Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Flipping the experimentation process: influences on science process skills

  • Development Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports on a study aiming at examining the development of science process skills through the implementation of experiments in a science course which was performed in flipped classroom design. Flipped classroom model was implemented for a series of experimentation activities in a science classroom in which 38 science teacher candidates were enrolled. Both quantitative and qualitative data were used to acquire a better understanding of the improvement in science process skills. A test of Integrated Process Skills, participants’ experiment plans and interviews were used as data gathering tools. The results indicated that flipped learning in the experimentation process positively influenced especially identifying and stating hypotheses and operationally defining science process skills. It was observed that the provision of the required prior conceptual and procedural knowledge via watching videos as out of-school activities was an effective way in flipping the experimentation process. The affordances of videos and the guidance of the instructor played a key role on the teacher candidates’ laboratory oriented learning journey. Along with the results, some implications were provided for flipping the courses including such practical sessions as experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945–1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akben, N. (2015). Improving science process skills in science and technology course activities using the inquiry method. Education and Science, 40(179), 111–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydoğdu, B., & Ergin, Ö. (2008). The effects of open-ended and inquiry-based laboratory techniques on students’ science process skill. Egean Education Journal, 9(2), 15–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgin, İ. (2006). The effects of hands-on activities incorporating a cooperative learning approach on eight grade students’ science process skills and attitudes toward science. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 1(9), 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. C., Okey, J. R., & Wise, K. C. (1985). Development of an integrated process skill test: TIPS II. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(2), 169–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. W. (2006). Scientific inquiry and science teaching. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 1–12). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerini, B., Murray, I., & Reiss, M. (2003). Student review of the science curriculum: Major findings. London: Planet science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Chen, N. S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers & Education, 79, 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colley, K. E. (2006). Understanding ecology content knowledge and acquiring science process skills through project-based science instruction. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 43(1), 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, M. P. (2006). Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles. Science Education, 90(6), 1073–1091.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çakıroğlu, Ü., & Öztürk, M. (2017). Flipped classroom with problem-based activities: Exploring self-regulated learning in a programming language course. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 337–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çalık, M., & Coll, R. K. (2012). Investigating socio scientific issues via scientific habits of mind: Development and validation of the scientific habits of mind survey. International Journal of Science Education, 34(12), 1909–1930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, A., Lam, T. K., Thomas, S., Richardson, J., Kam, B. H., Lau, K. H., et al. (2019). Flipped classroom pedagogy: Using pre-class videos in an undergraduate business information systems management course. Education & Training, 61(6), 756–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demir, S., & Şahin, F. (2015). Capacity of the science teacher candidates to create open-ended experiments. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 33, 433–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durmaz, H., & Mutlu, S. (2016). The effect of an instructional intervention on elementary students’ science process skills. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(4), 433–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2015.1118003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elfeky, A. I. M., Masadeh, T. S. Y., & Elbyaly, M. Y. H. (2020). Advance organizers in flipped classroom via e-learning management system and the promotion of integrated science process skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ercan, F., & Taşdere, A. (2011). Identification of teacher candidates’ skills in designing experiments with various assessment tools [Special Issue]. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Science. pp. 231–238.

  • Geban, Ö., Askar, P., & Özkan, İ. (1992). Effects of computer simulations and problem-solving approaches on high school students. The Journal of Educational Research, 86(1), 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gormally, C., Brickman, P., Hallar, B., & Armstrong, N. (2009). Effects of inquiry-based learning on students’ science literacy skills and confidence. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning., 3(2), 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, A. K., & Thompson, J. (1993). Secondary school students’ understandings of scientific processes: An interview study. Research in Science & Technological Education, 11(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514930110103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harahap, F., Nasution, N. E. A., & Manurung, B. (2019). The effect of blended learning on student's learning achievement and science process skills in plant tissue culture course. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 521–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlen, W. (2000). Teaching, learning and assessing science 5–12. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlen, W. (2005). Teachers' summative practices and assessment for learning–tensions and synergies. Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 207–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huppert, J., Lomask, S. M., & Lazarowitz, R. (2002). Computer simulations in the high school: Students' cognitive stages, science process skills and academic achievement in microbiology. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 803–821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iftakhar, S. (2016). Google classroom: What works and how? Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 3, 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, R. H. (2012). Exploring the use of video podcasts in education: A comprehensive review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 820–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knabb, M. T., & Misquith, G. (2006). Assessing inquiry process skills in the lab using a fast, simple, inexpensive fermentation model system. American Biology Teacher, 68(4), 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laroche, L. H., Wulfsberg, G., & Young, B. (2003). Discovery videos: A safe, tested, time efficient way to incorporate discovery-laboratory experiments into the classroom. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(8), 962–966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, T., Logan, J., & Waugh, M. (2016). Students’ perceptions of the value of using videos as a pre-class learning experience in the flipped classroom. TechTrends, 60(3), 245–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lou, S. J., Chen, N. C., Tsai, H. Y., Tseng, K. H., & Shih, R. C. (2012). Using blended creative teaching: Improving a teacher education course on designing materials for young children. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(5), 776–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarr, O. (2009). A review of podcasting in higher education: Its influence on the traditional lecture. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 309–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesci, G., & ReneeS, S. (2017). Changing preservice science teachers’ views of nature of science: Why some conceptions may be more easily altered than others. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 329–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • MoNE. (2018). Fen bilimleridersiöğretimprogramı [Elementary science course curriculum]. Ankara: Ministry of National Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • MuşluKaygısız, G., Benzer, E., & Uçar, M. (2017). Evaluation of experimental designs based on scientific process skills of science teacher candidates. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 7(3), 467–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., et al. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prajoko, S., Amin, M., Rohman, F., & Gipayana, M. (2016). The effect of local materials usage for science practicum on students’ science process skills. Educational Research International, 5(4), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W. M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). The development of science process skills in authentic contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(2), 127–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secker, C. V. (2002). Effects of inquiry-based teacher practices on science excellence and equity. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(3), 151–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, L. B., & Dorn, B. (2016). Enabling and integrating online formative assessment in a flipped calculus course. Primus, 26(6), 585–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solé-Llussà, A., Aguilar, D., & Ibáñez, M. (2019). Video worked examples to promote elementary students’ science process skills: A fruit decomposition inquiry activity. Journal of Biological Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1699149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solé-Llussà, A., Aguilar, D., & Ibáñez, M. (2020). Video-worked examples to support the development of elementary students’ science process skills: A case study in an inquiry activity on electrical circuits. Research in Science & Technological Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1786361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Şahin, A., Cavlazoglu, B., & Zeytuncu, Y. E. (2015). Flipping a college calculus course: A case study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 142–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teig, N., Scherer, R., & Nilsen, T. (2018). More isn't always better: The curvilinear relationship between inquiry-based teaching and student achievement in science. Learning and Instruction, 56, 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vartak, R., Ronad, A., & Ghanekar, V. (2013). Enzyme assay: An investigative approach to enhance science process skills. Journal of Biological Education, 47(4), 253–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmeyer, R., & Rheinberg, F. (2005). A surprising effect of feedback on learning. Learning and Instruction, 15(6), 589–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacharia, Z. C. (2007). Comparing and combining real and virtual experimentation: An effort to enhance students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 120–132.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funding was funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Education and Instructional Department, Fatih Faculty of Education, Trabzon University, 61335, Sogutlu, Akcaabat, Trabzon, Turkey

    Ünal Çakiroğlu

  2. Fatih Faculty of Education, Mathematics and Science Education, Trabzon University, 61335, Sogutlu, Akcaabat, Trabzon, Turkey

    Onurhan Güven

  3. Department of Banking and Finance, Vakfıkebir Vocational School, Trabzon University, 61400, Vakfıkebir, Trabzon, Turkey

    Esin Saylan

Authors
  1. Ünal Çakiroğlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Onurhan Güven
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Esin Saylan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ünal Çakiroğlu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

“Did videos affect the design of your experiments? If yes, how?”

“Were the videos beneficial for you? If yes, what were their benefits?”

“What do you think about the Google Classroom interface? What are the advantages and disadvantages of it?”

“Would you prefer to use it in your classes?”, “What skills (observation, data record, etc.) could you develop while doing experiments?”, and “Could you use these skills while experimenting?”

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Çakiroğlu, Ü., Güven, O. & Saylan, E. Flipping the experimentation process: influences on science process skills. Education Tech Research Dev 68, 3425–3448 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09830-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09830-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation