Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Performance modeling and valuation of snow-covered PV systems: examination of a simplified approach to decrease forecasting error

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The advent of modern solar energy technologies can improve the costs of energy consumption on a global, national, and regional level, ultimately spanning stakeholders from governmental entities to utility companies, corporations, and residential homeowners. For those stakeholders experiencing the four seasons, accurately accounting for snow-related energy losses is important for effectively predicting photovoltaic performance energy generation and valuation. This paper provides an examination of a new, simplified approach to decrease snow-related forecasting error, in comparison to current solar energy performance models. A new method is proposed to allow model designers, and ultimately users, the opportunity to better understand the return on investment for solar energy systems located in snowy environments. The new method is validated using two different sets of solar energy systems located near Green Bay, WI, USA: a 3.0-kW micro inverter system and a 13.2-kW central inverter system. Both systems were unobstructed, facing south, and set at a tilt of 26.56°. Data were collected beginning in May 2014 (micro inverter system) and October 2014 (central inverter system), through January 2018. In comparison to reference industry standard solar energy prediction applications (PVWatts and PVsyst), the new method results in lower mean absolute percent errors per kilowatt hour of 0.039 and 0.055%, respectively, for the micro inverter system and central inverter system. The statistical analysis provides support for incorporating this new method into freely available, online, up-to-date prediction applications, such as PVWatts and PVsyst.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews RW, Pearce JM (2012) Prediction of energy effects on photovoltaic systems due to snowfall events. In: Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 2012 38th IEEE. IEEE, pp 003386–003391

  • Andrews RW, Pearce JM (2013) The effect of spectral albedo on amorphous silicon and crystalline silicon solar photovoltaic device performance. Sol Energy 91:233–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2013.01.030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews RW, Pollard A, Pearce JM (2013) The effects of snowfall on solar photovoltaic performance. Sol Energy 92:84–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2013.02.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azimoh CL, Wallin F, Karlsson B (2014) An assessment of unforeseen losses resulting from inappropriate use of solar home systems in South Africa. Appl Energy 136:336–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonkaney AL, Madougou S, Adamou R (2017) Impacts of cloud cover and dust on the performance of photovoltaic module in Niamey. J Renew Energy 2017:9107502, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9107502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosman L (2014) A decision support system to analyze, predict, and evaluate solar energy system performance: PVSysCO (photovoltaic System Comparison). Theses and Dissertations. 666. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/666

  • Brennan MP, Abramase AL, Andrews RW, Pearce JM (2014) Effects of spectral albedo on solar photovoltaic devices. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 124:111–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2014.01.046

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clean Energy Decision Support Centre (2004) Clean energy project analysis: RETScreen engineering and cases textbook. Natural Resources Canada

  • Clean Energy Decision Support Centre (2005) RETScreen software online user manual photovoltaic project model. Natural Resources Canada

  • Darling S, You F (2013) The case for organic photovoltaics. RSC Adv 3:17633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Darling S, You F, Veselka T, Velosa A (2011) Assumptions and the levelized cost of energy for photovoltaics. Energy Environ Sci 4:3133–3139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobos AP (2014) PVWatts version 5 manual. Golden, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Energy Matters LLC (2009) Solar and wind estimator assumptions and system sizing result comparisons. Solar-Estimate.org

  • Faiman (2008) Assessing the outdoor operating temperature of photovoltaic modules. Prog Photovolt 16:307–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia MCA, Balenzategui JL (2004) Estimation of photovoltaic module yearly temperature and performance based on nominal operation cell temperature calculations. Renew Energy 29(12)

  • Hall, Prairie, Anderson, Boes (1978) Generation of typical meterological years for 26 SOLMET stations. SAND78–1601. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidari N, Gwamuri J, Townsend T, Pearce JM (2015) Impact of snow and ground interference on photovoltaic electric system performance. IEEE J Photovoltaics 5:1680–1685. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2015.2466448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong T, Change W-K, Lin H-W (2013) A fresh look at weather impact on peak electricity demand and energy use of buildings using 30-year actual weather data. Appl Energy 111:333–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, Boyson, Kratochvil (2004) Photovoltaic array performance model. Albuquerque, Sandia National Laboratories

    Google Scholar 

  • Klise G, Stein J (2009) Models used to assess the performance of photovoltaic systems. SANDIA

  • Long H, Zhang Z, Su Y (2014) Analysis of daily solar power prediction with data-driven approaches. Appl Energy 126:29–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loutzenhiser, Manz, Felsmann, Strachan, Frank, Maxwell (2007) Empirical validation of models to compute solar irradiance on inclined surfaces for building energy simulation. Sol Energy 81:254–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marion B (2008) Comparison of predictive models for photovoltaic module performance. In: Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2008. PVSC ‘08. 33rd IEEE, 11–16 May 2008. pp 1–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2008.4922586

  • Marion, Urban (1995) Users manual for TMY2s typical meteorological years. National Renewable Energy Laboratory

  • Marion B, Schaefer R, Caine H, Sanchez G (2013) Measured and modeled photovoltaic system energy losses from snow for Colorado and Wisconsin locations. Sol Energy 97:112–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2013) PV watts—derate factors. http://www.nrel.gov/rredc/pvwatts/changing_parameters.html. Obtained 07/27/2013

  • National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2014) System Advisor Model (SAM) help system, Version 2014.1.14

  • Perez, Seals, Ineichen, Stewart, Menicucci (1987) A new simplified version of the Perez diffuse irradiance model for tilted surfaces. Sol Energy 39:221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez, Ineichen, Seals, Michalsky, Stewart (1990) Modeling daylight availability and irradiance components from direct and global irradiance. Sol Energy 44:271–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers L, Newmiller J, Townsend T (2010) Measuring and modeling the effect of snow on photovoltaic system performance. In: Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 2010 35th IEEE, 20–25 June 2010. pp 000973–000978. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2010.5614572

  • Raugei M, Fullana-i-Palmer P, Fthenakis V (2012) The energy return on energy investment (EROI) of photovoltaics: methodology and comparisons with fossil fuel lifecycles. Energ Policy 45:576–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo SA, Scelba G (2015) ANN based MPPT method for rapidly variable shading conditions. Appl Energy 145:124–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryberg D, Freeman J (2015) Integration, validation, and application of a PV snow coverage model in SAM. National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Su Y, Chan L-C, Shu L, Tsui K-L (2012) Real-time prediction models for output power and efficiency of grid-connected solar photovoltaic systems. Appl Energy 93:319–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TamizhMani G, Ji L, Tang Y, Petacci L, Osterwald C (2003) Photovoltaic module thermal/wind performance: long-term monitoring and model development for energy rating. Paper presented at the NCPV and Solar Program Review Meeting 2003

  • Thevenard D, Pelland S (2013) Estimating the uncertainty in long-term photovoltaic yield predictions. Sol Energy 91:432–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2011.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Energy Information Administration (2015) Annual energy outlook 2015 with projections to 2040 vol DOE/EIA-0383(2015)

  • Wilcox S, Marion W (2008) Users manual for TMY3 data sets, Technical Report NREL/TP-581-43,156. National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was performed, in part, at the Center for Nanoscale Materials, a U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences User Facility, under contract no. DE-AC02-06CH11357.

Funding

This research has been supported, in part, by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under Grant No. NNX14AG57A issued through the Education Opportunities in NASA STEM (EONS) program for NICE-T, the National Science Foundation under Grant No. HRD-1417582 issued through the NSF Catalyzing Opportunities for Research and Education TCUP program, and the Environmental Protection Agency under Grant No. 83696601.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa B. Bosman.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bosman, L.B., Darling, S.B. Performance modeling and valuation of snow-covered PV systems: examination of a simplified approach to decrease forecasting error. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 15484–15491 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1748-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1748-1

Keywords

Navigation