Skip to main content
Log in

A Rawlsian defense of participation trophies

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Participation trophies in youth sports have become controversial in the so-called “culture wars” of recent years in Western countries. Conservative professional athletes and media pundits deride participation trophies, as they perceive them as akin to equality of outcome and Communist ideology. However, this is a mischaracterization of participation trophies, as liberalism can also provide a philosophical basis for a defense of these trophies. In this article, I rely on John Rawls’ contractual theory to build a defense of participation trophies. These prizes can serve as educational resources to teach young athletes about the dignity of losers in sports, and the need for taxation in order to sustain a safety net in society at large.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramitzky, R. (2011). Lessons from the kibbutz on the equality-incentives trade-off. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(1), 185–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atiyah, P. S. (1979). The rise and fall of freedom of contract (1 vol.). USA: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Avakiantz, A. (2020). Football, Fortnite, Fortune. Sports Law. J, 27, 195

    Google Scholar 

  • Benatar, S. R. (1997). Just healthcare beyond individualism: Challenges for North American bioethics. Cambridge Q. Healthcare Ethics, 6, 397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bidadanure, J. U. (2019). The political theory of universal basic income. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 481–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, A. (2010). Positive rights, negative rights and health care. Journal of medical ethics, 36(12), 838–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, R., & Schneider, A. (1998). Fair play as respect for the game. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 25(1), 1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, A. L. (1930). Contracts for the Benefit of Third Persons. LQ Rev, 46, 12

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, N. (2015). A moral critique of mixed martial arts. Public affairs quarterly, 29(4), 365–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1999). Caution–Praise Can Be Dangerous. American Educator, 23(1), 4–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckler, P., Worsowicz, G., & Rayburn, J. (2010). Social media and healthcare: an overview. PM&R, 2(11), 1046–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekins, E. (2014). 57% of Americans Say Only Kids Who Win Should Get Trophies. Reason Rupe Poll, 19

  • English, C. (2018). Rewarding Participation in Youth Sport: Beyond Trophies for Winning.(Premiando la participación en el deporte para jóvenes: más allá de los trofeos por ganar). Cultura, Ciencia y Deporte, 13(38), 109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, D. J. (2014). The sports gene: Inside the science of extraordinary athletic performance. New York: Penguin

    Google Scholar 

  • Grand, D., & Goldberg, A. (2011). This is Your Brain on Sports: beating blocks, slumps and performance anxiety for good!. Dog Ear Publishing

  • Hall, E. V., & Livingston, R. W. (2012). The hubris penalty: Biased responses to “Celebration” displays of black football players. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 899–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, J. (2005). Rawls on global distributive justice: A defence. Canadian journal of philosophy, 35(sup1), 193–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. H., & Kantarjian, H. (2015). Health care in the United States—basic human right or entitlement? Annals of Oncology, 26(10), 2193–2195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchler, E. (1997). The burden of new taxes: acceptance of taxes as a function of affectedness and egoistic versus altruistic orientation. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 26(4), 421–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1967). Two Treatises of Government: A Critical Ed. with an Introd. and Apparatus Criticus. 2d Ed. Cambridge University Press

  • Marx, K. (2008). Critique of the Gotha program. New York: Wildside Press LLC

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, R. D. (2015). The political philosophy of Rousseau. New York: Princeton University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mizrahi, M. (2014). The problem of natural inequality: A new problem of evil. Philosophia, 42(1), 127–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (2004). The fair trade movement: Parameters, issues and future research. Journal of business ethics, 53(1), 73–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muldoon, R. (2016). Social contract theory for a diverse world: Beyond tolerance. Taylor & Francis

  • Papadimos, T. J. (2007). Healthcare access as a right, not a privilege: a construct of Western thought. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 2(1), 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peeters, T., & Szymanski, S. (2014). Financial fair play in European football. Economic Policy, 29(78), 343–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1968). Distributive justice: some addenda. Natural Law Forum, 13, 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, K. A. (2011). Debunking Glenn Beck: How to save America from media pundits and propagandists. ABC-CLIO

  • Salinas, S., & Fedynich, L. (2018). Empty $ eats. Journal of Arts and Humanities, 7(6), 36–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M. J. (2010). Justice: What’s the right thing to do?. New York: Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowell, T. (2001). The quest for cosmic justice. Simon and Schuster

  • Stein, J. (2013). Millennials: The me me me generation. Time magazine, 20, 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift, A. (2005). Justice, Luck and the Family. Princeton: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel Andrade.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare no conflict of interest

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Andrade, G. A Rawlsian defense of participation trophies. Philosophia 51, 19–32 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-022-00515-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-022-00515-x

Keywords

Navigation