Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Sialography: a pictorial review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Oral Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Non-tumour inflammatory and obstructive salivary gland pathologies such as sialadenitis, sialolithiasis, sialadenosis, ductal strictures, etc. require precise radiological evaluation and mapping of salivary gland ductal system for better treatment outcome. Conventional sialography is considered as a useful and reliable technique in evaluation of salivary glands especially intrinsic and acquired abnormalities involving the ductal system and is useful for detection of non-radiopaque sialoliths which are invisible on routine plain radiographs. Primarily sialography is used as a diagnostic tool, additionally it plays an important therapeutic role as salivary gland lavage in cases of recurrent salivary gland infections and in obstructive salivary gland disorders by helping in clearance of mucous plugs or small sialoliths within the ducts. Recently, diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT) sialography is being explored and has been reported to have high sensitivity in detection of small sialoliths and allows differentiation of sialoliths from other calcifications in glandular ductal system. Multiplanar three dimensional (3D) reconstructed CT images have been reported to play a key role in determination of anatomical location or extent of salivary gland disease without superimposition or distortion of structures. This review aims to discuss the disease specific applications of sialography and CT Sialography in particular for visualization of salivary gland disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Raw data was generated at a the Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. Derived data that support the findings of this study is avaliable from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Rastogi R, Bhargava S, Mallarajapatna GJ, Singh SK. Pictorial essay: salivary gland imaging. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2012;22:325–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bertin H, Bonnet R, Delemazure AS, Mourrain-Langlois E, Mercier J, Corre P. Three-dimensional cone-beam CT sialography in non tumour salivary pathologies: procedure and results. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017;46(1):20150431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Reddy SS, Rakesh N, Raghav N, Devaraju D, Bijjal SG. Sialography: report of 3 cases. Indian J Dent Res. 2009;20:499–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jungehülsing M, Fischbach R, Schröder U, Kugel H, Damm M, Eckel HE. Magnetic resonance sialography. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;121:488–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kalinowski M, Heverhagen JT, Rehberg E, Klose KJ, Wagner HJ. Comparative study of MR sialography and digital subtraction sialography for benign salivary gland disorders. Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23:1485–92.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Varghese JC, Thorton F, Lucey BC, et al. A prospective comparative study of MR sialography and conventional sialography of salivary duct disease. AJR Am J Roentgeol. 1999;173:1497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McGahan JP, Walter JP, Bernstein L. Evaluation of the parotid gland. Comparison of sialography, non-contrast computed tomography, and CT sialography. Radiology. 1984;152:453–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tshipskiy AV, Kondrashin SA. Contrast radiography of the salivary glands. Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2015;94:45–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rzymska-Grala I, Stopa Z, Grala B, Gołębiowski M, Wanyura H, Zuchowska A, et al. Salivary gland calculi-contemporary methods of imaging. Pol J Radiol. 2010;75:25–37.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hollender L, Lindvall AM. Sialographic technique. Presentation of method and survey of literature. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1977;6:31–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Szolar DH, Groell R, Preidler K, et al. Three-dimensional processing of ultrafast CT sialography for parotid masses. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1995;16:1889–93.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Epstein NE. When to stop anticoagulation, anti-platelet aggregates, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs) prior to spine surgery. Surg Neurol Int. 2019;10:45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Frommer J. The human accessory parotid gland: its incidence, nature, and significance. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1977;43:671–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Köybaşioğlu A, Ileri F, Gençay S, Poyraz A, Uslu S, Inal E. Submandibular accessory salivary gland causing Warthin’s duct obstruction. Head Neck. 2000;22:717–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jardim EC, Ponzoni D, de Carvalho PS, Demétrio MR, Aranega AM. Sialolithiasis of the submandibular gland. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22:1128–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Abdullah O, AlQudehy Z. Giant submandibular sialolith: a case report and literature review. Indian J Otol. 2016;22:126–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Purcell YM, Kavanagh RG, Cahalane AM, Carroll AG, Khoo SG, Killeen RP. The diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT of the neck for the investigation of sialolithiasis. Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38:2161–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Suleiman S, Hobsley M. Radiological appearance of parotid duct calculi. Br J Surg. 1980;67:879.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Koch M, Iro H. Salivary duct stenosis: diagnosis and treatment. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2017;37:132–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Becker M, Marchal F, Becker CD, Dulguerov P, Georgakopoulos G, Lehmann W, Terrier F. Sialolithiasis and salivary ductal stenosis: diagnostic accuracy of MR sialography with a three-dimensional extended-phase conjugate-symmetry rapid spin-echo sequence. Radiology. 2000;217:347–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Flores Robles BJ, Brea Álvarez B, Sanabria Sanchinel AA, et al. Sialodochitis fibrinosa (kussmaul disease) report of 3 cases and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e5132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Raad II, Sabbagh MF, Caranasos GJ. Acute bacterial sialadenitis: a study of 29 cases and review. Rev Infect Dis. 1990;12:591–601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Proctor GB, Shaalan AM. Disease-induced changes in salivary gland function and the composition of saliva. J Dent Res. 2021;100:1201–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Abdel Razek AAK, Mukherji S. Imaging of sialadenitis. Neuroradiol J. 2017;30:205–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Nisa SU. Chronic parotid sialadenitis with sialectasis: diagnosis of case through CT sialography. J Pharm Biomed Sci. 2016;4:234–7.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Singh AG, Singh S, Matteson EL. Rate, risk factors and causes of mortality in patients with Sjögren’s syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016;55:450–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jonsson R, Brokstad KA, Jonsson MV, Delaleu N, Skarstein K. Current concepts on Sjögren’s syndrome—classification criteria and biomarkers. Eur J Oral Sci. 2018;126 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):37–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Thomas N, Kaur A, Reddy SS, Nagaraju R, Nagi R, Shankar VG. Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographic sialography in the diagnosis and management of primary Sjögren syndrome: report of 3 cases. Imaging Sci Dent. 2021;51:209–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Zaman S, Majid S, Chugtai O, Hussain M, Nasir M. Salivary gland tumours: a review of 91 cases. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2014;26:361–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Speight PM, Barrett AW. Salivary gland tumours: diagnostic challenges and an update on the latest WHO classification. Diagn Histopathol. 2020;24:147–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee YY, Wong KT, King AD, Ahuja AT. Imaging of salivary gland tumours. Eur J Radiol. 2008;66:419–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Thoeny HC. Imaging of salivary gland tumours. Cancer Imaging. 2007;30(7):52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kakimoto N, Gamoh S, Tamaki J, et al. CT and MR images of pleomorphic adenoma in major and minor salivary glands. Eur J Radiol. 2009;69:464–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Manipal Hospital, HAL Airport Road, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

    Srinivas Kandula

  2. Nu Face Dental Clinic and Implant Centre, Jalandhar, Punjab, India

    Ravleen Nagi

  3. Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, New BEL Road, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

    Rakesh Nagaraju

Authors
  1. Srinivas Kandula
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ravleen Nagi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rakesh Nagaraju
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rakesh Nagaraju.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kandula, S., Nagi, R. & Nagaraju, R. Sialography: a pictorial review. Oral Radiol 39, 225–234 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-022-00668-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-022-00668-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation