Skip to main content
Log in

FDI Attractiveness in Greece

  • Published:
International Advances in Economic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the foreign direct investment (FDI) attractiveness for Greece as a host country compared with the rest of the EU countries. The main objective of this work is to identify the factors that improved or worsened Greece’s attractiveness during the last few years. An econometric model and a comparative index of FDI attractiveness have been constructed in order to identify the differences in the attractiveness of the countries. The results obtained prove that during the last few years Greece’s attractiveness as a host country for FDI has not only improved, but it also has a downward trend. The factors identified as crucial for the low FDI attractiveness in Greece are inefficient public governance, high taxation, inefficient infrastructure, and general macroeconomic conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The FDI, exchange rate, interest rate, exports, imports, industrial production, and labour cost variables have been taken from IMF, International Financial Statistics (various issues). The GNP, exports of primary commodities, fixed capital formation, population, and a number of university graduates variables have been taken from various publications of the National Statistics Service of Greece (Monthly Bulletin [various issues]). The source of the national patents variable is the OECD, Main Science and Technology Indicators (Monthly Bulletin [various issues]).

  2. See Phillips and Person (1988).

  3. A similar methodology is used in Pantelidis and Kyrkilis (1997).

  4. The data used are mainly from World Bank, World Development Indicators and IMD, World Competitiveness Yearkbook.

References

  • Ayalp, T., Sözeri, T., Baykaler, D., Alsan, A., & Özgünel, Y. (2004). FDI Attractiveness of Turkey. A Comparative Analysis, The Turkish Industrialists and Businessmen’s Association (TÜSIAD) and the Foreign Investors Association of Turkey (YASED).

  • Balasubramanyam, V. N., & Mahambare, V. (2003). Foreign direct investment in India, Lancaster University Management School, Working Paper 2003/001.

  • Balasubramanyam, V. N., Sapsford, D., & Griffiths, D. (2002). Regional integration agreements and foreign direct investment: Theory and preliminary evidence. The Manchester School, 70(3), 460–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, K., & Toubal, F. (2004). Foreign direct investment in central and eastern European countries: A dynamic panel analysis. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, J., & Scott-Green, S. C. (1999). The determinants of new foreign direct investment capital flows into the European community: A statistical comparison of the USA and Japan. Journal of Common Market Studies, 37(4), 597–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirbag, M., Mirza, H., & Weir, D. T. H. (1995). The dynamics of manufacturing joint ventures in Turkey and the role of industrial groups. Management International Review, 35, Special Issue, 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (1977). Trade location of economic activity and the multinational enterprise: A search for an eclectic approach. In B. Ohlin, P. O. Hesselborn, & P. M. Wijkman (eds) The international allocation of economic activity. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (1988). Explaining international production, London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (1993). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Wokingham: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galego, A, Vieira, C., & Vieira, I. (2004). The CEEC as FDI attractors. A menace to the EU periphery?. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 40(5), 74–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georganta, Z., Manos, K., Notis, B., Robolis, S., & Sakkas, D. (1986). Foreign Investment in Greece. Athens: Centre for Planning and Economic Research, (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Janicki, H. P., & Wunnava, P. V. (2004). Determinants of foreign direct investment: Empirical evidence from EU accession candidates. Applied Economics, 36, 505–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewendahl, H., & Ertugal-Loewendahl, E. (2001). Turkey’s performance in attracting foreign direct investment: Implications of EU enlargement. European network of economic policy research institutes, Working Paper No. 8.

  • Neven, D. J., & Siotis, G. (1996) Technology sourcing and FDI in the EC: An empirical evaluation. International Journal of Industrial economics, 14(5), 543–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxelheim, L., & Ghauri, P. (2004). The European union and the race for foreign direct investment in Europe. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pain, N., & Lansbury, M. (1997). Regional economic integration and foreign direct investment in Europe. National Institute Economic Review, 160, 87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pantelides, P., & Kyrkilis, D. (1997). Location advantages and inward foreign direct investment in Greece. In K. Macharzina, M. Oesterle, & J. Wolf (eds) Global business in the information age, vol. 1. Stuttgart: European International Business Academy (EIBA), pp 313–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. C. B., & Person, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root. Biometrica, 75, 335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2003) World Investment Report (various issues).

  • Yoshitomi, M., & Graham, E. (1996). Foreign direct investment in Japan. Cheltenham: Edward Edgar Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pantelis Pantelidis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pantelidis, P., Nikolopoulos, E. FDI Attractiveness in Greece. Int Adv Econ Res 14, 90–100 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-007-9106-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-007-9106-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation