Skip to main content
Log in

Carbon-to-nitrogen ratio influence on the performance of bioretention for wastewater treatment

  • Resource Recovery from Wastewater, Solid Waste and Waste Gas: Engineering and Management Aspects
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bioretention cell (BRC), bioretention cell with microbial fuel cell (BRC-MFC), and an enhanced combined BRC-MFC system with bimetallic zero-valent iron (BRC-MFC-BZVI) were implemented in current study to treat the domestic wastewater. Nitrogen removal characteristics of three systems were investigated by adjusting influent carbon/nitrogen ratio (C/N ratio of 2.54–19.36). Results revealed that the nitrification and denitrification performances were mainly influenced by organic matter and system combination, which further affected nitrogen removal. When the influent C/N ratio was between 2 to 3, compared with BRC system, in BRC-MFC and BRC-MFC-BZVI system, chemical oxygen demand (COD), total nitrogen (TN), and ammonical nitrogen (NH4+-N) removal efficiencies were still reached to 83.04%, 61.06%, and 42.26% and 86.53%, 43.61%, and 50.99% respectively, which simultaneously achieved high-efficiency of organic matter and nitrogen removal. The efficient supply of electrons in the BRC-MFC and BRC-MFC-BZVI processes was the main reason to achieve profound denitrification removal under the condition of low C/N. Removal rates of nitrate (NO3−N) and nitrite (NO2−N) were relatively higher due to microbial-driven redox reactions caused by driving electrons to flow in the closed circuit of metal wire connection. Moreover, phylogenetic diversity of bacterial communities mainly induced the catalytic iron, which further enhanced biological nitrogen reduction. The maximum efficient removal of organic matter (OM), TN, and NH4 + −N were obtained in the BRC-MFC-BZVI system, which were 98.42% (C/N = 10.42), 55.61% (C/N = 4.16), and 61.13% (C/N = 4.16), respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aelterman P, Rabaey K, Pham HT, Boon N, Verstraete W (2006) Continuous electricity generation at high voltages and currents using stacked microbial fuel cells. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40(10):3388–3394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernet N, Dangcong P, Delgenes JP, Moletta R (2001) Nitrification at low oxygen concentration in biofilm reactor. J Environ Eng 127(3):266–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cao G, Wang S, Peng Y, Miao Z (2013) Biological nutrient removal by applying modified four step-feed technology to treat weak wastewater. Bioresour Technol 128(1):604–611

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Çeçen F, Özgür A (2011) Activated carbon for water and wastewater treatment: integration of adsorption and biological treatment. J Korea Soc Comp Info 19(11):43–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatt BE, Fletcher TD, Deletic A (2008) Hydraulic and pollutant removal performance of fine media stormwater filtration systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42(7):2535–2541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang CP, Wang HW, Chiu PC (1998) Nitrate reduction by metallic iron. Water Res 32(8):2257–2264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Lawler DF (2012) The influence of hydraulic loads on depth filtration. Water Res 46(2):433–441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma L, Zhang WX (2008) Enhanced biological treatment of industrial wastewater with bimetallic zero-valent iron. Environ Sci Technol 42(15):5384–5389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Madigan Michael T., Martinko John M., Stahl David A., Clark David P. 2010. Brock biology of microorganisms. 13th ed. Benjamin Cummings, San Francisco, CA 94111, USA. Pp. 704

  • Miao Z, Yong-zhen P, Jian-hua Z, Wang C, Wang S-y, Wei Z (2016) Effect of influent C/N ratios on denitrifying phosphorus removal characteristics in the A2/O-BCO process. China environ. Sci. 36(5):1366–1375

    Google Scholar 

  • Oon YL, Ong SA, Ho LN, Wong YS, Dahalan FA, Oon YS et al (2015) Synergistic effect of up-flow constructed wetland and microbial fuel cell for simultaneous wastewater treatment and energy recovery. Bioresour Technol 203:190–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne EGI, Fletcher TD, Cook PLM, Deletic A, Hatt BE (2014a) Processes and drivers of nitrogen removal in stormwater biofiltration. Crit Rev Env Sci Tech 44(7):796–846

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Payne EGI, Fletcher TD, Russell DG, Grace MR, Cavagnaro TR et al (2014b) Temporary storage or permanent removal? The division of nitrogen between biotic assimilation and denitrification in stormwater biofiltration systems. PLoS One 9(3):e90890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne EGI, Hatt BE, Deletic A et al (2015) Adoption guidelines for stormwater biofiltration systems. Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Revil A, Mendonça CA, Atekwana EA et al (2015) Understanding biogeobatteries: where geophysics meets microbiology. JGR Biogeosciences 115(G1):379–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittmann BE, Mccarty PL (2002) Environmental biotechnology: principles and applications. McGraw-Hill, p 497

  • Ruiz G, Jeison D, Chamy R (2006) Development of denitrifying and methanogenic activities in USB reactors for the treatment of wastewater: effect of cod/n ratio. Process Biochem 41(6):1338–1342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sevda S, Sreekrishnan TR, Pous N et al (2018) Bioelectroremediation of perchlorate and nitrate contaminated water: a review. Bioresour Technol 255:331–339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava P, Yadav AK, Mishra BK (2015) The effects of microbial fuel cell integration into constructed wetland on the performance of constructed wetland. Bioresour Technol 195:223–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Standard Method for the Examination of Water and Wastewater Editorial Board (2002) Standard method for the examination of water and wastewater. Environmental Science Press of China, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei J, Liang P, Cao X, Huang X (2011) Use of inexpensive semi coke and activated carbon as biocathode in microbial fuel cells. Bioresour Technol 102(22):10431–10435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Zhang J, Jia W, Xie H, Gu RR, Li C, Gao B (2009) Impact of cod/n ratio on nitrous oxide emission from microcosm wetlands and their performance in removing nitrogen from wastewater. Bioresour Technol 100(12):2910–2917

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Zhang WX (2000) Subcolloidal Fe/Ag particles for reductive dehalogenation of chlorinated benzenes. Ind Eng Chem Res 39(7):2238–2244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang K, Randjelkovic A, McCarthy DT, Page D, Deletic A (2014) The validation of stormwater biofilters for micropollutant removal using in-situ challenge tests. Ecol Engi 67(6):1–10

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was co-funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41967043), Key technology Program of Gansu province (No. JK2018-16), the National Key Technologies R&D Program (No. 2015BAL02B05), the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51550110231).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dafang Fu.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Gerald Thouand

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Singh, R.P., Geng, C. et al. Carbon-to-nitrogen ratio influence on the performance of bioretention for wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 17652–17660 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07438-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07438-3

Keywords

Navigation