Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Green fiscal policy and enterprise green innovation: evidence from quasi-natural experiment of China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We aim to study the impact of green fiscal policy on enterprise green innovation by applying a time-varying difference-in-difference (DID) model, and treat the comprehensive demonstration city of fiscal policy for energy conservation and emission reduction (CPEE) in China as a quasi-natural experiment. The results show that the CPEE can significantly improve enterprise’s green innovation performance of pilot area. This net policy effect is valid after a series of robustness tests to control for various potential confounding factors. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the effect of CPEE is stronger for state-owned enterprises and enterprises in high energy consumption industries or industries with higher industrial concentration. In addition, the effect of CPEE is various among different categories of green patents, which is stronger for the types of alternative energy production category, waste management category, administrative supervision and design category. The mechanism test indicates that the CPEE can improve the green innovation performance by increasing enterprise’ investment in research and development, promoting territorial industrial transformation and upgrading, and enhancing enterprise executives’ environmental awareness. To achieve the carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals, the green enabling role of fiscal reform pilot policy in transition economies and the applicability of localized policies should be excavated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

References

  • Adams R, Jeanrenaud S, Bessant J, Denyer D, Overy P (2016) Sustainability-oriented innovation: A systematic review. Int J Manag Rev 18(2):180–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrone P, Fosfuri A, Gelabert L, Gomez-Mejia LR (2013) Necessity as the mother of ‘green’inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations. Strateg Manag J 34(8):891–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao C, Tong X, Chen Y, Zhang Y (2022) How top management’s environmental awareness affect corporate green competitive advantage: evidence from China. Kybernetes 51(3):1250–1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang K, Wan Q, Lou Q, Chen Y, Wang W (2020) Green fiscal policy and firms’ investment efficiency: New insights into firm-level panel data from the renewable energy industry in China. Renew Energy 151:589–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Huang Z, Drakeford BM, Failler P (2019) Lending interest rate, loaning scale, and government subsidy scale in green innovation. Energies 12(23):4431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YS (2008) The positive effect of green intellectual capital on competitive advantages of firms. J Bus Ethics 77:271–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YS, Lai SB, Wen CT (2006) The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. J Bus Ethics 67:331–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eiadat Y, Kelly A, Roche F, Eyadat H (2008) Green and competitive? An empirical test of the mediating role of environmental innovation strategy. J World Bus 43(2):131–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster C, Green K (2000) Greening the innovation process. Bus Strateg Environ 9(5):287–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman J, Korsunova A, Halme M (2017) Our collaborative future: activities and roles of stakeholders in sustainability-oriented innovation. Bus Strateg Environ 26(6):731–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gramkow C, Anger-Kraavi A (2018) Could fiscal policies induce green innovation in developing countries? The case of Brazilian manufacturing sectors. Clim Pol 18(2):246–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart SL (1995) A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Acad Manage Rev 20(4):986–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Q, Chen X, Zhou M, Zhang X, Duan L (2019) How does CEO’s environmental awareness affect technological innovation? Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(2):261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones B (2011) Driving a green economy through public finance and fiscal policy reform. J Int Econ Commer Policy 2(02):325–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanoie P, Patry M, Lajeunesse R (2008) Environmental regulation and productivity: Testing the porter hypothesis. J Prod Anal 30:121–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li D, Zeng T (2020) Are China’s intensive pollution industries greening? An analysis based on green innovation efficiency. J Clean Prod 259:120901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Mai Q, Chen X (2022) The province-managing-county reform and green innovation of enterprises: Evidence from the quasi-natural experiment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(59):88823–88838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Wang Y (2023) Green innovation effect of pilot zones for green finance reform: evidence of quasi natural experiment. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 186:122079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin R, Wagner U (2009) Econometric analysis of the impacts of the UK climate change levy and climate change agreements on firms’ fuel use and innovation activity. In: Contribution to the OECD project on Taxation, Innovation and the Environment, vol 33

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne JE, Andersen MS (eds) (2012) Handbook of research on environmental taxation. Edward Elgar Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Peattie K, Charter M (1992) Green marketing. The Marketing Book, p 726

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng X, Liu Y (2016) Behind eco-innovation: managerial environmental awareness and external resource acquisition. J Clean Prod 139:347–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Linde CVD (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9(4):97–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seebode D, Jeanrenaud S, Bessant J (2012) Managing innovation for sustainability. R&D Manag 42(3):195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shmelev SE, Speck SU (2018) Green fiscal reform in Sweden: econometric assessment of the carbon and energy taxation scheme. Renew Sust Energ Rev 90:969–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Yu S, Li M, Cheng Y, Wang C (2022a) Study of the impact of industrial restructuring on the spatial and temporal evolution of carbon emission intensity in Chinese provinces—analysis of mediating effects based on technological innovation. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(20):13401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Zeng T, Li C (2022b) Behavior decision of top management team and enterprise green technology innovation. J Clean Prod 367:133120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang P, Bu H, Liu F (2022c) Internal control and enterprise green innovation. Energies 15(6):2193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicki S, Hansen EG (2019) Green technology innovation: anatomy of exploration processes from a learning perspective. Bus Strateg Environ 28(6):970–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong Z, Chen A, Shen C, Wu D (2022) Fiscal policy and the development of green transportation infrastructure: the case of China’s high-speed railways. Econ Chang Restruct 55(4):2179–2213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xepapadeas A, de Zeeuw A (1999) Environmental policy and competitiveness: the Porter hypothesis and the composition of capital. J Environ Econ Manag 37(2):165–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue F, Cheng X (2022) Carbon emission reduction effect of green fiscal policy: evidence from “Comprehensive Demonstration City of fiscal policy for energy conservation and emission Reduction”. J Financ Econ 48(07):79–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang G, Liu B (2021) Research on the impact of managers’ green environmental awareness and strategic intelligence on corporate green product innovation strategic performance. Ann Oper Res 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04243-5

  • Zhao L, Zhang Y, Sadiq M, Hieu VM, Ngo TQ (2021) Testing green fiscal policies for green investment, innovation and green productivity amid the COVID-19 era. Econ Chang Restruct 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-021-09367-z

  • Zhu B, Zhang M, Zhou Y, Wang P, Sheng J, He K et al (2019) Exploring the effect of industrial structure adjustment on interprovincial green development efficiency in China: A novel integrated approach. Energy Policy 134:110946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu X (2022) Have carbon emissions been reduced due to the upgrading of industrial structure? Analysis of the mediating effect based on technological innovation. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 29(36):54890–54901

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research work is supported in part by grants from the 2022 Annual Program of Philosophy and Social Sciences Planning of Guangdong Province (GD22YYJ16), the 2022 Project of the 14th Five Year Plan for the Development of Philosophy and Social Sciences in Guangzhou (2022GZQN06), Guangdong Provincial Financial Research Project “Research on the Connection of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao’s Financial and Tax Systems” (2023GDCZ017), Key Topics of Foshan Social Science Planning “Creating a First-class Business Environment and Implementing Precise Investment Attraction in the Industrial Chain” (2023-ZDB02) and “Promoting the Stable Scale and Optimal Structure of Foshan’s Foreign Trade” (2023-ZDB05), Guangdong Province Innovation Training Project “Spatial Layout of Digital Service Industry and Upgrading of China’s Manufacturing Value Chain: Coordination or Disharmony”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: conceptualization, S.L., P.J.X., and X.C.; methodology, P.J.X, S.L.; software, P.J.X; formal analysis, S.L., P.J.X. and X.C.; investigation, S.L., P.J.X. and X.C.; writing—original draft preparation, H.Z., S.L.; writing—review and editing, S.L., P.J.X. and X.C.; visualization, P.J.X.; supervision, S.L., P.J.X.; funding acquisition, S.L.. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiuying Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, ., Xu, P. & Chen, X. Green fiscal policy and enterprise green innovation: evidence from quasi-natural experiment of China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 94576–94593 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28847-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28847-5

Keywords

Navigation