Skip to main content
Log in

Co-designing a communication app to enhance collaborative communication support for secondary students with autism

  • Development Article
  • Published:
Educational technology research and development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The complexities of including students with autism in schools throughout Australia has resulted in the increased necessity for collaboration between stakeholders. For included students with autism, secondary school presents a variety of subjects, teachers and peers that have the potential to increase anxiety levels compared to their primary experience. Communication between important stakeholders is critical in alleviating issues for students with autism before they escalate. In this paper, researchers report and reflect on the implementation of a co-design process as a rigorous practice-based research methodology that provided an empathy focussed platform to explore possibilities in designing a prototype digital solution to support students with autism. The project was designed to identify communication issues associated with the secondary experience of students with autism and to create solutions via the development of a rapid prototype communication app. Findings from this project suggest that involving diverse stakeholders in co-designing and exploring possibilities in complex school environments had two benefits: stakeholders had the opportunity to see the challenge from other parties’ perspectives, and the process promoted creativity and flexibility in generating people-based solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2016). Autism in Australia: Disability, ageing and carers, Australia: Summary of findings, 2015 (ABS cat. no. 4430.0). Canberra: ABS. Retrieved from https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/

  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). (2017). Autism in Australia. Retrieved from https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/disability/autism-in-australia/contents/autism

  • Azad, G. F., Marcus, S. C., & Mandell, D. S. (2021). Partners in school: Optimising communication between parents and teachers of children with Austism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 31(4), 438–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2020.1830100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azad, G. F., Kim, M., Marcus, S. C., Sheridan, S. M., & Mandell, D. S. (2016). Parent-teacher communication about children with Autism spectrum disorders: An examination of collaborative problem-solving. Psychology in the Schools, 53(10), 1071–1084. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azad, G. F., Wolk, C. B., & Mandell, D. S. (2018). Ideal interactions: Perspectives of parents and teachers of children with autism spectrum disorder. School Community Journal, 28(2), 63–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balyer, A., Karatas, H., & Alci, B. (2015). School principals’ roles in establishing collaborative professional learning communities at schools. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1340–1347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardroff-Zieger, L., & Tan, J. (2012). Improving parent involvement in secondary schools through communication technology. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 30(13), 30–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, K. L., Iyer, S. N., Boon, R. T., & Fore, C. (2010). Twenty ways for classroom teachers to collaborate with speech-language pathologists. Intervention in School and Clinic, 45, 333–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451208328833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blue-Banning, M., Summers, J., Frankland, C., Nelson, L., & Beegle, G. (2004). Dimensions of family and professional partnerships: Constructive guidelines for collaboration. Exceptional Children, 70(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290407000203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Stoll, L., Thomas, S., Wallace, M., Greenwood, A., Hawkey, K., Ingram, M., Atkinson, A., & Smith, M. (2005). Creating and sustaining effective professional learning communities. Research Report 637. DfES and University of Bristol.

  • Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. Harper Collins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, T. L., & Burrego, J. (2012). Parents’ involvement in ASD treatment: What is their role? Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 19(3), 423–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2011.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, L. (2017). Supporting students with Austism spectrum disorder. In M. Hyde, L. Carpenter, & S. Dole (Eds.), Diversity, inclusion and engagement (pp. 284–307). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. (1967). Wicked problems. Management Science, 13(4), 141–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremin, K., Healy, O., & Gordon, M. (2017). Parental perceptions on the transition to secondary school for their child with autism. Advances in Autism, 3(2), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1108/AIA-09-2016-0024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M., Adams, D., Roberts, J., & Westerveld, M. (2019). C How do teachers support their students on the autism spectrum in Australian primary schools? Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 20(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (2007). Designerly ways ofknowing. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-301-9

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C., & Pearce, J. (2012). Doing research in design. Berg.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Daly-Smith, A., Quarmby, T., Archbold, V. S., Corrigan, N., Wilson, D., Resaland, G. K., Bartholomew, J. B., Singh, A., Tjomsland, H. E., Sherar, L. B., & Chalkley, A. (2020). Using a multi-stakeholder experience-based process to co-develop the creating active schools framework. International Journal of Behavioural Nutrition & Physyical Activity, 17(13), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-0917-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dam, R & Siang, T. (2020). From prototype to product: Ensuring your solution is feasible and viable. Retrieved from www.interaction-design.org

  • Dam, R. & Teo, S. (2022). Design thinking: A quick overview. In Interaction design foundation. Retrieved from https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/design-thinking-a-quick-overview

  • Deppeler, J. (2012). Developing inclusive practices: Innovation through collaboration. In C. Boyle & K. Topping (Eds.), What works in inclusion? (pp. 125–138). Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deserti, A., Eckhardt, J., Kaletka, C., Rizzo, F., & Wascher, E. (2019). Co-design for society in innovation. In J. Howaldt, C. Kaletka, A. Schroder, & M. Zirnbiebl (Eds.), Atlas of social innovation: A world of new practice (Vol. 2, pp. 90–95). Oekom Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Design Council. (2022). What is the framework for innovation? Design Council's evolved double diamond. Retrieved from https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/what-framework-innovation-design-councils-evolved-double-diamond

  • Dillon, G. V., & Underwood, J. D. (2012). Parental perspectives of students with autism spectrum disorders transitioning from primary to secondary school in the United Kingdom. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 27(2), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357612441827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32, 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabri, M., Andrews, P. C. S., & Pukki, H. (2016). Using design thinking to engage autistic students in the creation of an online toolkit to help with transition into higher education. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 10(2), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAT-02-2016-0008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falkmer, M., Anderson, K., Joosten, A., & Falkmer, T. (2015). Parents perspective on inclusive schools for children with autism spectrum conditions. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 62(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2014.984589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, J. S. (2016). Technology and school-home communication. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 11(2), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/22040552.2016.1227252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear-Smith, F., Jackson, C., & Greenhalgh, T. (2015). Co-design and implementation research: Challenges and solutions for ethics committees. BMC Medical Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0072-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallet, D. (2017). Investigating the use of a digital diary for home-school communication between parents and teachers of children with additional needs. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Retrieved from https://ro.ecu.au.theses/2036

  • Hawryszkiewycz, I., & Alqahatani, A. (2020). Integrating open innovation process with the double design thinking model. In Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Knowledge Management. Coventry University, UK (2–4 December, 2020).

  • Hersch, D., O’Rourke, J., & Lewis, A. (2013). Collaborations towards inclusion. The Journal of Clinical Practice in Speech-Language Pathology, 15(3), 15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, N., & Lewis, S. (2008). “Make me normal”: The views and experiences of pupils on the autistic spectrum in mainstream secondary schools. Autism, 12(1), 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361307085267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson-Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., & Cetinkaya, M. (2013). Design thinking: Past, present and possible futures. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(2), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. H. (2013). Design for care: Innovating healthcare experience. Rosenfeld Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. H., & Van Patter, G. K. (2009). Design 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0: The rise of visual sensemaking. Next Design Leadership Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M., & Lee, Y. (2019). Service storytelling: Exploring storytelling models in the context of the service design process. In W. Chung & C. Shin (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary practice in industrial design. AHFE 2018. Advances in intelligent systems and computing (Vol. 790, pp. 299–311). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94601-6_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kimbell, L. (2012). Rethinking design thinking: Part II. Design and culture. The Journal of the Design Studies Forum, 4(2), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.2752/175470812X13281948975413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Wong, B., & Hong, H. Y. (2015). Design thinking for education: Conceptions and applications in teaching and learning. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kueh, C. & Thom, R. (2018). Visualising empathy: Understanding: A framework to teach user-based innovation in design. In S. Griffith, K. Carruthers, & M. Bliemel (Eds.), Visual tools for developing student capacity for cross-disciplinary collaboration, innovation and entrepreneurship. Champaign: Common Ground Publishing.

  • Kumm, A. J., Viljoen, M., & de Vries, P. J. (2021). The digital divide in technologies for autism: Feasability considerations for low-and middle-income countries. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05084-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, S. M., Wardrip, P. S., & Gomez, L. M. (2014). Co-design of interdisciplinary projects as a mechanism for school capacity growth. Improving Schools, 17(1), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480213519517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, Y., & Suen, B. (2015). Experiencing empathy in design education through community engagement. International Journal of Continuing Education and Lifelong Learning, 7(2), 53–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilley, R. (2013). It’s an absolute nightmare: maternal experiences of enrolling children diagnosed with autism in primary school in Sydney. Australia. Disability & Society, 28(4), 514–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.717882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilley, R. (2015). Trading places: Autism inclusion disorder and school change. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(4), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2014.935813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazon, C., Etchegoyhen, K., Saint-Supery, I., Amestpy, A., Bouvard, M., Consel, C., & Sauzeon, H. (2022). Fostering parents-professional collaboration for facilitating the school inclusion of students with ASD: Design of the “ToGather” web-based prototype. Education Technology Research Development, 70, 232–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10073-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNerney, C., Hill, V., & Pellicano, E. (2015). Choosing a secondary school for young people on the autism spectrum: a multi-informant study. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(10), 1096–1116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2015.1037869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandy, W., Murin, M., Baykaner, O., Staunton, S., Hellriegel, J., Anderson, S., & Skuse, D. (2016). The transition from primary to secondary school in mainstream education for children with autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 20(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361314562616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuske, H. J., McGhee Hassrick, E., Bronstein, B., Hauptman, L., Aponte, C., Levato, L., & Smith, T. (2018). Broken bridges-new school transitions for students with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review on difficulties and strategies for success. Autism, 23(2), 306–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361318754529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olakanmi, O. A., Akcayir, G., Ishola, O. M., & Epp, C. D. (2020). Using technology in special education: Current practices and trends. Education Technology Research and Development, 68, 1711–1738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09795-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pena, E. D., & Quinn, R. (2003). Developing effective collaboration teams in speech–language pathology: A case study. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 24(2), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/15257401030240020201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R., & Brooks, R. (2016). Parental perspectives on the transition to secondary school for students with Asperger syndrome and high-functioning autism: A pilot survey study. British Journal of Special Education, 43(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. M., Adams, D., Heussler, H., Keen, D., Paynter, J., Trembath, D., Westerveld, M., & Williams, K. (2018). Protocol for a prospective longitudinal study investigating the participation and educational trajectories of Australian students with autism. British Medical Journal Open, 8, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. H., & Wright, V. H. (2008). Assessing technology’s role in communication between parents and middle schools. Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 7, 36–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saggers, B., Klug, D., Harper-Hill, K., Ashburner, J., Costley, D., Clark, T., Bruck, S., Trembath, D., Webster, A. A., & Carrington, S. (2016). Australian autism educational needs analysis: What are the needs of schools, parents and students on the Autism Spectrum? (Full Report). Cooperative research centre for living with autism.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, E. (2017). Design research at the crossroads of education and practice. She Ji, 3(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2017.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, E., & Stappers, P. J. (2007). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santorosa, L., & Conforto, D. (2017). Educational and digital inclusion for subjects with autism spectrum disorders in 1:1 technological configuration. Computers in Human Behaviour, 60, 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senate Education and Employment References Committee. (2016). Access to real learning: The impact of policy, funding and culture on students with disability. Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, A., Beamish, W., & Bryer, F. (2005). Communication between home and school of children with Autistic Spectrum Disorder in primary schools. In School of cognition, language, and special education, Griffith University (pp. 113–122). Retrieved from http://www98.griffith.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/handle/10072/8642/29484.pdf

  • Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoner, J. B., Angell, M. E., House, J. J., & Bock, S. J. (2007). Transitions: Perspectives from parents of young children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 19(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-007-9034-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syriopoulou-Dellia, K., Cassimos, D. C., & Polychronopoulou, S. A. (2016). Collaboration between teachers and parents of children with autism on issues of education. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 55, 230–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2016.04.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed.). Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strnadova, I., Arthur-Kelly, M., & Foreman, P. (2022). Inclusion in Action (6th ed.). Cengage Learning Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, A. (2009). Supporting students with autistic spectrum disorder at secondary school: A parent and student perspective. Educational Psychology in Practice, 25(2), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667360902905239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschimmel, K. (2012). Design thinking as an effective toolkit for innovation. In Proceedings from the XX111 ISPIM Conference: Action for innovation: Innovating from experience (pp. 1–20). Barcelona.

  • Tso, M., & Strnadová, I. (2017). Students with autism transitioning from primary to secondary schools: parents’ perspectives and experiences. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1(15), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2016.1197324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Akker, J., et al. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In V. Den Akker (Ed.), Design methodology and developmental research in education and training (pp. 1–14). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wintle, J., Krupa, T., Cramm, H., & DeLuca, C. (2017). A scoping review of the tensions in OT–teacher collaborations. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, & Early Intervention, 10(4), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2017.1359134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yahyaoui, S. (2020). The design thinking toolkit: 100+ method cards to create innovative products. Retrieved from https://uxplanet.org/the-design-thinking-toolbox-100-tools-to-create-innovative-products-50ede1f5e3c1

  • Zablotsky, B., Boswell, K., & Smith, C. (2012). An evaluation of school involvement and satisfaction of parents of children with autism spectrum disorders. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 117(4), 316–330. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-117.4.316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamenopoulos, T., & Alexiou, K. (2018). Co-design as collaborative research. University of Bristol/AHRC Connected Communities Programme.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. O’Rourke.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no potential conflicts of interest arising from the research.

Ethical approval

The research described in this paper was given ethical clearance by the Edith Cowan University Human Research Ethics Committee.

Informed consent

All study participants signed informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 4.

Table 4 Application of the Double Diamond Display Process (DDDP) in the co-design workshop one

4

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Rourke, J., Kueh, C., Holly, C. et al. Co-designing a communication app to enhance collaborative communication support for secondary students with autism. Education Tech Research Dev 71, 579–604 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10170-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10170-4

Keywords

Navigation