Change history
06 January 2020
The article was updated to correct the following errors due to an error in production:
References
Werner RA, Bundschuh RA, Bundschuh L et al (2019) Semiquantitative parameters in PSMA-targeted PET imaging with [18F]DCFPyL: impact of tumor burden on normal organ uptake. Mol Imaging Biol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-019-01375-w
Yadav MP, Ballal SRK, Sahoo SN et al (2019) Radioligand therapy with 177Lu-PSMA for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Roentgenol 213:275–285
Gaertner FC, Halabi K, Ahmadzadehfar H et al (2017) Uptake of PSMA-ligands in normal tissues is dependent on tumor load in patients with prostate cancer. Oncotarget 8:55094–55103
Jansen BHE, Yaqub M, Voortman J et al (2019) Simplified methods for quantification of 18F-DCFPyL uptake in patients with prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.227520
Jansen BHE, Kramer GM, Cysouw MCF et al (2019) Healthy tissue uptake of 68Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA), 18F-DCFPyL, 18F-Fluoromethylcholine (FCH) and 18F-Dihydrotestosterone (FDHT). J Nucl Med. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.222505
Beauregard JM, Hofman MS, Kong G, Hicks RJ (2012) The tumour sink effect on the biodistribution of 68Ga-DOTA-octreotate: implications for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 39:50–56
Ilan E, Velikyan I, Sandstrom M et al (2019) Tumor-to-blood ratio for assessment of somatostatin receptor density in neuroendocrine tumors using 68Ga-DOTATOC and 68Ga-DOTATATE. J Nucl Med. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.228072
Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA (2009) From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med 50(Suppl 1):122S–150S
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge Dr. Michael Morris for his contributions in our collaborative study on [18F]DCFPyL response assessment.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The [18F]DCFPyL PET-CT scans shown were funded by the Prostate Cancer Foundation.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original version of this article was revised. Full information regarding the corrections made can be found in the erratum/correction for this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cysouw, M.C.F., Jansen, B.H.E., Yaqub, M. et al. Letter to the Editor re: Semiquantitative Parameters in PSMA-Targeted PET Imaging with [18F]DCFPyL: Impact of Tumor Burden on Normal Organ Uptake. Mol Imaging Biol 22, 15–17 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-019-01438-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-019-01438-y