Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transoral Approach for Odontoidectomy Efficacy and Safety

  • Surgical Technique
  • Published:
HSS Journal ®

Abstract

Background

Odontoid process pathologies can cause upper motor neuron lesions. These pathologies can be approached through either a high retropharyngeal approach or a transoral approach. The introduction of the surgical microscope, proper instrumentations, and proper antibiotics has increased utilization of the transoral approach.

Questions/Purposes

Our approach to anterior odontoid resection through transoral approach for different pathologies resulting in compression the cervical cord or causing craniocervical instability is described here. We aim to explore the safety and efficacy of this approach.

Methods

Twenty cases of different odontoid pathologies were managed by transoral surgery. Patients were assessed clinically for axial neck pain and radicular symptoms using visual analog scale. The Nurick score was used to get an overall functional evaluation of the difficulty of ambulation and walking. Radiological evaluation of the patients included plain radiographs, CT scans, and MRI of the cervical spine. Posterior surgery was done as a first stage for restoring the sagittal profile of the cervical spine. Transoral surgery was done as a second stage for odontoid resection and anterior decompression of the cord.

Results

Average follow-up was 29.4 ± 3.8 months. Mean preoperative Nurick scale was 1.3 ± 1.2. Mean postoperative Nurcik scale was 0.5 ± 0.61. Patients with axial neck pain were improved after surgery except the 6 patients; mean VAS preoperative 8.2 ± 2.3 SD, mean postoperative VAS 3.7 ± 0.8SD, and radicular symptoms were not significantly changed after surgery; gait changes were improved in all patients with preoperative gait disturbance.

Conclusion

The transoral approach is a safe and effective surgical method for the direct decompression of ventral midline extradural compressive disease of the craniovertebral junction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Mefty O, Borba LA, Aoki N, et al. The transcondylar approach to extradural nonneoplastic lesions of the craniovertebral junction. J Neurosurg. 1996; 84: 1-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Apuzzo ML, Weiss MH, Heiden JS. Transoral exposure of the atlantoaxial region. Neurosurgery. 1978; 3: 201-207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Balasingam V, Anderson GJ, Gross ND, et al. Anatomical analysis of transoral surgical approaches to the clivus. J Neurosurg. 2006; 105: 301-308. doi:10.3171/jns.2006.105.2.301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Crockard HA.The transoral approach to the base of the brain and upper cervical cord. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1985; 67(5):321-5.

  5. Crockard HA. Ventral approaches to the upper cervical spine. Orthopade. 1991; 20: 140-146.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Crockard HA. Transoral surgery some lessons learned. Br J Neurosurg. 1995; 9: 283-293.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Crockard HA, Calder I, Ransford AO. One-stage transoral decompression and posterior fixation in rheumatoid atlanto-axial subluxation. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1990; 72: 682-685.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Crockard HA, Essigman WK, Stevens JM, et al. Surgical treatment of cervical cord compression in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1985; 44(12): 809-816.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Crockard HA, Johnston F. Development of transoral approaches to lesions of the skull base and craniocervical junction. Neurosurg Q. 1993; 3: 61-82.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dickman CA, Apostolides PJ, Karahalios DG. Surgical techniques for upper cervical spine decompression and stabilization. Clin Neurosurg. 1997; 44: 137-160. PMID: 10080006, Review.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dickman CA, Apostolides PJ, Marciano FF: Transoral approach to the craniovertebral junction, in Zdeblick T (ed): Anterior Approaches to the Spine. St. Louis, Quality Medical Publishing. 2016; (in press).

  12. Dickman CA, Spetzler RF, Sonntag VKH, et al. Transoral approach to the craniovertebral junction. In: Dickman CA, Spetzler RF, Sonntag VKH, eds. Surgery of the craniovertebral junction. New York: Thieme; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bouramas D, Crockard A. Surgical techniques for the spine. Haher TR, Merola AA (Hrsg.), Surgical Techniques for the Spine (ISBN 3131247614) © 2003 Georg Thieme Verlag.

  14. Dziurzynski K, Anderson PA, Bean DB, et al. A blinded assessment of radiographic criteria for atlanto-occipital dislocation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(12): 1427-1432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fang HSY, Ong GB. Direct anterior approach to the upper cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1962; 44-A: 1588-1604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gladi M, Iacoangeli M, Specchia N, et al. Endoscopic transnasal odontoid resection to decompress the bulbo-medullary junction: a reliable anterior minimally invasive technique without posterior fusion. Eur Spine J. 2012; 21(Suppl 1): S55-S60. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2220-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hadley MN, Spetzler RF, Sonntag VK. The transoral approach to the superior cervical spine. A review of 53 cases of extradural cervicomedullary compression. J Neurosurg. 1989; 71(1): 16-23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Harris JP, Godin MS, Krekorian TD, et al. The transoropalatal approach to the atlanto-clival region: considerations of the head and neck surgeon. Laryngoscope. 1989; 99: 467-474.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. James D, Crockard HA. Surgical access to the base of skull and upper cervical spine by extended maxillotomy. Neurosurgery. 1991; 29(3):411–6.

  20. Kanavel AB. Bullet locked between atlas and the base of the skull: technique for removal through the mouth. Surg Clin. 1919; 1: 361-366.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Denaro L, D’Avella D, Longo UG, Denaro V. (Eds) Complications Related to Anterior Approaches. In Denaro L, D’Avella D, Denaro V. (Eds.) Pitfalls in Cervical Spine Surgery Avoidance and Management of Complications © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010. pp. 81–91.

  22. Masferrer R, Hadley MN, Bloomfield S, Spetzler RF, Sonntag VKH. Transoral microsurgical resection of the odontoid process. BNI Quarterly. 1(3):34–40, 1985.

  23. Menezes AH. Transoral approaches to the clivus and upper cervical spine. In: Menezes AH, Sonntag VKH, eds. Principles of spinal surgery. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Menezes AH. Tumors of the craniocervical junction. In: Menezes AH, Sonntag VKH, eds. Principles of spinal surgery. New York: McGraw Hill; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Menezes AH, Folz G. Transoral approach to the ventral craniocervical border. Oper Tech Neurosurg. 2008; 8: 150-157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Menezes AH, Traynelis VC, Gantz BJ. Surgical approaches to the craniovertebral junction. Clin Neurosurg. 1994; 41: 187-203.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Menezes AH, VanGilder JC. Transoral-transpharyngeal approach to the anterior craniocervical junction. Ten-year experience with 72 patients. J Neurosurg. 1988; 69: 895-903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Menezes AH, VanGilder JC, Graf CJ, et al. Craniocervical abnormalities. A comprehensive surgical approach. J Neurosurg. 1980; 53: 444-455.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mosberg WH Jr, Lippman EM. Anterior approach to the cervical vertebral bodies. Bull Sch Med Univ Md. 1960; 45: 10-17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pásztor E, Vajda J, Piffkó P, et al. Transoral surgery for craniocervical space occupying processes. J Neurosurg. 1984; 60: 276281. doi:10.3171/jns.1984.60.2.0276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Perrini P, Benedetto N, Guidi E, Di Lorenzo N. Transoral approach and its superior extensions to the craniovertebral junction malformations: surgical strategies and results. Neurosurgery. 2009; 64(5 Suppl 2):331–42. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000334430.25626.DC.

  32. Robinson RA, Southwick WO. Surgical approaches to the cervical spine. Instr Course Lect. 1960; 17: 299-330.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Scoville WB, Sherman IJ. Platybasia, report of 10 cases with comments on familial tendency, a special diagnostic sign, and the end results of operation. Ann Surg. 1951; 133: 496-502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Spetzler RF, Dickman CA, Sonntag VKH. The transoral approach to the anterior cervical spine. Contemp Neurosurg. 1991; 13: 1-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Spetzler RF, Hadley MN, Sonntag VK. The transoral approach to the anterior superior cervical spine. A review of 29 cases. Acta Neurochir. 1988; 43: 69-74. PMID: 3213660.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Spetzler RF, Selman WR, Nash CL Jr, et al. Transoral microsurgical odontoid resection and spinal cord monitoring. Spine. 1979; 4: 506-510.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Stevenson GC, Stoney RJ, Perkins RK, et al. A transcervical transclival approach to the ventral surface of the brain stem for removal of a clivus cordoma. J Neurosurg. 1966; 24: 544-551. doi:10.3171/jns.1966.24.2.0544.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Türe U, Pamir N. Extreme lateral-transatlas approach for resection of the dens of the axis. J Neurosurg (Spine 1). 2002; 96: 73-82. doi:10.3171/spi.2002.96.1.0073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tameem Mohamed Elkhateeb MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Ahmed Mohamed Elbadrawi, MD, and Tameem Mohamed Elkhateeb, MD, have declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Human/Animal Rights

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Required Author Forms

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the online version of this article.

Additional information

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Study Level IV

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 1224 kb)

ESM 2

(PDF 1224 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elbadrawi, A.M., Elkhateeb, T.M. Transoral Approach for Odontoidectomy Efficacy and Safety. HSS Jrnl 13, 276–281 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-016-9535-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-016-9535-3

Keywords

Navigation