Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A technical report on the hamular technique for radiographing maxillary anterior teeth using a digital sensor

  • Technical Report
  • Published:
Oral Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Obtaining an intraoral periapical radiograph of the maxillary anterior teeth can be quite challenging, especially in patients where a rigid digital sensor cannot adequately fit in the palatal vault. This technical report presents a periapical radiographic technique that places the sensor in the space surrounding the hamular notch to avoid the spatial restrictions of the hard palate, opening the possibility of parallel alignment of the sensor and the long axis of the tooth, perpendicular alignment of the tube-head to both, and a minimally distorted resultant radiographic image.

Method

Four adult patients demonstrated the quantitative and qualitative features of this hamular technique (HT). A human skull demonstrated relative magnification and image quality.

Examples and results

While patient and equipment-specific, comparisons of magnification, distortion, and image quality illustrate the potential capabilities and limitations of the HT. The HT radiographs appeared to be less distorted than the variable-angle technique (VAT—a clinical approximation of the bisecting angle technique) but magnified 7.9–21.6%. A radiograph of an implant showed a 2.0% distortion over true aspect ratio. The HT radiograph from a human skull showed a slightly lighter and less sharp image than the VAT radiograph.

Conclusion

Preliminary results showed that while the HT images were magnified, lighter, and less sharp that the VAT, they were diagnosable for caries. In all the HT images presented in this technical report, there was less distortion than comparable techniques. Notably, one HT periapical radiograph of a maxillary lateral implant showed virtually no distortion, suggesting that a nearly parallel projection was achieved using the technique. While further research is needed, this report shows that the HT has the potential to produce minimally distorted digital radiographs of anterior teeth in patients where the sensor cannot adequately fit into the palatal vault.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aps J. Imaging in pediatric dental practice: a guide to equipment, techniques and clinical considerations. 1st ed. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 21.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Rozylo-Kalinowska I. Imaging techniques in dental radiology: acquisition, anatomic analysis and interpretation of radiographic images. 1st ed. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 18–24.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Dentsply Sirona. In: Intraoral sensor Schick 33. https://www.dentsplysirona.com/en-us/categories/imaging-systems/intraoral-imaging/schick-33.html. Accessed 27 June 2021.

  4. Williamson GF Intraoral Imaging: Basic Principles, Techniques and Error Correction. 2018. https://www.dentalcare.com/en-us/professional-education/ce-courses/ce559. Accessed 27 March 2021.

  5. Cohen S, Burns RC. Pathways of the pulp. 7th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1998. p. 92.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hubar JS. Fundamentals of oral and maxillofacial radiology. 1st ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2017. p. 41–60.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Pun MHJ. Thinking outside the box: radiographing maxillary lateral and cuspid teeth in patients with narrow palates. Ontario Dentist. 2021;98(6):40–5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2009. p. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Orhan K, Sakul BU, Oz U, Bilecenoglu B. Evaluation of the pterygoid hamulus morphology using cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112(2):e48-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liebgott B. The anatomical basis of dentistry. Toronto: B.C. Decker; 1986. p. 337.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Romoozi E, Razavi SH, Barouti P, Rahimi M. Investigating the morphologic indices of the hamulus pterygoid process using the CBCT technique. J Res Med Dent Sci. 2018;6(2):240–4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Barker B. The anatomy of the hamular notch region. Aust Dent J. 1981;26(4):218–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Casey D. The retroalveolar notch. Int J Prosthodont. 1988;1:29–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ramirez LM, Ballesteros LE, Sandoval GP. Hamular bursitis and its possible craniofacial referred symptomatology: two case reports. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2006;11:E1-5.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Southern implants. Tri-Nex product catalogue. 2004–2009;8.5:5.

  16. Frommer HH, Stabulas-Savage JJ. Radiology for the dental professional. 9th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2011. p. 174.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thank you to Dr. D. Collins, Dr. J. Mrozinski-Pierson, and Marion Oral Surgery Specialists for providing the skulls, and Dr. K. A. Galil for assisting in anatomical identification. Thank you to Dr. J. Mrozinski-Pierson and Talent Pho for proofreading the manuscript.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. H. Jim Pun.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards, except for an ethics committee.  The author is not associated with any educational institutions and was unable to get an ethics committee to review the study for ethics approval or waiver. Written informed consents for obtaining the images used for this publication were obtained from the patients. A copy of the consent form is available for review by the Editor of this journal. Informed consent was obtained from all patients in the study.

Informed consent

Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details and/or clinical images was obtained from each patient. A copy of the consent form is available for review by the Editor of this journal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pun, M.H.J. A technical report on the hamular technique for radiographing maxillary anterior teeth using a digital sensor. Oral Radiol 38, 297–307 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-021-00559-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-021-00559-x

Keywords

Navigation