Skip to main content
Log in

“Then You go to Snap”: Multimodal Making of Digital Comics in a Language Arts High School Classroom

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Educational technology research and development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper extends research that looks at the intersection of multimodal composing and maker education. We present findings from a fourth iteration of a multidisciplinary classroom design study in which high school youth made digital comics based on literary novels in an 11th grade language arts classroom in a predominantly Hispanic, low-SES, urban high school. The current study offers a close analysis of students’ processes for making digital comics and how they utilized smartphone-based social media apps and comics tools to construct meaning via transmediation of a traditional literary text. We focused on two (cases) groups of students’ multimodal making. We asked, how do youth leverage their own socio-technical repertoires of practice in multimodal making of digital comics? We used interaction analysis methods to analyze multimodal talk-in-interaction to understand how students used their bodies and technologies across making activities. We found that multimodal making with personal technologies enabled youth to transform and ascribe meaning to school spaces, supported embodied learning across physical and digital spaces, and reinforced agency in school spaces. We discuss implications for expanding maker education into formal non-STEM disciplinary spaces and the importance of grounding learning designs in students’ preferred repertoires of practice and incorporate the tools that are intertwined with their ways of being and knowing if we are to support making practices among culturally, racially, and linguistically diverse learners both in and out of schools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alley, W. (2018). Making english speakers: Makerspaces as constructivist language environments. MEXTESOL Journal, 42(4).

  • Axelrod, D. (2020). Bi/multilingual students’ literary analyses via transmediation into digital comics. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Miami).

  • Barthes, R. (1977). Image-music-text. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2010). Changing text: A social semiotic analysis of textbooks. Designs for Learning, 3(1–2), 10–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blikstein, P. (2018). Maker movement in education: History and prospects. Handbook of Technology Education, 419, 437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, S. M., & Sator, A. (2018). Developing a pedagogy of making through collaborative self-study. Studying Teacher Education, 14(1), 56–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2019). Designing for rightful presence in STEM: The role of making present practices. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(4–5), 616–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, B. (2020). Bringing together multimodal composition and maker education in K–8 classrooms. Language Arts, 97(3), 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehret, C., & Hollett, T. (2013). Re) placing school: Middle school students’ countermobilities while composing with iPods. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(2), 110–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. (2012). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (4th ed.). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional Vision American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J. G. (1994). Gibson’s affordances. Psychological Review, 101(2), 336–342.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halverson, E. R., & Sheridan, K. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howes, A. J. (2020). To be young, gifted, and black: Making the great gatsby relevant to black, indigenous, and students of color. The F Scott Fitzgerald Review, 18(1), 231–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito, M., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., & Watkins, S. C. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewitt, C. E. (2011). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., & O’Halloran, K. (2016). Introducing multimodality. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, S., Shen, J., & Smith, B. E. (2019). Designing discipline-specific roles for interdisciplinary learning: Two comparative cases in an afterschool STEM + L program. International Journal of Science Education, 41(6), 803–826.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, S., Shen, J., Smith, B. E., & Kibler, K. W. (2020). Science identity development: How multimodal composition mediates student role-taking as scientist in a media-rich learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 3187–3212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafai, Y. B., & Burke, Q. (2015). Constructionist gaming: Understanding the benefits of making games for learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 313–334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, J., Axelrod, D., Radojcic, S., & Deroo, M. (2022). Stories from Islita Libre: Digital spatial storytelling as an expression of transnational and immigrant identities. Occasional Paper Series, 48, 96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keune, A., & Peppler, K. (2019). Materials-to‐develop‐with: The making of a makerspace. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 280–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knibbe, J., Grossman, T., & Fitzmaurice, G. (2015, November). Smart makerspace: An immersive instructional space for physical tasks. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Interactive Tabletops & Surfaces, Portugal, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1145/2817721.2817741.

  • Kress, G. (2009). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Márquez, I., Lanzeni, D., & Masanet, M. J. (2022). Teenagers as curators: Digitally mediated curation of the self on Instagram. Journal of Youth Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2022.2053670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCloud, S. (1993). Understanding comics: The invisible art. Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M., & Lapham, L. H. (1994). Understanding media: The extensions of man. MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, K. A. (2010). A review of the digital turn in the new literacy studies. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 246–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, T. P., & Johnston, K. (2020). Rethinking availability in multimodal composing: Frictions in digital design. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 64(3), 259–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco, M. B., Smith, B. E., Deig, A., & Amgott, N. A. (2021). Scaffolding multimodal composition with emergent bilingual students. Journal of Literacy Research, 53(2), 149–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, S., Jewitt, C., & Sakr, M. (2016). Embodied experiences of place: A study of history learning with mobile technologies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(4), 345–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price-Dennis, D., Holmes, K. A., & Smith, E. (2015). Exploring digital literacy practices in an inclusive classroom. The Reading Teacher, 69(2), 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, G. R. (2017). Culturally relevant curriculum versus culturally irrelevant curriculum. In K. Waldrop, T. Amatullah, & T. S. Poetter (Eds.), Curriculum windows: What curriculum theorists of the 1990s can teach us about schools and society today (pp. 173–179). Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, R., & Rouse, A. G. (2022). Taking the maker movement to school: A systematic review of preK-12 school-based makerspace research. Educational Research Review, 35, 100413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, D. W., & Miller, M. E. (2016). Designing for diverse classrooms: Using iPads and digital cameras to compose eBooks with emergent bilingual/biliterate four-year-olds. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 16(4), 425–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R. (1998). Reading as social interaction: The empirical grounding of reading. Semiotica, 118(3–4), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1998.118.3-4.281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semali, L. M., & Fueyo, J. (2002). Transmediation as a metaphor for new literacies in multimedia classrooms. Reading Online, 5(5), 2001–2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. E. (2018). Composing for affect, audience, and identity: Toward a multidimensional understanding of adolescents’ multimodal composing goals and designs. Written Communication, 35(2), 182–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. E. (2019). Collaborative multimodal composing: Tracing the unique partnerships of three pairs of adolescents composing across three digital projects. Literacy, 53(1), 14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. E., Amgott, N., & Malova, I. (2022). It made me think in a different way: Bilingual students’ perspectives on Multimodal Composing in the English Language Arts Classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 56(2), 525–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stemler, S. (2000). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation, 7(1), 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suhor, C. (1984). Towards a semiotics-based curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16(3), 247–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, T. (2022). Multimodality and identity. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, T., & Djonov, E. (2015). Notes towards a semiotics of kinetic typography. Social Semiotics, 25(2), 244–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wargo, J. M. (2018). Writing with wearables? Young children’s intra-active authoring and the sounds of emplaced invention. Journal of Literacy Research, 50, 502–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wargo, J. M., Morales, M., & Corbitt, A. (2022). Fabricating response: Preservice elementary teachers remediating response to The Circuit through 3D printing and design. Curriculum Inquiry, 52, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlwend, K. E., Scott, J. A., Yi, J. H., Deliman, A., & Kargin, T. (2018). Hacking toys and remixing media: Integrating maker literacies into early childhood teacher education. In S. Danby, M. Fleer, C. Davidson, & M. Hatzigianni (Eds.), Digital childhoods: Technologies in children’s everyday lives (pp. 147–162). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daryl Axelrod.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest regarding this study and no funding was received for this project. Informed consent with human subjects was obtained in compliance with all ethical standards determined by the Internal Review Boards of participating institutions.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Axelrod, D., Kahn, J. “Then You go to Snap”: Multimodal Making of Digital Comics in a Language Arts High School Classroom. Education Tech Research Dev 72, 41–57 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10285-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10285-2

Keywords

Navigation