Abstract
Recent reports suggest an increase in the number of individuals with cognitive and developmental disabilities. To ensure equal opportunities for these learners, special education practices must be appropriately improved and scaled. Educational and assistive technologies are a possible avenue for meeting this need. To provide insight into recent technology practices in special education contexts, this study reviews recent literature (2014—2018) on the use of technology to support learners with cognitive and developmental disabilities. This review included 126 publications, which were a combination of journal articles and conference papers, found through the ACM, IEEE, ScienceDirect, and SSCI databases. The publications were analyzed to determine their general characteristics (e.g., number and age of participants and lengths of interventions), the contexts of technology use, specific learner characteristics, the subjects or skills the intervention(s) aimed to improve, the characteristics of the technologies, and the outcomes associated with their use. The results revealed that the most examined technology was games and the most studied outcome was improvements to learners’ cognitive skills. Additionally, participants in the majority of the publications were pre-college students with learning disabilities. The most studied topics belonged to the natural sciences while job skills were one of the least studied. Interventions were primarily conducted in formal educational environments and were implemented over 5–10 weeks in most cases. Based on the review, more detail in reporting and more attention to promoting life, job, and social skills are recommended.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, B., Ashford-Rowe, K., Barajas-Murphy, N., Dobbin, G., Knott, J., McCormack, M., et al. (2019). Educause Horizon Report: 2019 Higher Education Edition. Retrieved from https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2019/4/2019horizonreport.pdf?la=en&hash=C8E8D444AF372E705FA1BF9D4FF0DD4CC6F0FDD1
APA. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publication.
Arici, F., Yildirim, P., Caliklar, Ş., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2019). Research trends in the use of augmented reality in science education: Content and bibliometric mapping analysis. Computers & Education, 142, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103647.
Andrews, R. (2005). Systematic literature reviews: The impact of networked ICT on literacy education. In A. Goodwyn & A. Stables (Eds.), Learning to read critically in language and literacy. London: Sage.
Aslanoglou, K., Papazoglou, T., & Karagiannidis, C. (2018). Educational robotics and down syndrome: Investigating student performance and motivation. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Ayres, K. M., Mechling, L., & Sansosti, F. J. (2013). The use of mobile technologies to assist with life skills/independence of students with moderate/severe intellectual disability and/or autism spectrum disorders: Considerations for the future of school psychology. Psychology in the Schools, 50(3), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21673.
Beatty, K. (2013). Beyond the Classroom: Mobile Learning the Wider World (pp. 1–20). Retrieved from The International Research Foundation for English Language Education (TIRF) website: https://www.tirfonline.org/english-in-the-workforce/mobile-assisted-language-learning/beyond-the-classroom-mobile-learning-the-wider-world/
Becker, H., Roberts, G., Morrison, J., & Silver, J. (2005). Recruiting people with disabilities as research participants: Challenges and strategies to address them. Mental Retardation, 42, 471–475. https://doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2004)42<471:RPWDAR>2.0.CO;2.
Boat, T. F., & Wu, J. T. (2015). Mental disorders and disabilities among low-income children. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Boyle, C. A., Boulet, S., Schieve, L. A., Cohen, R. A., Blumberg, S. J., Yeargin-Allsopp, M., et al. (2011). Trends in the prevalence of developmental disabilities in US children, 1997–2008. Pediatrics, 127(6), 1034–1042. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-2989.
Burke, A., & Hughes, J. (2018). A shifting landscape: Using tablets to support learning in students with diverse abilities. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2017.1396492.
Burston, J. (2014). The reality of MALL: Still on the fringes. CALICO Journal, 31(1), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.31.1.103-125.
Campigotto, R., McEwen, R., & Demmans Epp, C. (2013). Especially social: Exploring the use of an iOS application in special needs classrooms. Computers & Education, 60, 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.002.
Cano, S., Palta, A., Posso, F., & Peñeñory, V. M. (2017). Towards designing a serious game for literacy in children with moderate cognitive disability. Paper presented at the International Conference on Human Computer Interaction, Cancun, Mexico.
Çattık, E. O., & Ergenekon, Y. (2018). Effectiveness of video modeling combined with auditory technology support in teaching skills for using community resources to individuals with intellectual disabilities. Education & Science/Egitim ve Bilim, 42(193), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2018.7182.
CDC. (2018). Facts about developmental disabilities. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/developmentaldisabilities/facts.html
Cheng, S. C., & Lai, C. L. (2019). Facilitating learning for students with special needs: A review of technology-supported special education studies. Journal of Computers in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00150-8.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104.
Cullen, J. M., Alber-Morgan, S. R., Schnell, S. T., & Wheaton, J. E. (2014). Improving reading skills of students with disabilities using Headsprout comprehension. Remedial and Special Education, 35(6), 356–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514534075.
Cumming, T. M., Strnadová, I., & Singh, S. (2014). iPads as instructional tools to enhance learning opportunities for students with developmental disabilities: An action research project. Action Research, 12(2), 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750314525480.
Dawe, M. (2006). Desperately seeking simplicity: How young adults with cognitive disabilities and their families adopt assistive technologies. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems (pp. 1143–1152). Montréal, Québec, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124943
Demmans Epp, C., & Makos, A. (2013). Using simulated learners and simulated learning environments within a special education context. In Workshop on Simulated Learners at Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED). Memphis, TN, USA, pp. 1–10.
Demmans Epp, C., McEwen, R., Campigotto, R., & Moffatt, K. (2015). Information practices and user interfaces: Student use of an iOS application in special education. Educ Inf Technol, 21, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9392-6.
Demmans Epp, C., Akcayir, G., & Phirangee, K. (2019). Think twice: exploring the effect of reflective practices with peer review on reflective writing and writing quality in computer-science education. Reflective Practice, 20, 533–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2019.1642189.
Demmans Epp, C., & Phirangee, K. (2019). Exploring mobile tool integration: Design activities carefully or students may not learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59, 101791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101791.
Dey, I. (2005). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. New York: Routledge.
Drysdale, J. S., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., & Halverson, L. R. (2013). An analysis of research trends in dissertations and theses studying blended learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.003.
Elwood, S., & Mitchell, K. (2014). Technology, memory, and collective knowing. Cultural Geographies, 22(1), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474014556062.
Fasciana, M. (2019). Beliefs of General Education Teachers Toward Effective Methods of Literacy Instruction for English Language Learners: Attitudes Toward Integrated English as a New Language. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis), Long Island University.
Fresen, J. W. (2011). Factors influencing lecturer uptake of E-learning. Teaching English with Technology—Special Issue on LAMS and Learning Design, 11(1), 81–97.
Fogg, B. J., & Eckles, D. (2007). Mobile persuasion: 20 perspectives on the future of behavior change. Stanford, USA: Stanford Captology Media.
Gartner. (2020). Interpreting technology hype. Retrieved from https://www.gartner.com/en/research/methodologies/gartner-hype-cycle
Gelsomini, M. (2018). Reflex: Learning beyond the screen in a simple, fun, and affordable way. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3180302
Hallinger, P. (2013). A conceptual framework for systematic reviews of research in educational leadership and management. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 126–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311304670.
Hasselbring, T. S. (2001). A possible future of special education technology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16(4), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340101600403.
Henry, L. A. (2001). How does the severity of a learning disability affect working memory performance? Memory, 9(4–6), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210042000085.
Holz, H., Beuttler, B., & Ninaus, M. (2018). Design rationales of a mobile game-based intervention for German dyslexic children. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts, Melbourne, Australia. https://doi.org/10.1145/3270316.3272053
Jadán-Guerrero, J., & Guerrero, L. A. (2015). A virtual repository of learning objects to support literacy of SEN children. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 10(3), 168–174. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2015.2452712.
Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web-based instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(2), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290252934603.
Lane, K. L., Menzies, H. M., Oakes, W. P., & Kalberg, J. R. (2019). Developing a schoolwide framework to prevent and manage learning and behavior problems. New York: Guilford Press.
Lee, Y. L., Kwon, J., Kim, Y. T., & Shin, S.-J. (2015). Effects of an intelligent robot on number of words and length of sentences uttered by children with autism. Paper presented at the International Convention on Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology, Singapore. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/2846712.2846733
Leko, M. M. (2014). The value of qualitative methods in social validity research. Remedial and Special Education, 35(5), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514524002.
Levy, S., Kim, A.-H., & Olive, M. L. (2006). Interventions for young children with autism: A synthesis of the literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 21(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576060210010701.
Li, Q., & Ma, X. (2010). A meta-analysis of the effects of computer technology on school students’ mathematics learning. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 215–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9125-8.
Liu, G.-Z., Wu, N.-W., & Chen, Y.-W. (2013). Identifying emerging trends for implementing learning technology in special education: A state-of-the-art review of selected articles published in 2008–2012. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(10), 3618–3628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.07.007.
Lombardi, M. (2007). Authentic learning for the 21st Century: An overview. Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI3009.pdf
Marquis, S., McGrail, K., Hayes, M., & Tasker, S. (2018). Estimating the prevalence of children who have a developmental disability and live in the province of British Columbia. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 23(3), 46–56.
McConnell, M. E., Hilvitz, P. B., & Cox, C. J. (1998). Functional assessment: A systematic process for assessment and intervention in general and special education classrooms. Intervention in School and Clinic, 34(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/105345129803400102.
McLellan, H. (1996). Situated learning perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Publication Inc.
Moffatt, K., Findlater, L., & Allen, M. (2006). Generalizability in research with cognitively impaired individuals. Presented at the Workshop on Designing for People with Cognitive Impairments, ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), Montreal, Canada. Retrieved from https://faculty.washington.edu/leahkf/pubs/CHI2006_workshop_moffatt-1.pdf
Moore, A. H., Fowler, S. B., & Watson, C. E. (2007). Active learning and technology: Designing change for faculty, students, and institutions. EDUCAUSE Review, 42(5), 42–44.
Park, J., Kim, S., Kim, A., & Yi, M. Y. (2019). Learning to be better at the game: Performance vs. completion contingent reward for game-based learning. Computers & Education, 139, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.016.
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2007). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
Ronimus, M., Eklund, K., Pesu, L., & Lyytinen, H. (2019). Supporting struggling readers with digital game-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(3), 639–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09658-3.
Satterfield, B. (2016). History of assistive technology outcomes in education. Assistive Technology Outcomes & Benefits (ATOB), 10(1), 1–18.
Scheeler, M. C., & Lee, D. L. (2002). Using technology to deliver immediate corrective feedback to preservice teachers. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11(4), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021158805714.
Starcic, A. I., & Bagon, S. (2014). ICT-supported learning for inclusion of people with special needs: Review of seven educational technology journals, 1970–2011. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(2), 202–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12086.
Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Liu, T.-C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008.
The Association of Specialized Government and Cooperative Library Agencies (ASGCLA). (2018). Developmental, cognitive and intellectual disabilities. Retrieved from https://www.asgcladirect.org/resources/developmental-cognitive-and-intellectual-disabilities/
Vasalou, A., Khaled, R., Holmes, W., & Gooch, D. (2017). Digital games-based learning for children with dyslexia: A social constructivist perspective on engagement and learning during group game-play. Computers & Education, 114, 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.009.
Vasquez, E., & Straub, C. (2016). Online writing instruction for children with disabilities: A review of the empirical literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 32(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2014.951502.
Viera, A. J., & Garrett, J. M. (2005). Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa statistic. Family Medicine, 37(5), 360–363.
Virnes, M., Kärnä, E., & Vellonen, V. (2015). Review of research on children with autism spectrum disorder and the use of technology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 30(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341503000102.
Vogt, P., Dunk, S., & Poos, P. (2017). Foreign language tutoring for young adults with severe learning problems. Paper presented at the International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Vienna, Austria.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press.
WHO. (2019). Early child development. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/topics/early-child-development/en/
Zablotsky, B., Black, L. I., Maenner, M. J., Schieve, L. A., Danielson, M. L., Bitsko, R. H., et al. (2019). Prevalence and trends of developmental disabilities among children in the United States: 2009–2017. Pediatrics, 144(4), e20190811. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-0811.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest:
The authors declare that they have no financial conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Olakanmi, O.A., Akcayir, G., Ishola, O.M. et al. Using technology in special education: current practices and trends. Education Tech Research Dev 68, 1711–1738 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09795-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09795-0