Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A bibliometric analysis of ecosystem services evaluation from 1997 to 2016

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ecosystems play critically important roles in supporting human society, while human activities seriously disturb their initial balance. Lots of researches on ecosystem services are conducted due to the increasing concern on ecological security worldwide. In order to provide valuable insights for understanding the primary performance of ecosystem services–related studies, a qualitative and quantitative analysis by using a bibliometric tool is performed in this study. Journal impact factor, CiteScore, and h-index are used for identifying influential journals, while h-index is used for recognizing productive countries/territories and institutions. Social network analysis of countries/territories and institutions is visualized, respectively, so that relationships among them can be uncovered. Citation analysis of publications and co-occurrence analysis of high-frequency keywords are also performed to explore hotspots and popular methods in this field. This study uncovers a holistic picture on the primary performance of ecosystem services–related literatures published from 1997 to 2016, including journals, countries/territories, and institutions. Results find that forest, agriculture, and wetland ecosystems attract lots of attention. Finally, major methods used for ecosystem services evaluation are identified and discussed. Research outcomes will provide valuable insights to stakeholders interested in ecosystem services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen KE, Moore R (2016) Moving beyond the exchange value in the nonmarket valuation of ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 18:78–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier EB, Hacker SD, Kennedy C, Koch EW, Stier AC, Silliman BR (2011) The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol Monogr 81:169–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg CE, Mineau MM, Rogers SH (2016) Examining the ecosystem service of nutrient removal in a coastal watershed. Ecosyst Serv 20:104–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Braat LC, de Groot R (2012) The ecosystem services agenda: bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy. Ecosyst Serv 1:4–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent CD, Brookshire DS, Goodrich D, Dixon MD, Brand LA, Thacher J et al (2015) Valuing preservation and restoration alternatives for ecosystem services in the southwestern USA. Ecohydrology 8:851–862

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JM (2008) Opportunity cost. In: Palgrave Macmillan (ed) The new Palgrave dictionary of economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson RT (2000) Contingent valuation: a user’s guide. Environ Sci Technol 34:1413–1418

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cavender-Bares J, Polasky S, King E, Balvanera P (2015) A sustainability framework for assessing trade-offs in ecosystem services. Ecol Soc 20:17

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen NW, Li HC, Wang LH (2009) A GIS-based approach for mapping direct use value of ecosystem services at a county scale: management implications. Ecol Econ 68:2768–2776

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen ZX, Zhang XS (2000) Value of ecosystem services in China. Chin Sci Bull 45:870–876

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Liu WJ, Geng Y, Brown MT, Gao CX, Wu R (2017) Recent progress on emergy research: a bibliometric analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 73:1051–1060

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B et al (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, de Groot R, Braat L, Kubiszewski I, Fioramonti I, Sutton P (2017) Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosyst Serv 28:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, van der Ploeg S, Anderson SJ, Kubiszewski I (2014) Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob Environ Chang 26:152–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouzat E, Mouchet M, Turkelboom F, Byczek C, Meersmans J, Berger F et al (2015) Assessing bundles of ecosystem services from regional to landscape scale: insights from the French Alps. J Appl Ecol 52:1145–1155

    Google Scholar 

  • Czúcz B, Arany I, Potschin-Young M, Bereczki K, Kertész M, Kiss M (2018) Where concepts meet the real world: a systematic review of ecosystem service indicators and their classification using CICES. Ecosyst Serv 29:145–157

    Google Scholar 

  • da Silva JAT, Memon AR (2017) CiteScore: a cite for sore eyes, or a valuable, transparent metric? Scientometrics 111:553–556

    Google Scholar 

  • de Groot R, Brander L, Van Der Ploeg S, Costanza R, Bernard F, Braat L (2012) Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosyst Serv 1:50–61

    Google Scholar 

  • de Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41:393–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Egoh B, Reyers B, Rouget M, Richardson DM, Le Maitre DC, van Jaarsveld AS (2008) Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management. Agric Ecosyst Environ 127:135–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernstson H, Sörlin S (2013) Ecosystem services as technology of globalization: on articulating values in urban nature. Ecol Econ 86:274–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Favretto N, Stringer LC, Dougill AJ, Dallimer M, Perkins JS, Reed MS (2016) Multi-criteria decision analysis to identify dryland ecosystem service trade-offs under different rangeland land uses. Ecosyst Serv 17:142–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer A, Eastwood A (2016) Coproduction of ecosystem services as human–nature interactions—an analytical framework. Land Use Policy 52:41–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzese PP, Buonocore E, Donnarumma L, Russo GF (2017) Natural capital accounting in marine protected areas: the case of the islands of Ventotene and S. Stefano (Central Italy). Ecol Model 360:290–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao CX, Sun M, Geng Y, Wu R, Chen W (2016) A bibliometric analysis based review on wind power price. Appl Energy 182:602–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Geng Y, Chen W, Liu Z, Chiu ASF, Han WY, Liu ZQ (2017) A bibliometric review: energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in the residential sector. J Clean Prod 159:301–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Geng Y, Sarkis J, Ulgiati S, Zhang P (2013) Measuring China’s circular economy. Science 339:1526–1527

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Baggethun E, de Groot R, Lomas PL, Montes C (2010) The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecol Econ 69:1209–1218

    Google Scholar 

  • Górriz-Mifsud E, Varela E, Piqué M, Prokofieva I (2016) Demand and supply of ecosystem services in a Mediterranean forest: computing payment boundaries. Ecosyst Serv 17:53–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardiess G, Meilinger T, Mallot HA, 2015. The international encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. Elsevier

  • Hanley N, MacMillan D, Wright RE, Bullock C, Simpson I, Parsisson D et al (1998) Contingent valuation versus choice experiments: estimating the benefits of environmentally sensitive areas in Scotland. J Agric Econ 49:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser S, Meixler MS, Laba M (2015) Quantification of impacts and ecosystem services loss in New Jersey coastal wetlands due to hurricane sandy storm surge. Wetlands 35:1137–1148

    Google Scholar 

  • Häyhä T, Franzese PP (2014) Ecosystem services assessment: a review under an ecological-economic and systems perspective. Ecol Model 289:124–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingraham MW, Foster SG (2008) The value of ecosystem services provided by the US National Wildlife Refuge System in the contiguous US. Ecol Econ 67:608–618

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins WA, Murray BC, Kramer RA, Faulkner SP (2010) Valuing ecosystem services from wetlands restoration in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley. Ecol Econ 69:1051–1061

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang W (2017) Ecosystem services research in China: a critical review. Ecosyst Serv 26:10–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones L, Norton L, Austin Z, Browne AL, Donovan D, Emmett BA et al (2016) Stocks and flows of natural and human-derived capital in ecosystem services. Land Use Policy 52:151–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim ES, Yoon DY, Kim HJ, Jeon HJ, Lee JY, Cho BM et al (2016) Citation classics in neurointerventional research: a bibliometric analysis of the 100 most cited articles. J NeuroInterv Surg 0:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoche S, Lupi F (2007) Valuing deer hunting ecosystem services from farm landscapes. Ecol Econ 64:313–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremen C (2005) Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology? Ecol Lett 8:468–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindhjem H, Grimsrud K, Navrud S, Kolle SO (2015) The social benefits and costs of preserving forest biodiversity and ecosystem services. J Environ Econ Policy 4:202–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Costanza R, Troy A, D'Aagostino J, Mates W (2010) Valuing New Jersey’s ecosystem services and natural capital: a spatially explicit benefit transfer approach. Environ Manag 45:1271–1285

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu YB (2014) Dynamic evaluation on ecosystem service values of urban rivers and lakes: a case study of Nanchang City, China. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manag 17:161–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín-López B, Gómez-Baggethun E, García-Llorente M, Montes C (2014) Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. Ecol Indic 37:220–228

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough K, Hutchinson S, Moore T, Hutchinson JMS (2017) Analysis of publication trends in ecosystem services research. Ecosyst Serv 25:82–88

    Google Scholar 

  • McInnes R, Smith G, Greaves J, Watson D, Wood N, Everard M (2016) Multicriteria decision analysis for the evaluation of water quality improvement and ecosystem service provision. Water Environ J 30:298–309

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin DL, Cohen MJ (2013) Realizing ecosystem services: wetland hydrologic function along a gradient of ecosystem condition. Ecol Appl 23:1619–1631

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) (2005) Ecosystem and human well-being: general synthesis. World Resource Institute, Washington <http://millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf> [accessed 1 April 2020]

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulatu DW, van der Veen A, van Oel PR (2014) Farm households’ preferences for collective and individual actions to improve water-related ecosystem services: the Lake Naivasha basin, Kenya. Ecosyst Serv 7:22–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum HT (1996) Environmental accounting: Emergy and environmental decision making. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons GR (2003) The travel cost model. In: A primer on nonmarket valuation. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 269–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto R, Brouwer R, Patrício J, Abreu P, Marta-Pedroso C, Baeta A et al (2016) Valuing the non-market benefits of estuarine ecosystem services in a river basin context: testing sensitivity to scope and scale. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 169:95–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Polasky S, Tallis H, Reyers B (2015) Setting the bar: standards for ecosystem services. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:7356–7361

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Radford KG, James P (2013) Changes in the value of ecosystem services along a rural-urban gradient: a case study of greater Manchester, UK. Landsc Urban Plan 10:117–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond A, Kaufmann RK, Myneni RB (2007) Valuing ecosystem services: a shadow price for net primary production. Ecol Econ 64:454–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson R (1993) Cost-benefit analysis. BMJ 307:924–926

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saarikoski H, Mustajoki J, Barton DN, Geneletti D, Langemeyer J, Gomez-Baggethun E (2016) Multi-criteria decision analysis and cost-benefit analysis: comparing alternative frameworks for integrated valuation of ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 22:238–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassone PG, Schaffer WA (1978) Cost-benefit analysis: a handbook. Academic, New York, p 1978

    Google Scholar 

  • Seppelt R, Dormann CF, Eppink FV, Lautenbach S, Schmidt S (2011) A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. J Appl Ecol 48:630–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Syrbe RU, Walz U (2012) Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecol Indic 21:80–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Triantaphyllou E, Shu B, Sanchez SN, Ray T (1998) Multi-criteria decision making: an operations research approach. Encycl Electr Electron Eng 15:175–186

    Google Scholar 

  • van Berkel DB, Verburg PH (2014) Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape. Ecol Indic 37:163–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh JR, Carpenter SR, Vander Zanden MJ (2016) Invasive species triggers a massive loss of ecosystem services through a trophic cascade. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:4081–4085

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wegner G, Pascual U (2011) Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human well-being: a multidisciplinary critique. Glob Environ Chang 21:492–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie G, Zhang C, Zhen L, Zhang L (2017) Dynamic changes in the value of China’s ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 26:146–154

  • Yang W, Yang Z (2014) Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into environmental flows decisions for Baiyangdian Lake. Ecol Eng 71:539–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Zank B, Bagstad KJ, Voigt B, Villa F (2016) Modeling the effects of urban expansion on natural capital stocks and ecosystem service flows: a case study in the Puget Sound, Washington, USA. Landsc Urban Plan 149:31–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao CX, Jiang CM, Zhou L, Li S, Rao LL, Zheng R (2015) The hidden opportunity cost of time effect on intertemporal choice. Front Psychol 6:311

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao S, Wu C (2015) Valuation of mangrove ecosystem services based on emergy: a case study in China. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:967–974

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong SZ, Geng Y, Liu WJ, Gao CX, Chen W (2016) A bibliometric review on natural resource accounting during 1995-2014. J Clean Prod 139:122–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Zijlstra H, McCullough R, 2016. CiteScore: a new metric to help you track journal performance and make decisions. Accessed at: <https://www.elsevier.com/editors-update/story/journal-metrics/citescore-a-new-metric-to-help-you-choose-the-right-journal> [accessed 1 April 2020].

Download references

Funding

This study is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 71810107001 and 71690241).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, 250358, People’s Republic of China

    Wei Chen

  2. School of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, People’s Republic of China

    Yong Geng

  3. China Institute of Urban Governance, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, People’s Republic of China

    Yong Geng

  4. Western China Economic Research Center, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, 611130, People’s Republic of China

    Shaozhuo Zhong

  5. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, People’s Republic of China

    Mufan Zhuang & Hengyu Pan

Authors
  1. Wei Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yong Geng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shaozhuo Zhong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mufan Zhuang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hengyu Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wei Chen or Yong Geng.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOC 207 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, W., Geng, Y., Zhong, S. et al. A bibliometric analysis of ecosystem services evaluation from 1997 to 2016. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 23503–23513 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08760-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08760-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation