ferretti, F., Pereira, Â. G., Panella, F., & Wanner, M. (2017). Overview of the maker movement in the European Union. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. Retrieved from https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC107298/jrc_technical_report_-_overview_maker_movement_in_eu.pdf

  • Seo, J. (2019). Is the Maker Movement inclusive of anyone? Three accessibility considerations to invite blind makers to the making world. TechTrends, 63(5), 514–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Sage publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung, E., & Kelley, T. R. (2019). Identifying design process patterns: A sequential analysis study of design thinking. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29, 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins-Yel, K. G., Arnold, A., Bekki, J., Natarajan, M., Bernstein, B., & Randall, A. K. (2022). “I can’t push off my own Mental Health”: Chilly STEM climates, mental health, and STEM persistence among Black, Latina, and White graduate women. Sex Roles, 86(3–4), 208–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xavier Hall, C. D., Wood, C. V., Hurtado, M., Moskowitz, D. A., Dyar, C., & Mustanski, B. (2022). Identifying leaks in the STEM recruitment pipeline among sexual and gender minority US secondary students. PLoS ONE, 17(6), e0268769. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268769

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to acknowledge the participants and instructors of the Girls Design with Code Club Sessions, including Nykema Lindsey, Jona Riznavolli and Claudia Perfecto. This material is based upon work supported by the Infosys Foundation USA and the US National Science Foundation under Grant No. (DRL 2027368). Interested readers can find CoBuild-19 activities and more information at cobuildathome.com. Additionally, those interested in viewing the session can visit YouTube to view Girls Design with Code Club and GDwCC Latina Edition videos here: https://go.iu.edu/4Qh7.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam V. Maltese.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maltese, A.V., Paul, K.M., Yarza, B. et al. Girls Design with Code Club. Education Tech Research Dev 72, 405–423 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10292-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10292-3

Keywords

Navigation