Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study is to test the Subcategory Assessment Method (SAM) by applying it to a real product (Natura’s cocoa soap).
Methods
The case study was performed by first following the four phases of Social Life Cycle Assessment and by considering a functional unit to support the cleaning baths of a person over 1 year, which resulted in a reference flow for 10 cocoa soaps that weighed 150 g each. A cradle to gate life cycle assessment was undertaken, and then, SAM was applied.
Results and discussion
The results showed that SAM can support the evaluation of subcategories and stakeholders along the life cycle by providing a social profile of the organisations involved. The case study revealed the processes with better performance: the cultivation and production of palm oil, cocoa butter production/final picking and logistics. The worst social profile was found in the cocoa cultivation process, which was provided by a small organisation (a cooperative). In fact, the results showed that applying SAM in small organisations does not reflect the social behaviours of the organisations because the basic requirements are based on international references, which typically involve activities that are difficult to find in small and family organisations. Moreover, the magnitude of positive actions does not affect the assessment.
Conclusions
Applying SAM indeed enabled the stages to be identified in which the subcategories’ basic requirements, which highlight strengths and weaknesses, have or have not been met. Nevertheless, SAM must be improved for small organisations and for the magnitude of positive actions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Natura (2010) Relatório Anual Natura 2010. http://natura.infoinvest.com.br/ptb/s-15-ptb.html. Accessed 08 November 2011
Penske (2008) Executive summary and regional comparisons http://www.gopenske.com/pdfs/2008_3pl_exec_summary.pdf. Accessed 19 July 2012
Ramirez PKS, Petti L, Haberland NT, Ugaya CML (2014) Subcategory assessment method for social life cycle assessment. Part 1: methodological framework. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:1515–1523
Ugaya C M L, Correa S (2011) Relatório Screning do Projeto Sócrates: Avaliação Social do Ciclo de Vida do Sabonete em Barra Ekos Cacau (Maracatu) da Natura
Ugaya CML, Brones F, Correa S (2011) S-LCA: preliminary results of Natura’s cocoa soap bar. In: Life Cycle Management Conference LCM 2011, Berlin. Towards life cycle sustainability Management. Proceedings do LCM 2011
UNEP and SETAC (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products, United Nations Environment Program, Paris SETAC Life Cycle Initiative United Nations Environment Programme
UNEP and SETAC (2010) Methodological sheets of sub-categories of impact for a Social LCA. http://lcinitiative.unep.fr. Accessed 4 October 2011
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the UNEP and SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, especially the Task Force on Including Social Aspects in LCA, Nara Tudela Haberland, who provided valuable comments that helped improve this paper, as well the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) and Natura for their financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Marzia Traverso
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(PDF 176 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ramirez, P.K.S., Petti, L., Brones, F. et al. Subcategory assessment method for social life cycle assessment. Part 2: application in Natura’s cocoa soap. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21, 106–117 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0964-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0964-x