Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ethics and educational technologies

  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is in response to the manuscript entitled “Ethical oversight of student data in learning analytics: a typology derived from a cross-continental, cross-institutional perspective” (Willis et al., Educ Technol Res Dev 64(5):881–901, 2016) from an ethical perspective. The impact of the article is that it offered a working typology of ethical approaches and aims to determine the ethical intersection of internal student data usage and application. Their review of ethical approaches included research institutions from three continents. Findings from this review have implications for applied research with student data. This is particularly interesting given the differences in ethical approaches in the United States (more utilitarian) and the European Union’s rather strict deontological approach. While learning analytics offer rich student data for personalizing educational technologies, there is associated potential for threats to autonomy and privacy. A limitation of the topology is that it did not include other people groups (e.g., Asia, South America, Australia). Future learning analytics, design, application, and research will need to consider both where the technologies were developed and where educational technologies are being applied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Campbell, K. (2015). The feminist instructional designer: An autoethnography. In B. Hokanson, G. Clinton, & M. W. Tracey (Eds.), The design of learning experience: Creating the future of educational technology (pp. 231–249). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damarin, S. K. (1994). Equity, caring, and beyond: Can feminist ethics inform educational technology? Educational Technology, 34(2), 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ess, C. (2009). Digital media ethics. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernback, J., & Papacharissi, Z. (2007). Online privacy as legal safeguard: The relationship among consumer, online portal, and privacy policies. New Media and Society, 9(5), 715–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, S. F., Hagan, M. B., Heymann, P., Heflin, B. H., & Bagner, D. M. (2020). Apps as learning tools: A systematic review. Pediatrics, 145(1), e20191579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston, M., & Lin, L. (2012, March). Humanizing the classroom by flipping the homework versus lecture equation. In Society for information technology and teacher education international conference (pp. 1177–1182). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

  • Hsiao, C. C., Huang, J. C., Huang, A. Y., Lu, O. H., Yin, C. J., & Yang, S. J. (2019). Exploring the effects of online learning behaviors on short-term and long-term learning outcomes in flipped classrooms. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1160–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McStay, A., & Bakir, V. (2006). Privacy, online advertising and marketing techniques: The paradoxical disappearance of the user. Ethical Space: The International Journal of Communication Ethics, 3(1), 24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. D. (2019a). Neuroethics in educational technology: Keeping the brain in mind when developing frameworks for ethical decision-making. In T. Parsons, L. Lin, & D. Cockerham (Eds.), Mind, brain, and technology: How people learn in the age of new technologies (pp. 195–210). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. D. (2019b). Ethical challenges in digital psychology and cyberpsychology. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reiner, P. B., & Nagel, S. K. (2017). Technologies of the extended mind: Defining the issues. In J. Illes & S. Hossain (Eds.), Neuroethics: Anticipating the future (pp. 108–122). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. M. (2005). Innovations in instructional technology: An introduction to this volume. In J. M. Spector, C. Ohrazda, A. Van Schaack, & D. A. Wiley (Eds.), Innovations in instructional technology: Essays in honor of M. David Merrill (pp. 1–2). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. M. (2015). Foundations of educational technology: Integrative approaches and interdisciplinary perspectives (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. M. (2016). Ethics in educational technology: Towards a framework for ethical decision making in and for the discipline. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(5), 1003–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. M., Merrill, M. D., Elen, J., & Bishop, M. J. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, J. E., Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2016). Ethical oversight of student data in learning analytics: A typology derived from a cross-continental, cross-institutional perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(5), 881–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas D. Parsons.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

No research involving human participants and/or animals.

Informed consent

Informed consent is not applicable for this review.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parsons, T.D. Ethics and educational technologies. Education Tech Research Dev 69, 335–338 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09846-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09846-6

Keywords

Navigation